Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping Urban Water Demands Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multi-criteria spatial data analysis method is presented to seek and model major determinants of future growth of urban water demands based on the urban growth trend by a case study performed in the city of Mytilene (Lesvos island) in north-eastern Aegean archipelagos, Greece. Domestic water use/demand is a complex element of socio-economic and physical characteristics, urban planning strategies, infrastructures and public water policies. Under a GIS environment, these factors correspond to different thematic layers, such as road network distance, distance from the city centre, distance from the coastline, topographic slope, land use/land cover, General Urban Plan of Mytilene, areas in which buildings with less than two storeys are allowed, the respective areas of buildings with more than two storeys, present population density and existing water supply and sewerage system. The Analytical Hierarchy Process applied in the evaluation of these factors led to spatial potential water demand map, which was classified into five priority zones. Results showed that a large percentage of the study area was identified as very high and high priority areas for future domestic water demand. The applied method was verified against the prepared maps showing the varying rates of water consumption and active water connections. The comparative evaluation of these maps validated the accuracy of the proposed method which can be used by the local officials of Mytilene in adopting policies and strategies aiming towards sustainable water resource management and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Subhi Al-Harbi KM (2001) Application of the AHP in project management. Int J Proj Manag 19:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos EP, Petalas C, Pisinaras V (2005) Water resources planning using the AHP and PROMETHEE multicriteria methods: the case of Nestos river—Greece. In: Proceedings of the 7th Balkan Conference on Operational Research (BALCOR 2005), Constanta, Romania, May. http://fmi.unibuc.ro/balkan-conf/CD/Section4/ANAGNOSTOPOULOS-PETALAS-PISINARAS.pdf

  • Athanasiadis I, Mentes A, Mitkas P, Mylopoulos YA (2005) A hybrid agent-based model for estimating residential water demand. Simulation 81:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Kelepertsis A, Alexakis D, Chrisanthaki I, Archonti D (2008) Environmental research of groundwater in the urban and suburban areas of Attica region, Greece. Environ Geol 56(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos GD, Gaki-Papanastassiou K, Skilodimou HD, Papanastassiou D, Chousianitis KG (2011) Potential suitability for urban planning and industry development using natural hazard maps and geological–geomorphological parameters. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1263-x

  • Baumann DD, Boland JJ, Hanemann WM (1998) Urban water demand management and planning. McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougadis J, Adamowski K, Diduch R (2005) Short-term municipal water demand forecasting. Hydrol Process 19:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Adger WN, Tompkins E, Bacon P, Shim D, Young K (2001) Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecol Econ 37(3):417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Lanson L, Michelen AM (2004) Group decision making in water recourses planning using multiple objective analysis. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 130(1):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera E, Cobacho R, Estruch V, Aznar J (2011) Analytical hierarchical process (AHP) as a decision support tool in water resources management. J Water Supply Res T 60(6):343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Masser I (2003) Urban growth pattern modelling: a case study of Wuhan city, PR China. Landscape Urban Plan 62(4):199–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuntian C, Chau KW (2002) Three-person multi-objective conflict decision in reservoir flood control. Eur J Oper Res 142:625–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihakova I (2006) Expected development in the supply and distribution of drinking water in Czech Republic. In: Pollert J, Dedus B (eds) Security of water supply system: from source to tap. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 31–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ECI (2004) Expert Choice Inc. http://www.expertchoice.com

  • Foukh ML (2001) Decision-support system for domestic water demand forecasting and management. Water Resour Manag 15(6):363–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemitzi A, Petalas C, Tsihrintzis VA, Pisinaras V (2006) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environ Geol 49(5):653–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemitzi A, Tsihrintzis VA, Voudrias E, Petalas C, Stravodimos G (2007) Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques and fuzzy logic in siting MSW landfills. Environ Geol 51(5):97–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibney R, Shang J (2007) Decision making in academia: a case of the dean selection process. Math Comput Model 46(7–8):1030–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21(9):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera M, Torgo L, Izquierdo J, Pèrez-García R (2010) Predictive models for forecasting hourly urban water demand. J Hydrol 387(1–2):141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Sun LX (2005) Economic and societal changes in China and their effects on water use—a scenario analysis. J Ind Ecol 9(1–2):187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers: climate change 2007: climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working group II: contribution to the international panel on climate change fourth assessment report. IPCC, Geneva

  • Jain A, Varshney K, Joshi UC (2001) Short-term water demand forecast modelling at IIT Kanpur using artificial neural networks. Water Resour Manag 15(5):299–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert AR, Leiman A, de Klerk HM, Katau S, Aggenbach JC (1997) Fynbos vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost benefit analysis. Ecol Econ 22:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas DP, Kollias VJ, Karantounias G (2003) A GIS for the assessment of the spatio-temporal changes of the Kotychi lagoon, western Peloponnese, Greece. Water Resour Manag 17(1):19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinoni O (2004) Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 30(6):637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei X, Rosso R, Huang GL, Nie GS (1989) Application of analytical hierarchy process to water resources policy and management in Beijing, China. Closing the gap between theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the Baltimore Symposium, May, IAHS Publ. 180:73–83

