Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Student Teachers’ Understanding of the Terminology, Distribution, and Loss of Biodiversity: Perspectives from a Biodiversity Hotspot and an Industrialized Country

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The loss of biodiversity is one of the most urgent global environmental problems of our time. Public education and awareness building is key to successful biodiversity protection. Knowledgeable and skilled student teachers are a key component for the successful implementation of biodiversity education in schools. Yet, little empirical evidence exists on teachers’ detailed understanding of biodiversity. This study aimed to assess student teachers’ conceptions of the terminology as well as their understanding of the distribution and loss of biodiversity. Data were collected from a qualitative in-depth interview study of student biology teachers from Costa Rica and Germany (n = 24). Both verbal and visual methods were used to elicit responses. The results show that participants from both countries equated biodiversity with species diversity and had misconceptions about genetic diversity. Costa Rican student teachers seemed to have a more local perspective on biodiversity and unanimously described their local biodiversity as high, and under threat. In contrast, German teachers showed a more global view and were mostly uncertain about the level and threat status of local biodiversity. Prevailing associations explaining the global distribution and loss of biodiversity were heavily based on everyday assumptions, such as the presence/absence of humans, cities, and industries. Additionally, the transnational character of many of the socioeconomic drivers causing biodiversity loss was largely neglected. Although most participants were unfamiliar with the scientific concept of biodiversity hotspots, they implicitly used a naive biodiversity hotspots concept to explain the distribution and loss of global biodiversity. The results are discussed in terms of the educational implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlberg, M., & Lehmuskallio, J. (2007). Promoting biodiversity education both locally and globally. “Biodiversität lernen - eine didaktische Herausforderung” ‘[Learning biodiversity -- an educational challenge’] (pp. 1–8). Vienna, Austria: AECC-Bio.

  • Alerby, E. (2000). A way of visualising children’s and young people’s thoughts about the environment: a study of drawings. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameh, C. O., & Gunstone, R. F. (1988). The understanding held by Nigerian science teachers of some science concepts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (p. 25). New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED292633.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2012.

  • Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auswärtiges, Amt. (2010). Beziehungen zwischen Costa Rica und Deutschland [Relations between Costa Rica and Germany]. Federal Foreign Office Germany. Retrieved from http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Aussenpolitik/Laender/Laenderinfos/CostaRica/Bilateral_node.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • Ayres, E. (1998). World Watch Report: The fastest mass extinction in earth’s history. World Watch Magazine, 11(5), 6–7.

  • Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook for research on teacher education (pp. 437–448). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, R. H., & Rubba, P. A. (1992). A comparison of preservice and in-service earth and space science teachers’ general mental abilities, content knowledge, and problem-solving skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1021–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraza, L. (1999). Children’s drawings about the environment. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., et al. (2009). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, N. (2008). Environmental education in Costa Rica: building a framework for sustainable development? International Journal of Educational Development, 28(3), 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögeholz, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: recent German empirical contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J. F., Mittermeier, C. G., et al. (2006). Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science, 313(58), 58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs, A., Fischer, A., Rink, D., & Young, J. C. (2008). Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: understanding public representations of biodiversity. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 4(2), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (2003). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707–718). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: where culture and cognition create each other. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, G. (2008). Lehren und Lernen nachhaltig gestalten [Shaping teaching and learning sustainable]. Interview. Retrieved from http://www.goethe.de/ges/umw/dos/nac/ler/de3113206.htm. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • de Haan, G., Leicht, A., Krikser, T., & Franken, L. (2009). Die Umsetzung der UN-Dekade “Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung” in Deutschland -- eine Zwischenbilanz [The implementation of the UN Decade “Education for Sustainable Development” in Germany -- interim results]. Natur und Landschaft, 84(3), 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2004). New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 141–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmenli, M. (2010). Biology student teachers’ conceptual frameworks regarding biodiversity. Education, 130(3), 479–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: is affluence a prerequisite? Journal of Social Issues, 51(4), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekborg, M., & Areskoug, M. (2006). How student teacher’s understanding of the greenhouse effect develops during a teacher education programme. NorDiNa, 5, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esa, N. (2010). Environmental knowledge, attitude and practices of student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 19(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley, F. N., Stewart, J., & Yarroch, W. L. (1982). Teachers’ perceptions of important and difficult science content. Science Education, 66(4), 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation, 136(2), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. A. (2001). The demise of fieldwork as an integral part of science education in United Kingdom schools: a victim of cultural change and political pressure? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 9(1), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. (2000). Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature, 405(6783), 220–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayford, C. (2000). Biodiversity education: a teacher’s perspective. Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayford, C. (2001). Biodiversity reduction as a vehicle for exploring teacher thinking about issues in biological education. Retrieved from http://intl.concord.org/cbe/pdf/gayford.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols (2nd ed., p. 277). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H. W. (2005). Organisms in nature as a central focus for biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge, B., & Jenkins, M. D. (2002). World atlas of biodiversity: earth’s living resources in the 21st century (p. 360). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guier, E., Rodríguez, M., & Zúñiga, M. E. (2002). Educación ambiental en Costa Rica: tendencias evolutivas, perspectivas y desafios [Environmental education in Costa Rica: evolutionary trends, prospects and challenges] (p. 99). San José, Costa Rica: EUNED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila, Y., & Kouki, J. (1994). The phenomenon of biodiversity in conservation biology. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauslein, P. L., Good, R. G., & Cummins, C. L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: from science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 939–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, D. R. (1996). A historical perspective on problems in botany teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 58(6), 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl, K. D., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1995). Knowledge and perceptions in Costa Rica regarding environment, population, and biodiversity issues. Conservation Biology, 9(6), 1548–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl, K. D., Daily, G. C., Daily, S. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Bassin, S. (1999). Knowledge of and attitudes toward population growth and the environment: university students in Costa Rica and the United States. Environmental Conservation, 26(1), 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R., & Duncan, R. G. (2009). Student teachers’ images of science in ecology and genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 43(2), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassas, M. (2002). Environmental education: biodiversity. The Environmentalist, 22(4), 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, J. S. (1995). The importance of systematics in understanding the biodiversity crisis: the role of biological educators. Journal of Biological Education, 29(4), 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, T. (2001). Pre-service teachers’ misconceptions regarding three environmental issues. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1), 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design (2nd ed., p. 291). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler-Krischun, J., & Walter, A. M. (Eds.). (2007). National strategy on biological diversity (p. 178). Berlin: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburz-Graber, R., Hofer, K., & Wolfensberger, B. (2006). Studies on a socio-ecological approach to environmental education: a contribution to a critical position in the education for sustainable development discourse. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., Constantinou, C., Junge, X., Köhler, K., Mayer, J., Nagel, U., Raper, G., et al. (2009). The integration of biodiversity education in the initial education of primary school teachers: four comparative case studies from Europe. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., Constantinou, C., Lehnert, H.-J., Nagel, U., Raper, G., & Kadji-Beltran, C. (2011). Confidence and perceived competence of preservice teachers to implement biodiversity education in primary schools -- four comparative case studies from Europe. International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2247–2273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liversidge, T., Cochrane, M., Kerfoot, B., & Thomas, J. (2009). Teaching science: developing as a reflective secondary teacher (p. 259). London, UK: Sage.

