Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of households on purpose of keeping, trait preference, and production constraints for selected goat types in Ethiopia

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was carried out to understand the needs and perception of goat keepers in selected areas of Ethiopia in order to identify the breeding objectives, traits of preference, and production constraints that may be required in designing improvement programs. The study was conducted in three districts (Bati, Meta, and Kebri-Beyah) representing the lowland crop–livestock (LLCL), highland cereal–livestock (HLCL), and pastoral/agropastoral (P/AP) systems, respectively. The study targeted the three goat types (Bati, Hararghe Highland, and Short-eared Somali) found in Ethiopia. Households in all systems considered meat production, milk production, and income generation as major purpose of keeping goats. However, those in the low rainfall and arid environments of P/AP systems gave high ranking to adaptability to harsh environments and also to building social and religious values. In LLCL and HLCL systems, goat skin and manure were more valued than in P/AP systems. Principally, in P/AP systems, the awareness of households to skin utilization and marketing was very low. Despite diverse multiple breeding objectives identified, household breeding practices were affected by constraints related to disease prevalence, feed shortage and water scarcity, and lack of awareness on skin management, utilization, and marketing. Thus, designing and implementing of sustainable goat improvement programs is an overriding priority and should take into account the breeding objectives and knowledge of goat keepers in all production systems. Along with the breed improvement, a strategy should also be devised to enhance the utilization and marketing of goat skin at all levels of production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, R.M., Gupta, U.D., Sehgal, J.P. and Singh, M., 1996. Coat characteristics of goats in relation to heat tolerance in the hot tropics. Small Ruminant Research, 18, 245–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, M., 2000. Development potential and constraints of hides and skins marketing in Ethiopia. In: R.C. Merkel, G. Abebe and A.L. Goetsch (eds), Proceedings of a conference on opportunities and challenges of enhancing goat production in East Africa. 10 to 12 November 2000, Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia. E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK.

  • Ahuya, C.O., Okeyo, A.M., Mwangi-Njuru and Peacock, C., 2005. Development challenges and opportunities in the goat industry: The Kenya experience. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akloweg, N. and Workneh, A., 2004. Observation on the effect of salt and stocking periods on putrefaction in preserving sheep skin at three altitudes in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). August 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 121–127.

  • Alexandre, G., Aumont, G., Mainaud, J.C., Fleury, J. and Naves, M., 1999. Reproductive performances of Guadeloupean Creole goats during the suckling period. Small Ruminant Research, 34, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amer, P.R., Mpofu, N. and Bondoc, O., 1998. Definition of breeding objectives for sustainable production systems. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 11–16 January 1998, Armidale, Australia. 97–104.

  • Ayalew, W., Rischkowsky, B., King, J.M. and Bruns, E., 2003. Crossbreds did not generate more net benefits than indigenous goats in Ethiopian smallholdings. Agricultural Systems, 76, 1137–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, H.G., Moll, H.A.J. and Udo, H.M.J., 1997. Measuring and Interpreting the Benefits of Goat keeping in Tropical Farm Systems. Agricultural Systems, 53, 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempfle, L. and Jaitner, J., 2000. Case study about the N’Dama breeding programme at the International Trypanotolerance Centre (ITC) in The Gambia. In S. Galal, J. Boyazoglu and K. Hammond (eds), Proceedings of theWorkshop on Developing Breeding Strategies for Lower Input Animal Production Environments. 22–25 September 1999, Bella, Italy. ICAR Technical Series 3, 347–354.

  • Devendra, C., 2001. Smallholder dairy production systems in developing countries: characteristics, potential and opportunities for improvement. A review. Asian–Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 14, 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • FARM-Africa, 1996. Goat Types of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Physical description and management systems. Published jointly by FARM-Africa, London, UK and International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. 76pp.

  • Gatenby, R.M., 1986. Sheep Production in the Tropics and Sub-tropics. Longman Inc., New York. 351pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipson, T.A., 1998. Current market trends and potentials for meat goat production. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimmy, S., David, M., Donald, K. R. and Dennis, M., 2010. Smallholder Goat Breeding Systems in Humid, Sub-Humid and Semi Arid Agro-Ecological Zones of Uganda. Global Veterinaria, 4:3, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosgey, I.S., 2004. Breeding Objectives and Breeding Strategies for Small Ruminants in the Tropics. (unpublished PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands).

