Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, crop production in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) depends primarily on mining soil nutrients. Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) is an approach for intensifying agriculture in SSA that aims at maximizing the agronomic efficiency (AE) of applied nutrient inputs. ISFM contains the following essential components: proper fertilizer management, use of improved varieties, the combined application of organic inputs and fertilizer, and adaptation of input application rates to within-farm soil fertility gradients where these are important. This paper evaluates, through meta-analysis, the impact of these components on the AE of fertilizer N (N-AE), defined as extra grain yield per kg fertilizer N applied, in maize-based systems in SSA. Since N-AE is low for excessive fertilizer N application rates or when fertilizer is applied on fertile, unresponsive soil, as was confirmed by scatter plots against control yields and fertilizer N application rates, such values were removed from the database in order to focus on and elucidate the more variable and complex responses under less than ideal conditions typical for SSA. Compared with local varieties, the use of hybrid maize varieties significantly increased N-AE values (17 and 26 kg (kg N)−1, respectively) with no differences observed between local and improved, open-pollinated varieties. Mixing fertilizer with manure or compost resulted in the highest N-AE values [36 kg (kg N)−1] while organic inputs of medium quality also showed significantly higher N-AE values compared with the sole fertilizer treatment but only at low organic input application rates (40 and 23 kg (kg N)−1, respectively). High quality organic inputs (Class I) and those with a high C-to-N ratio (Class III) or high lignin content (Class IV) did not affect N-AE values in comparison with the sole fertilizer treatment. Application of N fertilizer on infields resulted in significantly higher N-AE values [31 kg (kg N)−1] compared with the outfields [17 kg (kg N)−1]. The obtained information indicates that N-AE is amenable to improved management practices and that the various components embedded in the ISFM definition result in improvements in N-AE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abuja Fertilizer Summit (2006) Abuja Declaration on Fertilizer for African Green Revolution, African Union Special Summit of the Heads of State and Government, Abuja, Nigeria

  • Amanullah, Alkas LK (2009). Partial factor productivity, agronomic efficiency, and economic analyses of maize in wheat-maize cropping system in Pakistan. No. 46747. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings, Atlanta, Georgia, January31- February 3, 2009, 26 pp.

  • Ainsworth EA, Rosenburg MS, Wang X (2007) Meta-analysis: the past, present and future. New Phytol 176:752–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bationo A, Ayuk E, Ballo D, Kon´e M (1997) Agronomic and economic evaluation of Tilemsi phosphate rock in different agroecological zones of Mali. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 48:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinsinga B (2008) Reclaiming Policy Space: Lessons from Malawi’s 2005/2006 Fertilizer Subsidy Programme Future Agricultures. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning G, Kabambe P, Sanchez P, Malik A, Flor R, Harawa R, Nkhoma P, Zamba C, Banda C, Magombo C, Keating M, Wangila J, Sachs J (2009) Input Subsidies to Improve Smallholder Maize Productivity in Malawi: Toward an African Green Revolution. PLOS Biol 7(1):e1000023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobermann A, Cassman KG (2004) Environmental dimensions of fertilizer nitrogen: what can be done to increase nitrogen use efficiency and ensure global food security? In: Mosier AR, Syers JK, Freney JR (eds) Agriculture and the nitrogen cycle: Assessing the impacts of fertilizer use on food production and the environment. Island Press, Washignton DC, USA, pp 261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1991) World Soil Resources: An Explanatory Note on the FAO World Soil Resources Map at 1:25, 000, 000 Scale. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Chivenge P, Six J (2008) Interactive effects from combining fertilizer and organic residue inputs on nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2375–2384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisey P W, Mwangi W (1996) Fertilizer use and maize production in sub-Saharan Africa. CIMMYT economic working paper 96-01. Mexico, DF, CIMMYT

