Skip to main content
Log in

Cr(VI) removal performance from aqueous solution by Pseudomonas sp. strain DC-B3 isolated from mine soil: characterization of both Cr(VI) bioreduction and total Cr biosorption processes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial methods are promising and environmentally friendly methods for remediating heavy metal contamination. In this study, a Cr(VI)-resistant bacterial strain, DC-B3, which was identified as Pseudomonas sp. by 16S rDNA gene sequencing, was isolated from heavy metal-contaminated mine soil, and its performance in Cr(VI) removal from wastewater in terms of Cr(VI) reduction and total Cr adsorption was assessed. This strain exhibited a high capability to reduce Cr(VI) to less toxic Cr(III) without the addition of an external electron donor at low pH (2.0). The Cr(VI) reduction capacity and rate both increased linearly with increasing Cr(VI) concentration, with a reduction capacity of 32.0 mg Cr(VI)·g−1 achieved at an initial concentration of 135.0 mg L−1 over 75 h. In addition, 41.0% of the total Cr was removed from the solution by biosorption, and equilibrium was reached within approximately 5 h. The total Cr sorption process was well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic and Langmuir isotherm models. Desorption assays indicated that NaOH was the most efficient agent for total Cr desorption, and Cr(VI) and generated Cr(III) were both loaded on the DC-B3 biomass. The bacterial cells after Cr treatment were characterized by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses. Strain DC-B3 showed high potential for possible application in the remediation of Cr(VI) contamination in mine areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahemad M (2014) Bacterial mechanisms for Cr (VI) resistance and reduction: an overview and recent advances. Folia Microbiol 59(4):321–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali RM, Hamad HA, Hussein MM, Malash GF (2016) Potential of using green adsorbent of heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions: adsorption kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic, mechanism and economic analysis. Ecol Eng 91:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anupam K, Sikder J, Pal S, Halder G (2015) Optimizing the cross-flow nanofiltration process for chromium (VI) removal from simulated wastewater through response surface methodology. Environ Prog Sustain 34(5):1332–1340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anupam K, Dutta S, Bhattacharjee C, Datta S (2016) Artificial neural network modelling for removal of chromium (VI) from wastewater using physisorption onto powdered activated carbon. Desalin Water Treat 57(8):3632–3641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bharagava RN, Mishra S (2018) Hexavalent chromium reduction potential of Cellulosimicrobium sp. isolated from common effluent treatment plant of tannery industries. Ecotox Environ Safe 147:102–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A, Gupta A (2013) Evaluation of Acinetobacter sp. B9 for Cr (VI) resistance and detoxification with potential application in bioremediation of heavy-metals-rich industrial wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut R 20(9):6628–6637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo FAO, Bento FM, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2003) Chromate reduction by chromium-resistant bacteria isolated from soils contaminated with dichromate. J Environ Qual 32(4):1228–1233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Duan Y, Dong J, Shen S, Si G, He F, Yang Q, Chen J (2019) Bioremediation of Hg-contaminated soil by combining a novel Hg-volatilizing Lecythophora sp. fungus, DC-F1, with biochar: performance and the response of soil fungal community. Sci Total Environ 671:676–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Dong J, Shen S, Mei J, Chang J (2019) Isolation of the Hg (II)-volatilizing Bacillus sp. strain DC-B2 and its potential to remediate Hg (II)-contaminated soils. J Chem Technol Biot 94(5):1433–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung KH, Gu JD (2007) Mechanism of hexavalent chromium detoxification by microorganisms and bioremediation application potential: a review. Int Biodeter Biodegr 59(1):8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa M (2003) Potential hazards of hexavalent chromate in our drinking water. Toxicol Appl Pharm 188(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Mishra J, Das SK, Pandey S, Rao DS, Chakraborty A, Thatoi H (2014) Investigation on mechanism of Cr (VI) reduction and removal by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, a novel chromate tolerant bacterium isolated from chromite mine soil. Chemosphere 96:112–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhal B, Thatoi H, Das N, Pandey BD (2010) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by Bacillus sp. isolated from chromite mine soils and characterization of reduced product. J Chem Technol Biot 85(11):1471–1479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhal B, Thatoi HN, Das NN, Pandey BD (2013) Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: a review. J Hazard Mater 250-251:272–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Ma LQ, Li Y (2011) Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. J Hazard Mater 190(1-3):909–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq U, Kozinski JA, Khan MA, Athar M (2010) Biosorption of heavy metal ions using wheat based biosorbents–a review of the recent literature. Bioresource Technol 101(14):5043–5053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y, Xu W, Liu Y, Zeng G, Huang J, Tan X, Jian H, Hu X, Li F, Wang D (2015) Mechanism of Cr (VI) reduction by Aspergillus niger: enzymatic characteristic, oxidative stress response, and reduction product. Environ Sci Pollut R 22(8):6271–6279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Wong YS, Wong MH, Tam NFY (2007) Biosorption and bioreduction of Cr (VI) by a microalgal isolate, Chlorella miniata. J Hazard Mater 146(1-2):65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hlihor RM, Figueiredo H, Tavares T, Gavrilescu M (2017) Biosorption potential of dead and living Arthrobacter viscosus biomass in the removal of Cr (VI): batch and column studies. Process Saf Environ 108:44–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Gu H, Cui C, Ji R (2016) Toxicity of combined chromium (VI) and phenanthrene pollution on the seed germination, stem lengths, and fresh weights of higher plants. Environ Sci Pollut R 23(15):15227–15235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobby R, Jha P, Yadav AK, Desai N (2018) Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)]: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere 207:255–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karthik C, Ramkumar VS, Pugazhendhi A, Gopalakrishnan K, Arulselvi PI (2017) Biosorption and biotransformation of Cr (VI) by novel Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AR6. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 70:282–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Chen JQ, Mei J, Chang JJ, Wang QY, Wan GS, Yin BY (2018) Characterization of Cu and Cd biosorption by Pseudomonas sp. strain DC-B3 isolated from metal mine soil. Int J Environ Sci Te. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2011-5

