The Safe Dates Project is a randomized trial for evaluating a school-based adolescent dating violence prevention program. Five waves of data were used to examine the effects of Safe Dates over time including primary and secondary prevention effects, moderators, and mediators of program effects. Using random coefficients models, with multiple imputation of missing data, significant program effects were found at all four follow-up periods on psychological, moderate physical, and sexual dating violence perpetration and moderate physical dating violence victimization. Marginal effects were found on sexual victimization. Effects on severe physical perpetration at all four follow-up periods were moderated by prior involvement in that type of violence. Primary and secondary prevention effects were found and the program was equally effective for males and females and for whites and non-whites. Program effects were mediated by changes in dating violence norms, gender-role norms, and awareness of community services.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allison, P. D. (2000). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., O'Leary, K. D., & Cano, A. (1997). Efficacy of a dating violence prevention program on attitudes justifying aggression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 11–17.
Bergman, L. (1992). Dating violence among high school students. Social Work, 37, 21–27.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
Check, J., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.
Coker, A. L., McKeown, R. E., Sanderson, M., Davis, K. E., Valois, R. F., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Severe dating violence and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 220–227.
Deal, J. E., & Wampler, K. (1986). Dating violence: The primacy of previous experience. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 457–471.
Dusenbury, L., Falco, M., & Lake, A. (1997). A review of the evaluation of 47 drug abuse prevention curricula available nationally. Journal of School Health, 67, 127–132.
Figueredo, A. J., McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., & Sidani, S. (2000). Multivariate modeling of missing data within and across assessment waves. Addiction, 95(Supplement 3), S361–S380.
Finn, J. (1986). The relationship between sex role attitudes and attitudes supporting marital violence. Sex Roles, 14, 235–244.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Foshee, V. A., & Bauman, K. E. (1992). Gender stereotyping and adolescent sexual behavior: A test of temporal order. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1561–1579.
Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types, and injuries. Health Education Research, 11, 275–286.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45–50.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Greene, W. F., Koch, G. G., Linder, G. F., & MacDougall, J. E. (2000). The Safe Dates program: 1-Year follow-up results. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1619–1622.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Ennett, S., Linder, G. F., Benefield, T., & Suchindran, C. (2004). Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 619–624.
Horton, N. J., & Lipsitz, S. R. (2001). Multiple imputation in practice: Comparison of software packages for regression models with missing variables. The American Statistician, 55, 244–254.
Hotaling, G. T., & Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1(2), 101–124.
Jaffe, P.G., Sudermann, M., Reitzel, D., Killip, S. M. (1992). An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence and Victimization, 7, 129–146.
Jones L. E. (1991). The Minnesota School Curriculum Project: A statewide domestic violence prevention project in secondary schools. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger (pp. 258–266). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
Krajewski, S., Rybarik, M., Dosch, M., & Gilmore, G. (1996). Results of a curriculum intervention with seventh graders regarding violence in relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 93–112.
Lavoie, F., Vezina, L., Piche, C., & Boivin, M. (1995). Evaluation of a prevention program for violence in teen dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 516–524.
Lloyd, S. (1987). Conflict in premarital relationships: Differential perceptions of males and females. Family Relations, 36, 290–294.
Lloyd, S., Koval, J., & Cate, R. (1989). Conflict and violence in dating relationships. In M. Pirog-Good & J. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 126–142). New York: Preager.
Macgowan, M. J. (1997). An evaluation of a dating violence prevention program for middle school students. Violence and Victimization, 12, 223–235.
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181.
Malik, S., Sorenson, S. B., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1997). Community and dating violence among adolescents: perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 291–302.
Mizruchi, E. H., & Perrucci, R. (1962). Norm qualities and differential effects of deviant behavior: An exploratory analysis. American Sociological Review, 27, 391–399.
Murray, D. M., & Hannah. (1989). Design and analysis issues in the evaluation of lifestyle intervention studies. Preventive Medicine.
O'Keefe, M., & Treister, L., T. (1998). Victims of dating violence among high school students: Are predictors different for males and females? Violence Against Women, 4, 195–223.
O'Keeffe, N. K., Brockopp, K., & Chew, E. (1986). Teen dating violence. Social Work, 31, 465–468.
Patrician, P. A. (2002). Multiple imputation for missing data. Research in Nursing & Health, 25, 76–84.
Resnick, M. D., & Blum, R. W. (1985). Developmental and personalogical correlates of adolescent sexual behavior and outcomes. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 1, 293–313.
Roscoe, B., & Benaske, N. (1985). Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse. Family Relations, 34, 419–424.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys. New York: Wiley.
SAS (Version 8). (1999). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.
Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Mucci, L. A., & Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. JAMA, 286, 572–579.
Slaby, R. G., & Guerra, N. G. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 1. Assessment. Developmental Psychology, 24, 580–588.
Smith, J. P., & Williams, J. G. (1992). From abusive household to dating violence. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 153–165.
Solomon, S. D., & Harford, T. C. (1984). Drinking norms versus drinking behavior. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 8, 460–466.
Tallichet, S. E., & Willits, F. K. (1986). Gender-role attitude change of young women: Influential factors from a panel study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 219–227.
Weinstein, N. (1988). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 31–50.
Weisz, A. N., & Black, B. M. (2001). Evaluating a sexual assault and dating violence prevention program for urban youths. Social Work Research, 25, 89–100.
Wolfe, D. A., Wekerle, C., Scott, K., Straatman, A., Grasley, C., & Reitzel-Jaffe, D. (2003). Dating violence prevention with at-risk youth: A controlled outcome evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 279–291.
Worell, J. (1982). Psychological sex roles: Significance and change. In J. Worell (Ed.), Psychological development in the elementary years (pp. 3–44). New York: Academic Press.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cooperative Agreement Number U81/CCU409964. This study was reviewed and approved by The University of North Carolina, School of Public Health, Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects. Active parental consent and adolescent assent were obtained from all study adolescents.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foshee, V.A., Bauman, K.E., Ennett, S.T. et al. Assessing the Effects of the Dating Violence Prevention Program “Safe Dates” Using Random CoefficientRegression Modeling. Prev Sci 6, 245–258 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0