Photosynthetica 2016, 54(4):502-507 | DOI: 10.1007/s11099-016-0208-8

Cultivar variation in cotton photosynthetic performance under different temperature regimes

W. T. Pettigrew1,*
1 USDA-ARS Crop Production Systems Res. Unit, Stoneville, USA

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields are impacted by overall photosynthetic production. Factors that influence crop photosynthesis are the plants genetic makeup and the environmental conditions. This study investigated cultivar variation in photosynthesis in the field conditions under both ambient and higher temperature. Six diverse cotton cultivars were grown in the field at Stoneville, MS under both an ambient and a high temperature regime during the 2006-2008 growing seasons. Mid-season leaf net photosynthetic rates (P N) and dark-adapted chlorophyll fluorescence variable to maximal ratios (Fv/Fm) were determined on two leaves per plot. Temperature regimes did not have a significant effect on either P N or Fv/Fm. In 2006, however, there was a significant cultivar × temperature interaction for P N caused by PeeDee 3 having a lower P N under the high temperature regime. Other cultivars' P N were not affected by temperature. FM 800BR cultivar consistently had a higher P N across the years of the study. Despite demonstrating a higher leaf Fv/Fm, ST 5599BR exhibited a lower P N than the other cultivars. Although genetic variability was detected in photosynthesis and heat tolerance, the differences found were probably too small and inconsistent to be useful for a breeding program.

Additional key words: abiotic stress; gas exchange; maximum quantum yield; thermotolerance; water-use efficiency

Received: June 19, 2015; Accepted: February 4, 2016; Published: December 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pettigrew, W.T. (2016). Cultivar variation in cotton photosynthetic performance under different temperature regimes. Photosynthetica54(4), 502-507. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0208-8
Download citation

References

  1. Bednarz C.W., van Iersel M.W.: Temperature response of wholeplant CO2 exchange rates of four upland cotton cultivars differing in leaf shape and leaf pubescence.-Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 32: 2485-2501, 2001. Go to original source...
  2. Burke J.J., Mahan J.R., Hatfield J.L.: Crop-specific thermal kinetic windows in relation to wheat and cotton biomass production.-Agron. J. 80: 553-556, 1988. Go to original source...
  3. Burke J.J., Wanjura D.F.: Plant responses to temperature extremes.-In: Stewart J.M., Oosterhuis D.M., Heitholt J.J., Mauney J.R. (ed.): Physiology of Cotton. Pp. 123-128. Springer, New York 2009. Go to original source...
  4. Clement J.D., Constable G.A., Conaty W.C.: CO2 exchange rate in cotton does not explain negative associations between lint yield and fiber quality.-J. Cotton Sci. 17: 270-278, 2013.
  5. Cottee N.S., Tan D.K.Y., Bange M.P. et al.: Multi-level determination of heat tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under field conditions.-Crop Sci. 50: 2553-2564, 2010. Go to original source...
  6. Crafts-Brandner S.J., Law R.D.: Effect of heat stress on the inhibition and recovery of the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activation state.-Planta 212: 67-74, 2000. Go to original source...
  7. Crafts-Brandner S.J., Salvucci M.E.: Rubisco activase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2.-P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13430-13435, 2000. Go to original source...
  8. Crafts-Brandner S.J., Salvucci M.E.: Analyzing the impact of high temperature and CO2 on net photosynthesis: biochemical mechanisms, models and genomics.-Field Crop. Res. 90: 75-85, 2004. Go to original source...
  9. Feller U., Crafts-Brander S.J., Salvucci M.E.: Moderately high temperature inhibit ribulose-1,5-bisphospahte carboxylase/ oxygenase (Rubisco) activase-mediated activation of Rubisco.-Plant Physiol. 116: 539-546, 1998. Go to original source...
  10. Hall T.D., Chastain D.R., Horn P.J. et al.: Changes during leaf expansion of fPSII temperature optima in Gossypium hirsutum are associated with the degree of fatty acid lipid saturation.-J. Plant Physiol. 171: 411-420, 2014. Go to original source...
  11. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D.: SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, 1996.
  12. Lokhande S., Reddy K.R.: Quantifying temperature effects on cotton reproductive efficiency and fiber quality.-Agron. J. 106: 1275-1282, 2014. Go to original source...
  13. Oosterhuis D.M., Snider J.L.: High temperature stress on floral development and yield of cotton.-In: D.M. Oosterhuis (ed.): Stress Physiology in Cotton. Pp. 1-24. The Cotton Foundation, Memphis 2011.
  14. Perry S.W., Krieg D.A., Hutmacher R.B.: Photosynthetic rate control in cotton.-Plant Physiol. 73: 662-665, 1983. Go to original source...
  15. Pettigrew W.T.: The effect of higher temperatures on cotton lint yield production and fiber quality.-Crop Sci. 48: 278-285, 2008. Go to original source...
  16. Pettigrew W.T., Heitholt J.J., Vaughn K.C.: Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines.-Crop Sci. 33: 1295-1299, 1993. Go to original source...
  17. Pettigrew W.T., Meredith W.R.: Leaf gas exchange parameters among cotton genotypes.-Crop Sci. 34: 700-705, 1994. Go to original source...
  18. Pettigrew W.T., Meredith W.R.: Genotypic variation in physiological strategies for attaining cotton lint yield production.-J. Cotton Sci. 16: 179-189, 2012.
  19. Pettigrew W.T., Turley R.B.: Variation in photosynthetic components among photosynthetically diverse cotton genotypes.-Photosynth. Res. 56: 15-25, 1998. Go to original source...
  20. Quisenberry J.E., McDonald L.D., McMichael B.L.: Response of photosynthetic rates to genotypic differences in sink-to-source ratios in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).-Environ. Exp. Bot. 34: 245-252, 1994. Go to original source...
  21. Reddy K.R., Doma P.R., Mearns L.O. et al.: Simulating the impacts of climate change on cotton production in the Mississippi delta.-Clim. Res. 22: 271-281, 2002. Go to original source...
  22. Reddy V.R., Baker D.N., Hodges H.F.: Temperature effects on cotton canopy growth, photosynthesis and respiration.-Agron. J. 83: 699-704, 1991. Go to original source...
  23. Rosenthal W.D., Gerik T.J.: Radiation use efficiency among cotton cultivars.-Agron. J. 83: 655-658, 1991. Go to original source...
  24. Snider J.L., Chastain D.R., Collins G.D.: Field-grown cotton exhibits seasonal variation in photosynthetic heat tolerance without exposure to heat-stress or water-deficit conditions.-J. Agron. Crop Sci. 201: 312-320, 2015. Go to original source...
  25. Snider J.L., Oosterhuis D.M., Collins G.D. et al.: Fieldacclimated Gossypium hirsutum cultivars exhibit genotype and seasonal differences in photosystem II thermostability.-J. Plant Physiol. 170: 489-496, 2013. Go to original source...
  26. Snider J.L., Oosterhuis D.M., Kawakami E.M.: Genotypic differences in thermotolerance are dependent upon prestress capacity for antioxidant protection of the photosynthetic apparatus in Gossypium hirsutum.-Physiol. Plantarum 138: 268-277, 2010. Go to original source...
  27. Snider J.L., Oosterhuis D.M., Skulman B.W., Kawakami E.M.: Heat stress-induced limitations to reproductive success in Gossypium hirsutum.-Physiol. Plant. 137: 125-138, 2009. Go to original source...