Skip to main content
Log in

Use of biogas solid residue from anaerobic digestion as an effective amendment to remediate Cr(VI)-contaminated soils

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromium (Cr) is one of the most common metal pollutants and has thus attracted considerable attention. In this study, we investigated the potential use of biogas solid residue (BSR) from anaerobic digestion as an effective amendment to decrease the bioavailability of Cr in Cr(VI)-polluted soil using pot experiments. Compared to the no-addition treatment, the addition of BSR (treatments—50, 100, and 150 g kg−1 soil) increased the soil nutrient levels, microbial diversity and activities, and decreased the redox potential (Eh). BSR treatment of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil caused a reduction in soil Cr(VI) concentration (16.6–52.1%) and the exchangeable Cr proportion (15.2–52.4%), thereby decreasing the available Cr for uptake by plants. BSR treatments resulted in a reduction in the Cr contents of the roots and aboveground biomass of pakchoi plants. The Cr(VI) content in treated soils decreased with increasing BSR addition, with 150 g kg−1 being the most efficient application. The relative abundance of Cr-reducing groups, such as Pseudomonas, Microbacterium, and Bacillus, increased with the increase in BSR application. The enhancement of soil Cr(VI) immobilization by the addition of the BSR was mostly attributed to the simultaneous effect of organic matter addition, stimulation of microorganisms, and reduced Eh value. Organic matter contributed more to the variation in Cr. The presence of BSR decreased the bioavailability of Cr in the soil and, therefore, lowered the potential mobilization of Cr(VI) from the soils. Our results demonstrated that BSR application may offer a potentially promising solution for enhancing agricultural production in Cr-contaminated soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alburquerque JA, Fuente C, Ferrer-Costa A, Carrasco L, Cegarra J, Abad M, Bernal MP (2012) Assessment of the fertilizer potential of BSR from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 40:181–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniadis V, Alloway BJ (2002) The role of dissolved organic carbon in the mobility of Cd, Ni and Zn in sewage sludge-amended soils. Environ Pollut 117:515–521

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascar L, Ahumada I, Richter P (2008) Influence of redox potential (Eh) on the availability of arsenic species in soils and soils amended with biosolid. Chemosphere 72:1548–1552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur A, Afzal A, Ahmad R, Nasir F, Khan A, Suthar V, Jan G, Batool A, Zia MA, Mahmood-ul-Hassan M (2016) Influence of metal-resistant Rhizobacteria on the growth of Helianthus annuus L. in Cr(VI)-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:467

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Diaz CE, Lugo-Lugo V, Bilyeu B (2012) A review of chemical, electrochemical and biological methods for aqueous Cr(VI) reduction. J Hazard Mater 223:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Natesan R, Koo BJ (2003) Effects of organic amendments on the reduction and phytoavailability of chromate in mineral soil. J Environ Qual 32:120–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4516–4522

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Blagodatskaya E, Senbayram M, Blagodatsky S, Myachina O, Dittert K, Kuzyakov K (2012) Decomposition of biogas residues in soil and their effects on microbial growth kinetics and enzyme activities. Biomass Bioenergy 45:221–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Dou J, Xu H (2018) Remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil with co-composting of three different biomass solid wastes. J Soils Sediments 18:897–905

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clescerl LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Health Lab Sci 4:137

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhal B, Thatoi HN, Das NN, Pandey BD (2013) Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: a review. J Hazard Mater 250–251:272–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan CJ, Fang LC, Yang CL, Chen WB, Cui YX, Li SQ (2018) Reveal the response of enzyme activities to heavy metals through in situ zymography. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156:106–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang LC, Wang MK, Cai L, Cang L (2017) Deciphering biodegradable chelant-enhanced phytoremediation through microbes and nitrogen transformation in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:14627–14636

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fei Y, Liu C, Li F, Chen M, Tong H, Liu C, Liao C (2017) Combined modification of clay with sulfhydryl and iron: toxicity alleviation in Cr-contaminated soils for mustard (Brassica juncea) growth. J Geochem Explor 176:2–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Delgado Juárez M, Waldhuber S, Knapp A, Partl C, Gomez-Brandon M, Insam H (2013) Wood ash effects on chemical and microbiological properties of digestate- and manure-amended soils. Biol Fertil Soils 49:575–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohne T, Diaz-Bone RA, Du Laing G, Rinklebe J (2015) Impact of systematic change of redox potential on the leaching of Ba, Cr, Sr, and V from a riverine soil into water. J Soils Sediments 15:623–633

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd GM (2010) Metals and microorganisms: a problem of definition. FEMS Microbiol Lett 100:197–203

