Abstract
This technical note introduces a reservoir operation model based on implicit stochastic optimization (ISO) in which the release policy is guided by the forecast of the mean inflow for a given future horizon rather than by the prediction of the current-month inflow, such as in typical ISO models. The model also does not require the forecast of all inflows for the future horizon and shows to be more efficient in finding less vulnerable release policies when compared to several other explicit and implicit stochastic procedures.
Notes
Note that the use of mean inflow will not increase the accuracy of the forecast but its value will be arguably easier to estimate. It should be less problematic to estimate a single value than a good sequence of inflow values.
This was already expected since the SOP maximizes the reliability (percentage of non-failure periods) at the expense of providing more vulnerability (magnitude of failures) (Hashimoto et al. 1982).
References
Celeste AB, Billib M (2009) Evaluation of stochastic reservoir operation optimization models. Adv Water Resour 32(9):1429–1443. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.06.008
Celeste AB, Billib M (2010) The role of spill and evaporation in reservoir optimization models. Water Resour Manage 24(4):617–628. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9468-4
Celeste AB, Curi WF, Curi RC (2009) Implicit stochastic optimization for deriving reservoir operating rules in semiarid Brazil. Pesqui Oper 29(1):223–234. doi:10.1590/S0101-74382009000100011
Draper AJ, Lund JR (2004) Optimal hedging and carryover storage value. J Water Resour Plan Manage 130(1):83–87. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(83)
Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20. doi:10.1029/WR018i001p00014
Jang J-SR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Systems, Man Cybern 23(3):665–685. doi:10.1109/21.256541
Koutsoyiannis D, Economou A (2003) Evaluation of the parameterization-simulation-optimization approach for the control of reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 39(6):1170. doi:10.1029/2003WR002148
Mehta R, Jain SK (2009) Optimal operation of a multi-purpose reservoir using neuro-fuzzy technique. Water Resour Manage 23(3):509–529. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9286-0
Mousavi SJ, Ponnambalam K, Karray F (2005) Reservoir operation using a dynamic programming fuzzy rule-based approach. Water Resour Manage 19(5):655–672. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-3275-3
Rani D, Moreira MM (2010) Simulation-optimization modeling: a survey and potential application in reservoir systems operation. Water Resour Manage 24(6):1107–1138. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9488-0
Shiau JT, Lee HC (2005) Derivation of optimal hedging rules for a water-supply reservoir through compromise programming. Water Resour Manage 19(2):111–132. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-1502-6
Shih J-S, ReVelle C (1994) Water-supply operations during drought: continuous hedging rule. J Water Resour Plan Manage 120(5):613–629. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1994)120:5(613)
You J-Y, Cai X (2008) Determining forecast and decision horizons for reservoir operations under hedging policies. Water Resour Res 44(W11430). doi:10.1029/2008WR006978
Acknowledgements
The first author greatly acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and its Georg Forster Research Fellowship program for the financial support received in order to carry out this research in Germany. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions to improve the presentation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Celeste, A.B., Billib, M. Improving Implicit Stochastic Reservoir Optimization Models with Long-Term Mean Inflow Forecast. Water Resour Manage 26, 2443–2451 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0025-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0025-1