Abstract
A survey of pastoralist and agropastoralist households in south-east Kenya was conducted to determine their production objectives and management strategies in order to optimize and extend a breeding programme for indigenous small East African Shorthorn Zebu cattle. The reasons for keeping cattle and the breed/trait preferences identified reflect the multiple objectives of the livestock keepers, with both adaptive traits and productive/reproductive traits rated as important. Although the Maasai and Kamba zebu (M&KZ) breeds were ranked highly with regard to adaptive traits, the population is considered to have been in decline over recent years. In order to promote the conservation and sustainable use of the M&KZ cattle, the formation of an open nucleus breeding scheme is recommended. In particular, such a scheme would be able to address several existing constraints (e.g. individual herds are very small and communal use of pastures/water makes controlled mating difficult). Such interventions would require the full participation of the livestock keepers, as well as ensuring that a holistic approach to species and breed attributes is taken into account in setting breeding goals, such that the full array of contributions that livestock make to livelihoods and the genetic characteristics related to these contributions are fully incorporated into the programme.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CBPP:
-
contagious bovine pleuropneumonia
- DRSK:
-
Dairy Recording Services of Kenya
- ECF:
-
East coast fever
- FMD:
-
foot and mouth disease
- KARI:
-
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute
- KES:
-
Kenya shilling(s)
- KSB:
-
Kenya Stud Book
- M&KS:
-
Maasai and Kamba Zubu breeds
- ONBS:
-
open nucleus breeding scheme
- SEAZ:
-
small East African Shorthorn Zebu
References
Anderson, S., 2003. Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecological Economics, 45(3), 331–339
Ayalew, W., King, J., Bruns, E. and Rischkowsky, B., 2003. Economic evaluation of smallholder subsistence livestock production: lessons from an Ethiopian goat development program. Ecological Economics, 45(3), 473–485
Bebe, B.O., Udo, H.M.J., Rowlands, G.J. and Thorpe, W., 2003. Smallholder dairy systems in the Kenya highlands: breed preferences and breeding practices. Livestock Production Science, 82, 117–127
FAO, 2000. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity, 3rd edn, B. Scherf (ed.), (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome)
Jabbar, M.A., Swallow, B.M. and Rege, J.E.O., 1999. Incorporation of farmer knowledge and preferences in designing breeding policy and conservation strategy for domestic animals. Outlook on Agriculture, 28(4), 239–243
Jaetzold, R. and Schmidt, H., 1983. Farm Management Handbook of Kenya: vol. IIC, East Kenya, vol. IIB, Central Kenya. Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information, (Ministry of Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya)
Jaitner, J., Corr, N. and Dempfle, L., 2003. Ownership pattern and management practices of cattle herds in The Gambia: implications for a breeding programme. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35(2), 179–187
Rege, J.E.O., Kahi, A.K., Okomo-Adhiambo, M., Mwacharo, J. and Hanotte, O., 2001. Zebu Cattle of Kenya: Uses, Performance, Farmer Preferences, Measures of Genetic Diversity and Options for Improved Use, (Animal Genetic Resources Research 1; ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya)
Solkner, J., Nakimbugwe, H. and Valle Zarate, A., 1998. Analysis of determinants for success and failure of village breeding programmes. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, vol. 25, 273–281
Wollny, C.B.A., 2003. The need to conserve farm animal genetic resources in Africa: should policy makers be concerned? Ecological Economics, 45(3), 341–351
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mwacharo, J.M., Drucker, A.G. Production Objectives and Management Strategies of Livestock Keepers in South-East Kenya: Implications for a Breeding Programme. Trop Anim Health Prod 37, 635–652 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-005-4253-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-005-4253-8