Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of innovation studies has grown considerably in the last four decades, which has led to the emergence of new approaches and theoretical aspects that need to be examined and considered. Therefore, this paper aims to understand what are the main theoretical pillars that support the structure of innovation theories and fields, how it evolved over the years and what are the directions that lead to future trends in innovation research. The procedure consists in a mix-methods using the citation and co-citation analysis associated with bibliometric methods, Social Network Analysis, and a systematic review of the literature. The results were validated by Delphi with academic specialists in innovation. Considering publications between 1956 and 2016 divided into four 15-years timespan, the longitudinal analysis results indicate the evolution of the main streams of thoughts that support the current innovation research fields and depict a research orientation for future works that can be developed to generate relevant contributions for the theoretical development of the area. This paper differentiates itself bringing results based on a large database, by the research methods employed, and by the perspective adopted provides solid contributions to the understanding of the past, present, and future of the scientific research in innovation to business administration field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the year 2016, data were collected referring to the articles published until February 17th.

  2. Search formula with the use of Boolean operators: “(TS = Innovat*) AND ((WC = Management) OR (WC = Business) OR (WC = Economics) OR (WC = Business, Finance) OR (SU = Business & Economics)) AND (SU = Business & Economics) AND LANGUAGE: (English) AND DOCUMENT TYPES: (Article).

    Indexes = SSCI Timespan = All years”, being: TS = Topic (includes the search for titles, abstracts, keywords, and additional keywords; WC = Web of Science Categories; SU = Research Area, Language = Only articles in the English language; and Document types = Only articles (excluding reviews, books, editorials, among others).

  3. The core collection of Web of Science (Web of ScienceTM Core Collection) was chosen because it contains a complete set of available data from each reference, including the references cited in each paper, important for the later stage that will use these data for the co-citation analysis.

  4. Keywords Plus® are keywords with indexing terms created by Thompson Reuters. These terms are derived from the titles of the articles cited by the author of the article that was indexed. The “Keywords Plus®” broadens search results by keywords or titles (See http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS521R5/help/WOS/hp_full_record.html).

  5. Although the seminal works of Schumpeter (1939, 1942) were not included in the sample, primarily because they are books, and secondly, because they are publications prior to the year of beginning the collection of articles published in innovation, Schumpeter appears in a relevant way in the citations analysis, highlighting the importance of this technique of analysis, which allows us to gather the core literature used as reference by the scientific production in the field of innovation.

  6. The journal Technovation was created in 1981, within the second period under analysis, when it released its first volume. However, it emerged among the twenty best periodicals in the innovation area in the 4th period, occupying the 4th position in the ranking with a CV of 2.2%.

References

Top 20 papers most citated currently [1956–1970]

Top 20 papers most citated currently [1971–1985]

Top 20 papers most citated currently [1986–2000]

Top 20 papers most citated currently [2001–2016]

Top 20 Key-References [1956–1970]

  • Carter, C. F., & Williams, B. R. (1958). Investment in innovation. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20(4), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enos, J. L. (1962). Invention and innovation in the petroleum refining industry. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 299-322). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 25(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habakkuk, H. J. (1962). American and British technology in the nineteenth century: The search for labour-saving inventions. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1932). The theory of wages (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, J. (1958). The Sources of Invention: Macmillan.

  • Katz, E. (1961). The social itinerary of technical change: Two studies on the diffusion of innovation. Human Organization, 20(2), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.20.2.322v6303331k1x37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. E. (1963). A study of technological innovation: The evolution of digital computers. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellow University Pittsburg, PA.

  • Maclaurin, W. R., & Harman, R. J. (1949). Invention & innovation in the radio industry. Basingstoke: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Oxford: Wiley Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1961). Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica, 29(4), 741–766. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911817.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1963a). Intrafirm rates of diffusion of an innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 45(4), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1963c). The speed of response of firms to new techniques. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77(2), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1959). The economics of invention: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Business, 32(2), 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, W. E. G. (1960). Productivity and technical change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Top 20 Key-References [1971–1985]

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation (2nd ed.). Champaign: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1974). The economics of industrial innovation. Universidade da Califórnia: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 25(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langrish, J. (1972). Wealth from knowledge: Studies of innovation in industry. Halstead Press Division, Wiley.

  • Mansfield, E. (1961). Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica, 29(4), 741–766. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911817.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1968). Industrial research and technological innovation: An econometric analysis. Norton, NY: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Oxford: Wiley Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of innovation in organizations. The American Political Science Review, 63(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S. (1971). Innovative behavior and communication. Madison: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1967). Technology and change: The new Heraclitus. New York: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, J. E. (1971). International diffusion of technology: The case of semiconductors (Vol. 4). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. (1974). Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology. Science, 183(4125), 620–626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4125.620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega—International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Top 20 Key-References [1986–2000]

  • Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation (2nd ed.). Champaign: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and companies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (2nd edn.). New York.

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Books Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Cambridge, MA.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. In D. Faulkner (Ed.), Strategy: Critical perspectives on business and management (The Future, Vol. 4, pp. 106–118). London: Routledge.

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Top 20 Key-References [2001–2016]

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all reviewers and people who contributed with their suggestions and feedbacks. I gratefully acknowledge the support and generosity of the National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education—CAPES from the Brazilian Ministry of Education (Grant No. 021.535.379-08/2014-2017, and Grant No. 88881.131969/2016-01), without which the present study could not have been completed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennys Eduardo Rossetto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossetto, D.E., Bernardes, R.C., Borini, F.M. et al. Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis. Scientometrics 115, 1329–1363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Navigation