Skip to main content
Log in

Identification systems and selection criteria for small ruminants among pastoralist communities in northern Kenya: prospects for a breeding programme

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data on animal identification systems and selection criteria for sheep and goats were collected from the Rendille and Gabra communities in northern Kenya. These were then analysed through computation of indices, which represented a weighted average of all rankings of a particular trait or identification system. The three most important records kept were castration (index = 0.224), dates of birth (0.188) and entries into the flock (0.185). Identification was done through ear notching (0.409), branding (0.248), and coat colour of the animals (0.150). Characteristics with index ≥0.200 were considered more important and included big body size (Rendille, 0.260; Gabra, 0.251) and milk yield (Rendille, 0.206) for the buck’s dam. Big body size (Rendille, 0.264; Gabra, 0.245) and offspring quality (Rendille, 0.252; Gabra, 0.265) were considered important attributes for the buck’s sire. Important qualities for the ram’s dam were big body size (Rendille, 0.246; Gabra, 0.216), offspring quality (Rendille, 0.200; Gabra, 0.235), fat deposition (0.233) among the Rendille and drought tolerance (0.246) among the Gabra. For the rams’ sire, big body size (Rendille, 0.235; Gabra, 0.233), offspring quality (Rendille, 0.200; Gabra, 0.235) and fat deposition (Rendille, 0.203; Gabra, 0.220) were considered important. The results from this study imply that pedigree and performance recording have been practiced through own intricate knowledge and that pastoralists have deliberate selection criteria. This information is the cornerstone in the establishment of appropriate breeding programmes in the slowly changing pastoral systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayantunde, A.A., Kango, M., Hiernaux, P., Udo, H.M.J., Tabo, R., 2007. Herders’ perceptions on ruminant livestock breeds and breeding management in southwestern Niger. Human Ecology 35, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAGRIS, 2010. Domestic animal Genetic Resources Information System (DAGRIS). In: Kemp, S., Mamo, Y., Asrat, Y., Dessie, T. (Eds.), International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. http://www.dagris.ilri.cgiar.org. Last accessed on 6th April, 2010.

  • FAO, 2007. The state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture, Rischkowsky, B., Pilling, D. (Eds.), Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 511pp.

  • Gwaze, F.R., Chimonyo, M., Dzama, K., 2009. Communal goat production in Southern Africa: a review. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 1157–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosgey, I.S., Okeyo, A.M., 2007. Genetic improvement of small ruminants in low-input, smallholder production systems: technical and infrastructural issues. Small Ruminant Research 70, 76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosgey, I.S., Baker, R.L., Udo, H.M.J., van Arendonk, J.A.M., 2006. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: a review. Small Ruminant Research 61, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, I., Legarra, A., Aguilar, I., 2009. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4648–4655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, A., Nayga, R., 2010. Trends in consumption, production, and trade in livestock and livestock products. Island Press, Washingston, DC 20009, 401 pp

  • SAS 1998. SAS User Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sölkner, J., Grausgruber, H., Okeyo, A.M., Ruckenbauer, P., Wurzinger, M., 2008. Breeding objectives and the relative importance of traits in plant and animal breeding: a comparative review. Euphytica 161, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabbaa, M.J., Al-Atiyat, R., 2009. Breeding objectives, selection criteria and factors influencing them for goat breeds in Jordan. Small Ruminant Research 84, 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Egerton University (Njoro, Kenya), the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (Nairobi, Kenya) and ILRI-BMZ-Hohenheim-Göttingen Collaborative Project on Improving the Livelihoods of Poor Livestock Keepers in Africa Through Community-Based Management of Indigenous Farm Animal Genetic Resources” for the provision of facilities and support. Our gratitude is to the many pastoralists who shared with us their experiences and plight.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Kahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mbuku, S.M., Kosgey, I.S. & Kahi, A.K. Identification systems and selection criteria for small ruminants among pastoralist communities in northern Kenya: prospects for a breeding programme. Trop Anim Health Prod 42, 1487–1492 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9584-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9584-4

Keywords

Navigation