  • Mustajoki J, Hämäläinen RP, Marttunen M (2004) Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: a case of lake regulation policy. Environ Modell Softw 19(6):537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeltjenbruns H, William J, Kolarik WJ, Schnadt-Kirschner R (1995) Strategic planning in manufacturing systems—AHP application to an equipment replacement decision. Int J Prod Econ 38(2–3):189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos G, Lambrakis N (2006) The contribution of time series analysis to the study of the hydrodynamic characteristics of the karst systems: application on two typical karst aquifers of Greece (Trifilia, Almyros Creta). J Hydrol 329(3–4):368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos GP, Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2006) Optimization of DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J 14(6):894–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlikakis GE, Tsihrintzis VA (2003) A quantitative method for accounting human opinion, preferences and perceptions in ecosystem management. J Environ Manage 68(2):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polebitski AS, Palmer RN (2010) Seasonal residential water demand forecasting for census tracts. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 136(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan P (2003) Water demand forecast and management modeling: an application to Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Unpublished master’s thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Pulido-Calvo I, Gutièrrez-Estrada JC (2009) Linear regressions and neural approaches to water demand forecasting in irrigation districts with telemetry systems. Biosyst Eng 102(2):202–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KHVD (2005) Multi-criteria spatial decision analysis for forecasting urban water requirements: a case study of Dehradun city, India. Landscape Urban Plan 71(2–4):163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin P, Hansen E, Zhu Z, Stavisky D (1992) Simulation of water supply and demand in the aral sea region. Water Int 17(2):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma RF (1996) Structure and support of water resources management and decision-making. J Hydrol 177(3–4):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD (2011) Comparison of the implementation of Rock Engineering System (RES) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods, based on landslide susceptibility maps, compiled in GIS environment. A case study from the Eastern Achaia County of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 63(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty L (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:2–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2006) Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/ network processes. Eur J Oper Res 168:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Medeiros Y, Srdjevic Z, Schaer M (2002) Evaluating management strategies in Paraguacu river basin by analytic hierarchy process. In: Rizzoli AE, Jakeman AJ (eds) Integrated assessment and decision support, First Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, iEMSs: Manno, Switzerland, pp 42–47

  • Tabesh M, Dini M (2009) Fuzzy and neuro-fuzzy models for short-term water demand forecasting in Tehran. Iranian J Sci Technol B 33:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M, Paritsis S, Alexakis D (2009) Assessing the water potential of karstic saline springs by applying a fuzzy approach: the case of Almyros (Heraklion, Crete). Desalination 237:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsihrintzis VA, Hamid R, Fuentes HR (1996) Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in water resources: a review. Water Resour Manag 10(4):251–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udovyk O (2006) GIS for intergrated water resourses management. In: Hlavinek P, Kukharchyk T, Marsalek J, Mahrikova (eds) Integrated Urban Water Resources Management, Springer, The Netherlands, pp 35–42

  • Van Gauwenberg N, Pinte D, Tilmant A, Frances I, Pulido-Bosch A, Vanclooster M (2008) Multi-objective, multiple participant decision support for water management in Andax catchment, Almeria. Environ Geol 54:479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisser D (2004) Water management methodologies for water deficient regions in Southern Europe, http://environ.chemeng.ntua.gr/WSM/Uploads/Deliverables/ThirdYear/Deliverable_21_3.pdf

  • Yin YY, Huang GH, Hipel KW (1999) Fuzzy relation analysis for multicriteria water resources management. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 125(1):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Abrishamchi A, Ardakanian R (2008) Multi-criteria decision making for integrated urban water management. Water Resour Manag 22(8):1017–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SL, McMahon TA, Walton A, Lewis J (2002) Forecasting operational demand for an urban water supply zone. J Hydrol 259:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Panagiotis Andrikos and Georgios Tataris for their work in data processing. The Municipal Water Supply and Sewerage Company of Mytilene are gratefully acknowledged for the provision of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Water Resources Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Messolonghi, Nea Ktiria, 30200, Messolonghi, Greece

    George P. Panagopoulos

  2. Department of Geography & Climatology, Faculty of Geology & Geoenvironment, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus, 15784, Zografou, Athens, Greece

    George D. Bathrellos & Hariklia D. Skilodimou

  3. Department of Marine Science, University of the Aegean, 81100, Mytilene, Greece

    Faini A. Martsouka

Authors
  1. George P. Panagopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George D. Bathrellos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hariklia D. Skilodimou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Faini A. Martsouka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George P. Panagopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panagopoulos, G.P., Bathrellos, G.D., Skilodimou, H.D. et al. Mapping Urban Water Demands Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS. Water Resour Manage 26, 1347–1363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9962-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9962-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation