Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative efficiency of peanut shell and peanut shell biochar for removal of arsenic from water

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contamination of surface water and groundwater streams with carcinogenic chemicals such as arsenic (As) has been a major environmental issue worldwide, and requires significant attention to develop new and low-cost sorbents to treat As-polluted water. In the current study, arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) removal efficiency of peanut shell biochar (PSB) was compared with peanut shell (PS) in aqueous solutions. Sorption experiments showed that PSB possessed relatively higher As removal efficiency than PS, with 95% As(III) (at pH 7.2) and 99% As(V) (at pH 6.2) with 0.6 g L−1 sorbent dose, 5 mg L−1 initial As concentration, and 2 h equilibrium time. Experimental data followed a pseudo-second-order model for sorption kinetics showing the dominance of chemical interactions (surface complexation) between As and surface functional groups. The Langmuir model for sorption isotherm indicated that As was sorbed via a monolayer sorption process. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analyses revealed that the hydroxyl (–OH) and aromatic surface functional (C=O, C=C–C, and –C–H) groups contributed significantly in the sorption of both As species from aqueous solutions through surface complexation and/or electrostatic reactions. We demonstrate that the pyrolysis of abandoned PS yields a novel, low-cost, and efficient biochar which provides dual benefits of As-rich water treatment and a value-added sustainable strategy for solid waste disposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abid M, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Farooqi A, Ok YS, Kunhikrishnan A, Ali F, Ali S, Igalavithana AD, Arshad M (2016) Arsenic (V) biosorption by charred orange peel in aqueous environments. Int J Phytoremediation 18:442–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Lee SS, Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M, Cho JS, Lee S-E, Ok YS (2013) Trichloroethylene adsorption by pine needle biochars produced at various pyrolysis temperatures. Biomagn Res Technol 143:615–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Rizwan M, Qayyum MF, Ok YS, Ibrahim M, Riaz M, Arif MS, Hafeez F, Al-Wabel MI, Shahzad AN (2017) Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:12700–12712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atar N, Olgun A (2007) Removal of acid blue 062 on aqueous solution using calcinated colemanite ore waste. J Hazard Mater 146:171–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atar N, Olgun A (2009) Removal of basic and acid dyes from aqueous solutions by a waste containing boron impurity. Desalination 249:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Saha D, Saha R, Ghosh T, Saha B (2014) A review on sources, toxicity and remediation technologies for removing arsenic from drinking water. Res Chem Intermed 40:447–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boddu VM, Abburi K, Talbott JL, Smith ED, Haasch R (2008) Removal of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) from aqueous medium using chitosan-coated biosorbent. Water Res 42:633–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen Z, Lv S (2011) A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic pollutants and phosphate. Bioresour Technol 102:716–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Huang Q, Khan S, Liu Y, Liao Z, Li G, Ok YS (2016) Adsorption of Cd by peanut husks and peanut husk biochar from aqueous solutions. Ecol Eng 87:240–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheraghi M, Lorestani B, Merrikhpour H, Mosaed HP (2013) Assessment efficiency of tea wastes in arsenic removal from aqueous solution. Desal Water Treat:1–6

  • Çolak F, Atar N, Olgun A (2009) Biosorption of acidic dyes from aqueous solution by Paenibacillus macerans: kinetic, thermodynamic and equilibrium studies. Chem Eng J 150:122–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cope CO, Webster DS, Sabatini DA (2014) Arsenate adsorption onto iron oxide amended rice husk char. Sci Total Environ 488:554–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dieme M, Villot A, Gerente C, Andres Y, Diop S, Diawara C (2017) Sustainable conversion of agriculture wastes into activated carbons: energy balance and arsenic removal from water. Environ Technol 38:353–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Xu X, Phan T, Hu X, Nie G (2018) High adsorption performance for As (III) and As (V) onto novel aluminum-enriched biochar derived from abandoned Tetra Paks. Chemosphere 208:800–807