  • Hungate BA, van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Jastrow JD, Luo Y, de Graaff MA, van Kessel C, Osenberg CW (2009) Assessing the effect of elevated carbon dioxide on soil carbon: a comparison of four meta-analyses. Global Change Biol 15:2020–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen BH, Guiking FCT, van der Eijk D, Smaling EMA, Wolf J, van Reuler H (1990) A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils (QUEFTS). Geoderma 46:299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Fox RH, Rayner JH (1985) Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen – the so-called ‘priming’ effect. J Soil Sc 36:425–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GV, Raun WR (2003) Nitrogen response index as a guide to fertilizer management. J Plant Nutr 26:249–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kihara J, Vanlauwe B, Waswa B, Kimetu JM, Chianu J, Bationo A (2010) Strategic phosphorus application in legume-cereal rotations increases land productivity and profitability in western Kenya. Exp Agric 46:35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: Retrospects and prospects. Adv Agr 87:85–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Gachengo CN, Delve RJ, Cadisch G, Giller KE (2001) Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piha MI (1993) Optimizing fertilizer use and practical rainfall capture in a semi-arid environment with variable rainfall. Exp Agric 29:405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pixley K, Banziger M (2001) Open-pollinated maize varieties: A backward step or valuable option for farmers? Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 11–15th February 2001, pp. 22–28

  • Roberts TL (2008) Improving Nutrient Use Efficiency. Turk J Agric For 32:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1992. The MIXED procedure. SAS Technical Report P-229: SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA

  • Sileshi G, Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC, Place F (2008) Meta-analysis of maize yield response to woody and herbaceous legumes in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Soil 307:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Leffelaar PA, Shepherd KD, Giller KE (2005) Exploring diversity in soil fertility management of smallholder farms in western Kenya. II. Within farm variability in resource allocation, nutrient flows and soil fertility status. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:166–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, de Ridder N, Giller KE (2007) Heterogeneity of crop productivity and resource use efficiency within smallholder African farms: soil fertility gradients or management intensity gradients? Agr Syst 94:376–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Corbeels M, Giller KE (2008) Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya. Plant Soil 313:19–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uribelarrea M, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Below FE (2009) Phsiological N response of field-grown maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) with divergent yield potential and grain protein concentration. Plant Soil 316:151–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Wendt J, Diels J (2001a) Combined application of organic matter and fertilizer. In: Tian G, Ishida F, Keatinge JDH (eds) Sustaining Soil Fertility in West-Africa, SSSA Special Publication Number 58. Madison, USA, pp 247–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Aihou K, Aman S, Iwuafor ENO, Tossah BK, Diels J, Sanginga N, Merckx R, Deckers S (2001b) Maize yield as affected by organic inputs and urea in the West-African moist savanna. Agron J 93:1191–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Palm CA, Murwira HK, Merckx R (2002a) Organic resource management in sub-Saharan Africa: validation of a residue quality-driven decision support system. Agronomie 22:839–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Diels J, Aihou K, Iwuafor ENO, Lyasse O, Sanginga N, Merckx R (2002b) Direct interactions between N fertilizer and organic matter: evidence from trials with 15 N labelled fertilizer. In: Vanlauwe B, Diels J, Sanginga N, Merckx R (eds) Integrated Plant Nutrient Management in sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to Practice. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Tittonell P, Mukalama J (2006) Within-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertilizer application in western Kenya. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76:171–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Bationo A, Chianu J, Giller KE, Merckx R, Mokwunye U, Ohiokpehai O, Pypers P, Tabo R, Shepherd K, Smaling E, Woomer PL, Sanginga N (2010) Integrated soil fertility management: Operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outl on Agric 39:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MB, Knausenberger WJ (1997) Inorganic fertilizer use in Africa: Environmental and Economic dimensions

  • Zingore S, Murwira HK, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2007) Soil type, management history and current resource allocation: Three dimensions regulating variability in crop productivity on African smallholder farms. Field Crops Res 101:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for supporting various workshops and discussion sessions during which the main ideas presented in this paper were developed. The Belgian Directorate General for Development Cooperation (DGDC) is also acknowledged for supporting scientific staff time in the context of the project on ‘Improving agriculture-based livelihoods in Central Africa through sustainably increased system productivity to enhance income, nutrition security, and the environment – CIALCA-II’. J. Six and P. Chivenge acknowledge the support by a grant from the US National Science Foundation (DEB: 0344971).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Vanlauwe.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers.

Annex 1

Annex 1

Papers included in this study. Themes addressed are: (1) local, farmer-lead fertilizer management, (2) good, researcher-lead fertilizer mgt, (3) improved varieties, (4) fertilizer + organic inputs, and (5) within-farm soil fertility gradients.