  • Kosgey, I.S. and Okeyo, A.M., 2007. Genetic improvement of small ruminants in low-input, smallholder production systems: Technical and infrastructural issues. Small Ruminant Research, 70, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosgey, I.S., van Arendonk, J.A.M., Udo, H.M.J. and Baker, R.L., 2006. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programs in the tropics: a review. Small Ruminant Research, 61, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosgey, I.S., Rowlands, G.J., van Arendonk, J.A.M. and Baker, R.L., 2008. Small ruminant production in smallholder and pastoral/extensive production systems in Kenya. Small Ruminant Research, 77, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markos, T., 2006. Productivity and Health of Indigenous Sheep Breeds and Crossbreds in the Central Ethiopian Highlands. (unpublished PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden).

  • Mengistu, U., Kristina D. and Kerstin, O., 2007. Effect of intermittent watering on growth, thermoregulation and behaviour of Ethiopian Somali goat kids. Small Ruminant Research, 72, 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand-Fehr, P., Boutonnet, J.P., Devendra, C., Dubeuf, J.P., Haenlein, G.F.W., Holst, P., Mowlem, L. and Capote, J., 2004. Strategy for goat production in the 21st century. Small Ruminant Research, 51, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Agriculture. 2010. Agricultural report for 2010. (Unpublished reports from Bati, Meta and Kebri-Beyah Wereda agricultural offices, Ethiopia).

  • Peacock, C., 2005. Goats as a pathway out of poverty. Small Ruminant Research, 60, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, C. and Sherman, D.M., 2010. Sustainable goat production-Some global perspectives. Small Ruminant Research, 89, 70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, K., Swart, D., Olivier, B. and Hallowell, G., 2000. An evaluation of the breeding strategies used in the development of the Dorper sheep and the improved Boar goat of South Africa. In: S. Galal, J. Boyazoglu and K.Hammond (eds), Workshop on Developing Breeding Strategies for Lower Input Animal Production Environments, 22–25 September 1999, Bella, Italy, ICAR Technical Series 3, 339–346.

  • SAS, 2003. SAS for window, Release 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

  • Solomon, G., Azage, T., Berhanu, G. and Dirk, H., 2010. Sheep and goat production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: Characteristics and strategies for improvement. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 23. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya. 58pp.

  • Stosic, P., 1994. Biological factors influencing the nature of goat skins and leather. (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leicester, England).

  • Tsedeke K., Girma A., Azage T. and Berhanu G., 2011. Marketing value-chain of smallholder sheep and goats in crop-livestock mixed production system of Alaba, Southern Ethiopia. Small Ruminant Research, 96, 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, G.M., Armour, J., Duncan, J.L., Dunn, A.M. and Jennings, F.W., 1996. Veterinary Parasitology, 2nd ed., Blackwell Science Ltd, UK. 141–205.

  • von Wielligh, W., 2001. The Damara sheep as adapted sheep breed in Southern Africa.. Proceedings of the Workshop on Community-Based Management of Animal Genetic Resources. 7–11 May 2001, Mbabane, Swaziland. 173–175.

  • Wollny, C.B.A., Banda, J.W., Mlewah, T.F.T. and Phoya, R.K.D., 2002. The lessons of livestock improvement failure: revising breeding strategies for indigenous Malawi sheep? Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 19–23 August 2002, Montpellier, France. 345–348.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Haramaya University-Swedish International (Sida) Cooperation for funding this research project. We thank Dr. Chris Beadle of CSIRO Australia for his help in editing and commenting on this article. The support of local extension staff, farmers, pastoralists, and agropastoralists during the data collection period in the study districts is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dereje Tadesse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tadesse, D., Urge, M., Animut, G. et al. Perceptions of households on purpose of keeping, trait preference, and production constraints for selected goat types in Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod 46, 363–370 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0497-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0497-x

Keywords

Navigation