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Ma LQ, Li Y (2011) Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. J Hazard Mater 190:909–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Banna MF, Mosa A, Gao B, Yin X, Ahmad Z, Wang H (2018) Sorption of lead ions onto oxidized bagasse-biochar mitigates Pb-induced oxidative stress on hydroponically grown chicory: experimental observations and mechanisms. Chemosphere 208:887–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Q, Chen B, Lin Y, Guan Y (2013) Aromatic and hydrophobic surfaces of wood-derived biochar enhance perchlorate adsorption via hydrogen bonding to oxygen-containing organic groups. Environ Sci Technol 48:279–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foo K, Hameed B (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Rosales G, Longoria-Gándara L, Cruz-Cruz G, Olayo-González M, Mejía-Cuero R, Pérez PÁ (2018) Fe-TiOx nanoparticles on pineapple peel: synthesis, characterization and As (V) sorption. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 9:112–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani-Khosrowshahi S, Behnajady M (2016) Chromium (VI) adsorption from aqueous solution by prepared biochar from Onopordom Heteracanthom. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:1803–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Zhang D, Ni P, Cao Y, Li F (2017) Hydrogeological and geochemical comparison of high arsenic groundwaters in inland basins, PR China. Proced Earth Plan Sc 17:416–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Ding Z, Zimmerman AR, Wang S, Gao B (2015) Batch and column sorption of arsenic onto iron-impregnated biochar synthesized through hydrolysis. Water Res 68:206–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IARC (2004) Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 84:1–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman AR, Pullammanappallil P, Cao X (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested biomass. Bioresour Technol 110:50–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inyang MI, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Mosa A, Pullammanappallil P, Ok YS, Cao X (2016) A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:406–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jellali S, Diamantopoulos E, Haddad K, Anane M, Durner W, Mlayah A (2016) Lead removal from aqueous solutions by raw sawdust and magnesium pretreated biochar: experimental investigations and numerical modelling. J Environ Manag 180:439–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Cedilloa MJ, Olguin MT, Fall C, Colin-Cruz A (2013) As(III) and As(V) sorption on iron-modified non-pyrolyzed and pyrolyzed biomass from Petroselinum crispum (parsley). J Environ Manag 117:242–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keiluweit M, Nice PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil U, Shakoor MB, Ali S, Rizwan M (2018) Tea waste as a potential biowaste for removal of hexavalent chromium from wastewater: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Arab J Geosci 11:573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Balomajumder C, Mondal P (2011) Application of agro-based biomasses for zinc removal from wastewater—a review. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water 39:641–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lalhmunsiama DT, Lee S-M (2012) Activated carbon and manganese coated activated carbon precursor to dead biomass in the remediation of arsenic contaminated water. Environ Eng Res 17:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoble V, Deluchat V, Serpaud B, Bollinger J-C (2003) Arsenite oxidation and arsenate determination by the molybdene blue method. Talanta 61:267–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xu W-h, Y-g L, X-f T, G-m Z, Li X, Liang J, Zhou Z, Z-l Y, X-x C (2017) Facile synthesis of Cu (II) impregnated biochar with enhanced adsorption activity for the removal of doxycycline hydrochloride from water. Sci Total Environ 592:546–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López GP, Castner DG, Ratner BD (1991) XPS O 1s binding energies for polymers containing hydroxyl, ether, ketone and ester groups. Surf Interface Anal 17:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luqman M, Javed MM, Yasar A, Ahmad J, Khan A (2013) An overview of sustainable techniques used for arsenic removal from drinking water in rural areas of the Indo-Pak subcontinent. Soil and Environ 32:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr, Bricka M, Smith F, Yancey B, Mohammad J, Steele PH, Alexandre-Franco MF, Gomez-Serrano V, Gong H (2007) Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J Colloid Interface Sci 310:57–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Rajput S, Singh VK, Steele PH, Pittman CU Jr (2011) Modeling and evaluation of chromium remediation from water using low cost bio-char, a green adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 188:319–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU Jr (2014) Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent—a critical review. Bio. Res. Technol. 160:191–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Burton ED, Wang H, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Luttge A (2018a) Arsenic removal by perilla leaf biochar in aqueous solutions and groundwater: an integrated spectroscopic and microscopic examination. Environ Pollut 232:31–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Ok YS, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Wang H, Murtaza B, Islam E, Nawaz MF (2018b) Arsenic removal by Japanese oak wood biochar in aqueous solutions and well water: investigating arsenic fate using integrated spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Sci Total Environ 621:1642–1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olgun A, Atar N (2012) Equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies for the adsorption of lead (II) and nickel (II) onto clay mixture containing boron impurity. J Ind Eng Chem 18:1751–1757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash O, Singh SK, Singh B, Singh RK (2013) Investigation of coordination properties of isolated adenine to copper metal: a systematic spectroscopic and DFT study. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 112:410–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad KS, Ramanathan A, Paul J, Subramanian V, Prasad R (2014) Biosorption of arsenite (As+3) and arsenate (As+5) from aqueous solution by Arthrobacter sp. biomass. Environ Technol 34:2701–2708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qayyum MF, Abid M, Danish S, Saeed MK, Ali MA (2015) Effects of various biochars on seed germination and carbon mineralization in an alkaline soil. Pakistan J Agric Sci 51:977–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed H, Slack R, Kay P (2016) Human health risk assessment for arsenic: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:1529–1583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raza M, Hussain F, Lee J-Y, Shakoor MB, Kwon KD (2017) Groundwater status in Pakistan: a review of contamination, health risks, and potential needs. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol:1–50

