Skip to main content
Log in

Response of saturated cohesionless soil subjected to irregular seismic excitations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Irregular stress waves generated during an earthquake induce irregular shear stresses in the soil, which affect the dynamic behaviour of soil significantly. Laboratory investigations on the response of soils during real earthquake scenario are very limited. This paper reports about the response of saturated sandy soils subjected to irregular cyclic stress histories using stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests. Tests were conducted at different relative densities (30–90%) and confining stresses (50–150 kPa) representing varying compactness of soil obtained from different confining depths. Cyclic loading was applied as per the three different earthquake motions considered having different peak ground accelerations (PGAs). The responses are presented in terms of stress–strain variations, excess pore-water pressure ratio and shear strain accumulation in the soil specimen. The results indicated that the accumulated shear strains and excess pore-water pressures get significantly affected by the increase in confining stress and simultaneous changes in the relative density. Further, the study emphasized that the strong motions scaled to the same PGA levels produce substantially differing soil responses due to the variation in the associated strong-motion parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D2487 (2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D5311 (2011) Test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil. Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang CY, Power MS, Tang YK, Mok CM (1989) Evidence of nonlinear soil response during a moderate earthquake. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference on soil mechanics found engineering, Rio de Janeiro, vol 3, pp 1–4

  • Dobry R, Ladd RS, Yokel FY, Chung RM, Powell D (1982) Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, p 138

  • Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: measurement and parameter effects. J Soil Mech Found 98(6):603–624

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2720 part-3 (1981) Methods of the tests for soils: part 3: determination of specific gravity-fine, medium and coarse grained soils. Bureau of Indian standard, New Delhi

  • IS: 2720 part-4 (1975) Methods of the tests for soils: part 4: grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian standard, New Delhi

  • IS: 2720 part-14 (1983) Methods of the tests for soils: part 14: determination of density index of cohesionless soils. Bureau of Indian standard, New Delhi

  • Ishibashi I, Zhang X (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay. Soils Found 33(1):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Yasuda S (1972) Soil liquefaction due to irregular excitation. Soils Found 12(4):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Yasuda S (1973) Soil liquefaction under random earthquake loading condition. In: Proceedings of 5th world conference earthquake engineering. ASCE, Rome, pp 329–338

  • Ishihara K, Yasuda S (1975) Sand liquefaction in hollow cylinder torsion under irregular excitation. Soils Found 15(1):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Troncoso J, Kawase Y, Takahashi Y (1980) Cyclic strength characteristics of tailings materials. Soils Found 20(4):127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear modulus of sands under torsional shear loading. Soils Found 18(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirar B, Maheshwari BK (2013) Effects of silt content on dynamic properties of Solani sand. In: Seventh international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, Chicago

  • Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Esashi Y (1982) Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range. Soils Found 22(4):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer S (1996) Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Dey A (2013) Parameters influencing dynamic soil properties: a review treatise. Nat Conf Rec Adv Civ Eng 3:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SS, Dey A, Krishna AM (2014a) Equivalent linear and nonlinear ground response analysis of two typical sites at Guwahati city. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference, Kakinada

  • Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Dey A (2014b) Nonlinear site-specific ground response analysis: case study of Amingaon, Guwahati. In: 15th symposium on earthquake engineering, IIT Roorke

  • Kumar SS, Dey A, Krishna AM (2015) Dynamic response of river bed sands using cyclic triaxial tests. In: Proceedings of 5th Indian young geotechnical engineers conference (5IYGEC): extended abstracts. Shweta Publications

  • Kumar SS, Krishna AM, Dey A (2017) Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 99:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd RS, Dobry R, Dutko P, Yokel FY, Chung RM (1989) Pore-water pressure build-up in clean sands because of cyclic straining. Geotech Test J ASTM 12(1):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawada S, Tsukamoto Y, Ishihara K (2006) Residual deformation characteristics of partially saturated sandy soils subjected to seismic excitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report no. EERC 70–10, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249–1273

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 92(6):105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Wong RT, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 112(11):1016–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simatupang M, Okamura M (2017) Liquefaction resistance of sand remediated with carbonate precipitation at different degrees of saturation during curing. Soils Found 57(4):619–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhai A, Kumar SS, Dey A (2016) Site-specific 1-D nonlinear effective stress GRA with pore water pressure dissipation. In: 6th International conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, August 1–6, 2016, IIT Roorkee Extension Centre, 20 Knowledge Park II, Greater Noida, India

  • Sitharam TG, Govindaraju L (2003) Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soils at large strain levels. In: Proceedings of workshop on current practices future trends earthquake geotechnical engineering, Bangalore, India, pp 53–60

  • Stokoe KH, Hwang SH, Lee JNK, Andrus RD (1995) Effects of various parameters on the stiffness and damping of soils at small to medium strains. In: Proceedings of international symposium on pre-failure deformation of geomaterials, Sapporo, Japan, pp 785–816

  • Suetomi I, Yoshida N (1998) Nonlinear behavior of surface deposit during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. Soils Found 38:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchida H (1970) Prediction and counter measure against the liquefaction in sand deposits. Seminar in the Port and Harbour Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, pp 1–33

  • Tsukamoto Y, Ishihara K, Sawada S (2004) Settlement of silty sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes. Soils Found 44(5):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1988) Cyclic triaxial strain-controlled testing of liquefiable sands. Adv Triaxial Test Soil Rock 977:448–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand-mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(3):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geo-environ Eng 127(10):817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arindam Dey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S.S., Dey, A. & Krishna, A.M. Response of saturated cohesionless soil subjected to irregular seismic excitations. Nat Hazards 93, 509–529 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3312-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3312-1

Keywords

Navigation