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Gonzalo P, Del Real AE, Lobo MC, Pérez-Sanz A (2017a) Different genotypes of Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke grown on chromium-contaminated soils influence root organic acid composition and rhizosphere bacterial communities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Gonzalo P, Del Real AE, Pirredda M, Gismera MJ, Lobo MC, Pérez-Sanz A (2017b) Phytoavailability of Cr in Silene vulgaris: the role of soil, plant genotype and bacterial rhizobiome. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 144:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan T, Feng W, Wang HC, Wang YH, Zhu YJ, Guo TC (2010) Effect of biogas slurry top-dressing on soil microorganisms and enzyme activity in the rhizosphere of winter wheat field. Journal of Triticeae Crops 30:721–726 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Guggenberger G, Glaser B, Zech W (1994) Heavy metal binding by hydrophobic and hydrophilic dissolved organic carbon fractions in a spodosol a and B horizon. Water Air Soil Pollut 72:111–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo XF, Li HS, Chen HY (2017) The effects of biochar and intercropping on the Cd, Cr and Zn speciation in soils and plant uptake by Machilus pauhoi. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 98:574–581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He J, He C, Chen X, Liang X, Huang T, Yang X, Shang H (2018) Comparative study of remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil using electrokinetics combined with bioremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Insam H, Gomez-Brandon M, Ascher J (2015) Manure-based biogas fermentation residues e friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol Biochem 84:1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaludeen S, Megharaj M, Juhasz A, Sethunathan N, Naidu R (2003) Chromium microorganism interactions in soils: remediation implications. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 178:93–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpiene J, Lagerkvis A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of as, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—a review. Waste Manag 28:215–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunhikrishnan A, Choppala G, Seshadri B, Wijesekara H, Bolan NS, Mbene K, Kim W (2017) Impact of wastewater derived dissolved organic carbon on reduction, mobility, and bioavailability of as(V) and Cr(VI) in contaminated soils. J Environ Manag 186:183–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Huang JH, Lin LY, Wang SL (2016) Enhanced immobilization of Cr(VI) in soils by the amendment of rice-straw char. Soil Sediment Contam Int J 25:505–518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo XS, Xue Y, Wang YL, Cang L, Xu B, Ding J (2015) Source identification and apportionment of heavy metals in urban soil profiles. Chemosphere 127:152–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdieh K, Shahin O, Nosratollah N, Alireza K (2016) Treatment of Cr(VI)-spiked soils using sulfur-based amendments. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:1474–1485

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLean J, Beveridge TJ (2001) Chromate reduction by a pseudomonad isolated from a site contaminated with chromated copper arsenate. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1076–1084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti SM, Bertoncini EI, Vitti AC, Alleoni LR, Abreu-Junior CH (2016) Concentration of Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Cd, and Pb in soil, sugarcane leaf and juice: residual effect of sewage sludge and organic compost application. Environ Monit Assess 188:1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munawaroh HSH, Gumilar GG, Kartikasari S, Kusumawaty D (2017) Microbial reduction of Cr (VI) in to Cr (III) by locally isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa. IOP Conf. Series: Materi. Sci. Eng 180:012279

  • National Development and Reform Commission of China (2017) National rural biogas development in 13th five-year plan (2015–2020)

  • Odlare M, Pell M, Svensson K (2008) Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Manag 28:1246–1253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorous. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis part 2, chemical and microbial properties. Agronomy Society of America, Agronomy Monograph 9, Madison, pp 403–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontañon OM, González PS, Ambrosio LF, Paisio CE, Agostini E (2014) Rhizoremediation of phenol and chromium by the synergistic combination of a native bacterial strain and Brassica napus hairy roots. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 8:192–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaglia B, Tambone F, Adani F (2013) Cr(VI) reduction capability of humic acid extracted from the organic component of municipal solid waste. J Environ Sci 25(3):487–494

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid M, Xiong T, Castrecrouelle M, Leveque T, Dumat C (2013) Water extraction kinetics of metals, arsenic and dissolved organic carbon from industrial contaminated poplar leaves. J Environ Sci 25:2451–2459

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid M, Shamshad S, Rafiq M, Khalid S, Bibi I, Niazi NK, Dumat C, Rashid MI (2017) Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil–plant system: a review. Chemosphere 178:513–533

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song Z, Zhang C (2015) Anaerobic codigestion of pretreated wheat straw with cattle manure and analysis of the microbial community. Bioresour Technol 186:128–135

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpe B, Werner S, Jung R, Heinze S, Jüschke E, Strippel C, Marschner B (2012) Organic carbon dynamics and enzyme activities in agricultural soils amended with biogas slurry, liquid manure and sewage sludge. Agric Sci 3:104–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson D (1987) An extraction method for measuring microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viti C, Giovannetti L (2001) The impact of chromium contamination on soil heterotrophic and photosynthetic microorganisms. Ann Microbiol 51:201–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LP, Wang YJ, Bai YL, Fan FL, Wang L, Yan-Li LU, Zhou LP (2016) Research focus and prospect for application of biogas residue to agricultural land. J Agric Sci Technol 18:171–176 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayed AM, Terry N (2003) Chromium in the environment: factors affecting biological remediation. Plant Soil 249:139–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu GB, Xue S, Song ZL (2011) Rhizosphere soil microbial activity under different vegetation types on the loess plateau, China. Geoderma 161:115–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu GB, Song ZL, Wang J, Guo L (2018) Interactions of soil bacteria and fungi with plants during long-term grazing exclusion in semiarid grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 124:47–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng GD, Gao D, Chen TB, Luo W (2007) Stabilization of nickel and chromium in sewage sludge during aerobic composting. J Hazard Mater 142:216–221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41701556, 41771554), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501707), the Chinese University Scientific Fund (2452017111), and the Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2015BAC01B03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 98 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Z., Fang, L., Wang, J. et al. Use of biogas solid residue from anaerobic digestion as an effective amendment to remediate Cr(VI)-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 13041–13053 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04786-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04786-y

Keywords

Navigation