  • Rizwan M, Ali S, Qayyum MF, Ibrahim M, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Abbas T, Ok YS (2016) Mechanisms of biochar-mediated alleviation of toxicity of trace elements in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2230–2248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R-k X, S-c X, Yuan J-h, A-z Z (2011) Adsorption of methyl violet from aqueous solutions by the biochars derived from crop residues. Bioresour Technol 102:10293–10298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samsuri AW, Sadegh-Zadeh F, Seh-Bardan BJ (2013) Adsorption of As (III) and As (V) by Fe coated biochars and biochars produced from empty fruit bunch and rice husk. J Environ Chem Eng 1:981–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor MB, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Murtaza G, Kunhikrishnan A, Seshadri B, Shahid M, Ali S, Bolan NS, Ok YS, Abid M, Ali F (2016) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated water using agricultural wastes as biosorbents. Critic Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:467–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor MB, Nawaz R, Hussain F, Raza M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Oh S-E, Ahmad S (2017) Human health implications, risk assessment and remediation of As-contaminated water: a critical review. Sci Tot Environ 601:756–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor MB, Bibi I, Niazi NK, Shahid M, Nawaz MF, Farooqi A, Naidu R, Rahman MM, Murtaza G, Luttge A (2018a) The evaluation of arsenic contamination potential, speciation and hydrogeochemical behaviour in aquifers of Punjab, Pakistan. Chemosphere 199:737–746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor MB, Niazi NK, Bibi I, Shahid M, Sharif F, Bashir S, Shaheen SM, Wang H, Tsang DC, Ok YS (2018b) Arsenic removal by natural and chemically modified water melon rind in aqueous solutions and groundwater. Sci Total Environ 645:1444–1455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taheri M, Gharaie MHM, Mehrzad J, Afshari R, Datta S (2017) Hydrogeochemical and isotopic evaluation of arsenic contaminated waters in an argillic alteration zone. J Geochem Explor 175:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tajernia H, Ebadi T, Nasernejad B, Ghafori M (2014) Arsenic removal from water by sugarcane bagasse: an application of response surface methodology (RSM). Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2017) https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf/.

  • Vithanage M, Herath I, Joseph S, Bundschuh J, Bolan N, Ok YS, Kirkham M, Rinklebe J (2017) Interaction of arsenic with biochar in soil and water: a critical review. Carbon 113:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Liu G, Zheng H, Li F, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liu C, Chen L, Xing B (2015) Investigating the mechanisms of biochars removal of lead from solution. Bioresour Technol 177:308–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2008): Guidelines for drinking-water quality. T, pp. 306

  • Wu C, Huang L, Xue S-G, Huang Y-Y, Hartley W, M-q C, Wong M-H (2017) Arsenic sorption by red mud-modified biochar produced from rice straw. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:18168–18178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon K, Cho D-W, Tsang DC, Bolan N, Rinklebe J, Song H (2017) Fabrication of engineered biochar from paper mill sludge and its application into removal of arsenic and cadmium in acidic water. Bioresour Technol 246:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Liu C, Zheng T, Ma J, Zhang G, Ren G, Wang L, Liu Y (2018) Efficient oxidation and sorption of arsenite using a novel titanium (IV)-manganese (IV) binary oxide sorbent. J Hazard Mater 353:410–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Xi S (2018) A review on arsenic carcinogenesis: epidemiology, metabolism, genotoxicity and epigenetic changes. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 99:78–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Y-g L, S-b L, H-y L, G-m Z, X-f T, C-p Y, Ding Y, Z-l Y, X-x C (2017) Sorption performance and mechanisms of arsenic (V) removal by magnetic gelatin-modified biochar. Chem Eng J 314:223–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Center of Nanotechnology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for providing the analytical facility.

Funding

The study received financial support from the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan (Project No. 1430/SRGP/R&D/HEC/2016) and Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. Dr Nabeel Khan Niazi is thankful to the University of Agriculture Faisalabad and University of Southern Queensland, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Bilal Shakoor.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Tito Roberto Cadaval Jr

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 464 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sattar, M.S., Shakoor, M.B., Ali, S. et al. Comparative efficiency of peanut shell and peanut shell biochar for removal of arsenic from water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 18624–18635 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05185-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05185-z

Keywords

Navigation