Authors

Source

Country

Data points

Themes

Abdulahi et al. 2006

Karsetsart J (nat sci) 40:604–615

Ethiopia

12

2

Akinnifesi et al. 2007

Plant Soil 294: 203–207

Malawi

48

4

Akintoye et al. 1999

Field Crops Res 60: 189–199

Nigeria

18

2

Akulumuka et al. 1996

CIMMYT 5th Maize Conf

Tanzania

2

2

Azeez et al. 2006

Soil Tillage Res 91: 181–185

Nigeria

11

3

Bado et al. 2004

Bationo A (ed) 2004 p77–88

Burkina Faso

26

2

Barron and Okwach 2005

Agric Water Manage 74: 1–21

Kenya

16

3

Chikowo et al. 2003b

PhD Thesis

Zimbabwe

2

4

Chikowo et al. 2004

Plant Soil 262: 303–315

Zimbabwe

6

4

Chikoye et al. 2008

Weed Science 56: 424–433

Nigeria

36

3

Chilimba et al. 2004

CIMMYT Working Paper No. 11

Malawi

22

4

Chivenge et al. 2009

Agron J. 101: 1266–1275

Kenya

110

4

Delve 2004

Bationo A (ed) 2004 p127–136

Uganda

3

4

Dimes et al. 2001

Friesen D.K. and Palmer, A.F.E. (eds). 2001. p 452–456

Malawi, Zimbabwe

8

2

Elisaba et al. 2000

African Crop Sci J 8: 403–410

Ethiopia

27

4

FERTIBASE

FAO 2009 (www.fao.org)