  • Lock, R. (1997). Is there life in science 2000? Journal of Biological Education, 31(2), 83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, R. (2010). Biology fieldwork in schools and colleges in the UK: an analysis of empirical research from 1963 to 2009. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. H. (1985). Young children’s representations of the environment: a comparison of techniques. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(3), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2008). The loss of biodiversity as a challenge for sustainable development: how do pupils in Chile and Germany perceive resource dilemmas? Research in Science Education, 39(4), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2009). Biodiversität und Globales Lernen -- Ein neuer Forschungsbereich [Biodiversity and global learning -- a new research area]. In T. Lucker & O. Kölsch (Eds.), Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt -- Fokus: Globales Lernen [Nature conservation and biological diversity -- focus: global learning] (pp. 125–147). Bonn: BfN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michail, S., Stamou, A. G., & Stamou, G. P. (2007). Greek primary school teachers’ understanding of current environmental issues: an exploration of their environmental knowledge and images of nature. Science Education, 91(2), 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Hubermann, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed., p. 338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis (p. 100). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Retrieved from http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.354.aspx.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • MEP (Ministerio de Educación Pública). (2003). Programa de estudio -- Biología educación diversificada [Program of study -- biology specialized education] (p. 70). San José, Costa Rica: Ministerio de Educación Pública. Retrieved from http://www.educatico.ed.cr/ProgramasdeEstudio/Forms/AllItems.aspx. Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  • MEP (Ministerio de Educación Pública). (2005). Programa de estudio -- Ciencias III Ciclo [Program of study -- sciences third cycle] (p. 97). San José, Costa Rica: Ministerio de Educación Pública. Retrieved from http://www.educatico.ed.cr/ProgramasdeEstudio/Forms/AllItems.aspx. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • MINAE (Ministerio del Ambiente y Energía). (2000). Costa Rica: Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad (p. 151). San José, Costa Rica: Ministerio del Ambiente y Energía. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/doc/world/cr/cr-nbsap-01-p1-es.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G., Lamoreux, J., et al. (2004). Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions (p. 390). Mexico City: CEMEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, C., & Utley, J. (2008). An exploratory study of preservice teachers’ beliefs about the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(4), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, C., Desjean-Perrotta, B., & Utley, J. (2010). The Draw-An-Environment Test Rubric (DAET-R): exploring pre-service teachers’ mental models of the environment. Environmental Education Research, 16(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2003). Biologische Kenntnisse von Studienanfängern [Biological knowledge of freshmen]. Mathematischer und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht, 56(1), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S., & Gerhardt-Dircksen, A. (2000). Nur geringes Wissen über Ökologie -- eine empirische Studie [Only limited knowledge about ecology -- an empirical study]. Mathematischer und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht, 53(4), 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutke, J., & Barthlott, W. (2005). Geographic patterns of vascular plant diversity at continental to global scales. Biologiske Skrifter, 55(4), 521–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagra, V. (2010). Environmental education awareness among school teachers. The Environmentalist, 30(2), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novacek, M. J. (2008). Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(1), 11571–11578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obando, V. (2008). Biodiversidad en Costa Rica: Estado del conocimiento y gestión [Biodiversity in Costa Rica: state of knowledge and management] (p. 27). Heredia, Costa Rica: Editorial INBio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, G., Sharp, J., Johnsey, R., & Wright, D. (2012). Primary science: knowledge and understanding (6th ed., p. 217). London, UK: Sage.