  • Long B, Ye B, Liu Q, Zhang S, Ye J, Zou L, Shi J (2018) Characterization of Penicillium oxalicum SL2 isolated from indoor air and its application to the removal of hexavalent chromium. Plos One 13(1):e0191484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejias Carpio IE, Ansari A, Rodrigues DF (2017) Relationship of biodiversity with heavy metal tolerance and sorption capacity: a meta-analysis approach. Environ Sci Technol 52(1):184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miretzky P, Cirelli AF (2010) Cr (VI) and Cr (III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: a review. J Hazard Mater 180:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Liu Z, Chen Z, Cheng Y, Pan D, Shao J, Lin Z, Guan X (2014) Investigation of Cr (VI) reduction and Cr (III) immobilization mechanism by planktonic cells and biofilms of Bacillus subtilis ATCC-6633. Water Res 55:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Yun YS, Jo JH, Park JM (2005) Mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal by dead fungal biomass of Aspergillus niger. Water Res 39(4):533–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SEPA (2002) Water and wastewater analyzing methods. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva B, Figueiredo H, Quintelas C, Neves IC, Tavares T (2012) Improved biosorption for Cr (VI) reduction and removal by Arthrobacter viscosus using zeolite. Int Biodeter Biodegr 74:116–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinath T, Verma T, Ramteke PW, Garg SK (2002) Chromium (VI) biosorption and bioaccumulation by chromate resistant bacteria. Chemosphere 48(4):427–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan K, Yun YS (2008) Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. Biotechnol Adv 26(3):266–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27(2):195–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Cui Y (2019) Recognition of a new Cr (VI)-reducing strain and study of the potential capacity for reduction of Cr (VI) of the strain. Biomed Res Int 2019.

  • Wei W, Li A, Ma F, Pi S, Yang J, Wang Q, Ni BJ (2018) Simultaneous sorption and reduction of Cr (VI) in aquatic system by microbial extracellular polymeric substances from Klebsiella, sp. J1. J Chem Technol Biot 93(11):3152–3159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Luo M, Li W, Wei X, Xie K, Liu L, Jiang C, Liu H (2011) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by Pannonibacter phragmitetus LSSE-09 stimulated with external electron donors under alkaline conditions. J Hazard Mater 185(2-3):1169–1176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yen HW, Chen PW, Hsu CY, Lee L (2017) The use of autotrophic Chlorella vulgaris in chromium (VI) reduction under different reduction conditions. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 74:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51668067), the Major Research and Development Project of Yunnan Province, China (2018BC001), the Project of Science and Technology Program of Yunnan Province, China (2017FB090), the Open Fund of Yunnan Key Laboratory for Plateau Mountain Ecology and Restoration of Degraded Environments (2018DG005), and Yunnan University, China (C176210103, 2018YDJQ018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinquan Chen.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, J., Deng, S., Liang, Y. et al. Cr(VI) removal performance from aqueous solution by Pseudomonas sp. strain DC-B3 isolated from mine soil: characterization of both Cr(VI) bioreduction and total Cr biosorption processes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 28135–28145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06017-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06017-w

Keywords

Navigation