sub-Saharan Africa

217

2

Fofana et al. 2005

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71: 227–237

Togo

96

4

Franke et al. 2008

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 82:117–135

Nigeria

81

2, 4

Gigou et al. 2002

Vanlauwe et al.(eds) 2002. p 199–208

Cote d’Ivoire

78

4

Gikonyo and Smithson 2004

Bationo A (ed). 2004 p137–150

Kenya

3

4

Gladwin et al. 2001

Food Policy 26:177–207

Malawi

4

1

Goma 2003

Soil Fert. Mgt Africa, CIAT, p187–281

Zambia

2

2

Horst et al. 1994

Plant Soil 160: 171–183

Ghana

2

2

Ikerra et al. 1998

CIMMYT 6th Maize Conf Proc

Malawi

4

2

Iwuafor et al. 2002

Vanlauwe et al.(eds). 2002. p 185–198

Nigeria, Benin

8

4

Jeramanya et al. 2007

African J Biotechn 6 (13): 1503–1508

Zimbabwe

6

2

Kaizzi et al. 2006

Agr Syst 88: 44–60

Uganda

16

5

Kamara et al. 2002

Tropentag 2002

Nigeria

22

3

Kayode and Agboola 1981

Fert Res 2:177–191

Nigeria

24

2

Kihanda et al. 1998

CIMMYT 6th Maize Conf Proc, 250–252

Kenya

4

4

Kihara et al. 2010

Exp agric 46:1–18

Kenya

24

2

Kim et al. 2007

Trop Sci 47 (4): 149–158

Nigeria

24

3

Kimani and Lekasi 2004

Bationo A (ed) 2004 p187–197

Kenya

6

4

Kimani et al. 2007

Bationo et al. (eds) 2007. p353–358

Kenya

14

4

Kimaro et al. 2009

Agric Ecosyst Environ 134: 115–125

Tanzania

16

4

Kimetu et al. 2004

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 68: 127–135

Kenya

12

4

Kiwia et al. 2009

Agrofor Syst 76: 455–465

Kenya

2

2

Kumwenda et al. 1998

CIMMYT Soil Fert Mal & Zim

Malawi

16

4

Kwesiga et al. 1999

Agrofor Syst 47: 49–66

Zambia

5

2

Lungu and Dynoodt 2008

African J Food Agric Nutr Dev 8:63–76

Zambia

12

2

Kakumba et al. 2001

SADC/ICRAF 14th S Africa Proc

Malawi

8

4

Mapiki et al. 1993

Aria Agrir. Srunrl. Sect. B. Soil orid Plurir Sri. 1993: 43, 231–237

Zambia

3

2

Mariki et al. 1996

CIMMYT 5th Maize Conf

Tanzania

6

4

Minde et al. 2008

ReSAKSS Working Paper No. 13

Kenya, Zambia

10

1

Mochoge and Onwonga 1998

CIMMYT 6th Maize Conf Proc

Kenya

17

2

Mtambanengwe and Mapfumo 2006

Plant Soil 28: 173–191

Zimbabwe

4

2

Mtambanengwe et al. 2006

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76: 271–284

Zimbabwe

110

4

Mugendi et al. 1999

Agrofor Syst 46: 30–50

Kenya

3

4

Mugwe et al. 2007

Afr Crop Sci J 15(3):111–126

Kenya

47

4

Mugwe et al. 2009

Exp agric 45: 47–59

Kenya

4

2

Muhr et al. 2002

Field Crops Res 78: 197–209

Nigeria

4

2

Mumera and Below 1993

Crop sci 33: 758–763

Kenya

6

2

Murwira et al. 1998

CIMMYT Soil Fert Mal & Zim

Zimbabwe

48

4

Mugwira and Murwira, 1997

CIMMYT Soil Fert Net working paper no. 2, 18 pp

Zimbabwe

4

4

Mushayi, et al. 1999

CIMMYT 6th Maize Conf Proc

Zimbabwe

4

2

Nhamo 2002

MPhil thesis

Zimbabwe

81

4

Nyadzi et al. 2006

Agric Ecosyst Environ 116: 93–103

Tanzania

2

4

Nyamangara et al. 2003

African Crop Sci J 11: 289–300

Zimbabwe

12

4

Nyathi et al. 1995

African Crop Sci J. 3: 451–456

Zimbabwe

3

4

Nziguheba et al. 2004

Bationo A (ed) 2004 p329–345

Kenya

20

4

Nziguheba et al. 2009

Plant Soil 314:143–157

Benin, Nigeria

20

4

Oikeh et al. 1999

Field Crops Res 62: 1–13

Nigeria

2

2

Oikeh et al. 2007

African J Agric Res 2(3): 112–118

Nigeria

2

2

Ojiem 2006

PhD Thesis

Kenya

12

5

Okalebo et al. 1999

Afr Crop Sci J 7(4): 423–431

Kenya

27

4

Onyango et al 1998

CIMMYT 6th Maize Conf Proc

Kenya

25

4

Pandey et al. 2000

Agric Water Manage 46: 1–13

Niger

24

2

Phiri et al.1999

Agrofor Syst 47: 153–162, 1999

Malawi

3

2

Saka et al. 2007

Malawi J Agr Sci 3(1): 49–57

Malawi

3

2

Sakala et al. 2001

DARS Annual Proc

Malawi

2

2

Sakala et al. 2004

Bationo A (ed) 2004 p373–384

Malawi

28

2, 3

Sallah et al. 2009

J Appl Biosci 20: 1194–1202

Rwanda

6

2

Shiluli et al. 2003

Afr Crop Sci J 11(3): 181–187

Kenya

8

2

Sigunga et al. 2002

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 62: 263–275

Kenya

10

2

Snapp et al. 1998

Agric Ecosyst Environ 71: 185–200

Zimbabwe

2

4

Swift et al. 1994

Roth Long-term Exp Proc, CABI, 229–251

Kenya

29

4

Tabi et al. 2008

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80: 161–172

Nigeria

8

2

Tabu 2001

PhD Thesis

Kenya

12

5

Tabu et al. 2006

Agron J 5(2): 191–195

Kenya

18

5

Teklay et al. 2006

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 75:163–173

Ethiopia

5

4

Vanlauwe et al., 2001

Agron J 93:1191–1199

Cote D'Ivoire, Benin, Togo, Nigeria

16

2

Vanlauwe et al. 2005

Plant Soil 273: 337–354

Nigeria

40

4

Wiyo and Feyen 1999

Agric Water Manage 41: 21–39

Malawi

16

1

Woldetsadik et al. 2005a

Kasetsart J Nat Sci 39:1–11

Ethiopia

6

2

Woldetsadik et al. 2005b

Kasetsart J Nat Sci 39:338–349

Ethiopia

6

2

Wopereis et al. 2006

Field Crops Res 96: 355–362

Togo

12

5

Workayehu and Kena 1998

CIMMYT 6th Maize Conf Proc

Ethiopia

27

4

Yeboah et al. 2007

PhD Thesis

Ghana

33

4

Yusuf et al. 2009

Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 84: 129–139

Nigeria

6

2

Zingore et al. 2007

Field Crops Res 101: 296–305

Zimbabwe

56

5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanlauwe, B., Kihara, J., Chivenge, P. et al. Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management. Plant Soil 339, 35–50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0462-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0462-7

Keywords

Navigation