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: an essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive process (p. 361). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, A. L. (2004). Teacher preparation for environmental education: faculty perspectives on the infusion of environmental education into preservice methods courses. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(3), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B. (2010). Essentials of conservation biology (5th ed., p. 601). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RoperASW. (2002). National Geographic -- Roper 2002 Global Geographic Literacy Survey (p. 72). Washington, DC: National Geographic Education Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nationalgeographic.com/geosurvey2002/download/RoperSurvey.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  • Sander, E., Jelemenská, P., & Kattmann, U. (2006). Towards a better understanding of ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, K., Schreier, A., & Richter, F. J. (Eds.), (2008). Biological diversity: educational and information materials (p. 96). Berlin: BMU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, M. L., Sevegnani, L., & André, P. (2007). Representações da Mata Atlântica e de sua biodiversidade por meio dos desenhos infantis [Representations of the Atlantic forest and its biodiversity through children’s drawings]. Ciência & Educação, 13(3), 369–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Global biodiversity outlook 3 (p. 94). Montréal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • KMK (Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland) (Ed.) (2004). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards in biology for the intermediate school certificate] (p. 106). Berlin: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P. (2005). Student ideas: what is an environment? The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shymansky, J. A. (1992). Using constructivist ideas to teach science teachers about constructivist ideas, or teachers are students too! Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(2), 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigl, W. (2011). Hotspots der Biodiversität -- Krisenregionen der Natur [Biodiversity hotspots -- crisis regions of nature]. FWU Institut für Film und Bild: Ernst Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2004). Issues and trends in higher education biology fieldwork. Journal of Biological Education, 39(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. F. (2001). Environmental leadership in developing countries: transnational relations and biodiversity policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia (p. 280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., & Mant, J. (1995). A misconceived view of subject-matter knowledge in primary science education: a response to Golby et al. “Some researchers” understanding of primary teaching’. Research Papers in Education, 10(3), 303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., Kruger, C., Childs, A., & Mant, J. (2000). Primary school teachers’ understanding of environmental issues: an interview study. Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., Corney, G., & Childs, A. (2004). Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: the starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educational Research, 46(2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 623–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1992). High school biology teachers’ image of subject matter: an exploratory study. The American Biology Teacher, 54(4), 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilling, S., & Dillon, J. (2007). Initial teacher education and the outdoor classroom: standards for the future -- a report on the training of pre-service teachers to support the development of outdoor teaching in secondary science education (p. 20). London, UK: Field Studies Council/The Association for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, M. (2008). Hotspots: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. PBS Home Video.

  • Torkar, G. (2009). Biology teachers’ conceptions about nature and environment -- two fundamental concepts of education for sustainable development. Acta Biologica Slovenica, 52(1), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torkar, G., & Bajd, B. (2006). Trainee teachers’ ideas about endangered birds. Journal of Biological Education, 41(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak, S. C., Omland, K. S., Robinson, J. A., Lusk, J. J., Fleischner, T. L., Brown, G., & Domroese, M. (2004). Principles of conservation biology: recommended guidelines for conservation literacy from the Education Committee of the Society for Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology, 18(5), 1180–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1978). Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Tbilisi (USSR), 14–26 October 1977: Final Report. October (p. 96), Paris. Retrieved from http://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/EE-Tbilisi_1977.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010.

  • UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (p. 30). Rio de Janeiro: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urhahne, D. (2006). Ich will Biologielehrer (−in ) werden! -- Berufswahlmotive von Lehramtsstudierenden der Biologie [I want to become a biology teacher! -- biology education students’ motives of vocational choice]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 12, 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, D. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Weelie, D., & Wals, A. E. J. (2002). Making biodiversity meaningful through environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1143–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes (p. 159). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J. (2001). Biodiversity as a bridge between nature conservation education and EfS. Roots -- Botanic Gardens Conservation International Review, 23, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K. J., Gillson, L., & Knapp, S. (2007). Biodiversity hotspots through time: an introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1478), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: an analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on Biological Diversity (Ed.) (2011). Biological diversity and education for sustainable development -- key topics and starting points for educational programmes (p. 33). Bonn, Germany: German Commission for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, D.-Y. (1998a). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, D.-Y. (1998b). Teachers’ misconceptions of the circulatory system. Journal of Biological Education, 32(3), 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would particularly like to thank all the student teachers in Germany and Costa Rica for their time and effort in participating in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Biology/Chemistry, Didactics of Biology, Universität Osnabrück, Barbarastrasse 11, 49076, Osnabrück, Germany

    Florian Fiebelkorn & Susanne Menzel

Authors
  1. Florian Fiebelkorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Menzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Fiebelkorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiebelkorn, F., Menzel, S. Student Teachers’ Understanding of the Terminology, Distribution, and Loss of Biodiversity: Perspectives from a Biodiversity Hotspot and an Industrialized Country. Res Sci Educ 43, 1593–1615 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9323-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9323-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation