Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The impacting factors of vulnerability to natural hazards in China: an analysis based on structural equation model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vulnerability to natural hazard is one of the inner characteristics of social economic system, which is determined and impacted by various factors from almost all the aspects of the system. Although it is widely agreed that the economic development, the migration, and the equity of resource allocation are among the most important impacting factors in forming and developing of the vulnerability, their interrelationship is still unclear enough. The study in this paper employs the method of structural equation model to discover the interrelationship between different latent impacting factors, as well as their contributions to the vulnerability of the system to natural hazards. It is found that, among the factors relating social and economic development, the equity of income allocation is a key point. Also the impacts from industrialization are different for different development levels. The conclusions are expected to be helpful references for the decision consideration of the local development strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Kelly PM (1998) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Paper presented at the IPCC workshop on adaptation to climatic variability and change, San Jose, Costa Rica, 29 March-1 April

  • Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. vol technical report 7. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberini A, Chiabai A, Muehlenbachs L (2006) Using expert judgement to assess adaptive capacity to climate change: evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Glob Environ Change 16:123–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R, Singh B (1996) Landslide hazard and risk assessment mapping of mountainous terrains-a case study from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Engg Geol 43(4):237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S (1997) Natural environmental hazards and their management: a case study of Sagar Island, India. Singap J Trop Geogr 18(1):20–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayard B, Jolly C (2007) Environmental behavior structure and socio-economic conditions of hillside farmers: a multiple-group structural equation modeling approach. Ecol Econ 62:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagavan MR, Virgin I (2004) Generic aspects of institutional capacity development in developing countries. SEI working paper. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

  • Brenkert AL, Malone EL (2005) Modeling vulnerability and resilience to climate change: a case study of India and Indian states. Clim Change 72:57–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for climate change research working paper No. 38. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich

  • Chan NW (1997) Increasing flood risk in Malaysia: causes and solutions. Disaster Prev Manage 6(2):72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lin L-S (2010) Structural equation-based latent growth curve modeling of watershed attribute-regulated stream sensitivity to reduced acidic deposition. Ecol Model 221(17):2086–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou C-P, Bentler PM (2002) Model modification in structural equation modeling by imposing constraints. Comput Stat Data Anal 41(2):271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crighton EJ, Elliott SJ, Meer J, Small I, Upshur R (2003) Impacts of an environmental disaster on psychosocial health and well-being in Karakalpakstan. Soc Sci Med 56(3):551–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran PJ, Hussong AM (2002) Structural equation modeling of repeated measures data: latent curve analysis. In: Moskowitz DS, Hershberger SL (eds) Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: methods and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1995) The forgotten casualties: women, children, and environmental change. Glob Environ Change 5(3):181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE, Patwardhan A (2004) Assessing vulnerability for climate adaptation. In: Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E (eds) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Change 17:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Change 17(2):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyhri A, Klæboe R (2009) Road traffic noise, sensitivity, annoyance and self-reported health: a structural equation model exercise. Environ Int 35(1):91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler PJ (1988) A latent-variable model of quality determination. J Bus Econ Stat 6(1):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob TF (2003) Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp Res B 37(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert RD, Bell RD (1997) Visualization in the simulation and control of economic models. Comput Econ 10(2):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci D (2010) Structural equations modeling: fit indices, sample size and advanced topics. J Consum Psychol 20(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imamura F, To DV (1997) Flood and typhoon disasters in Vietnam in the half century since 1950. Nat Hazards 15:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu C, Klein RJT, Hinkel J, Kumar KSK, Klein R (2005) Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change. NeWater working paper potsdam institute for climate impact research, Potsdam

  • Joreskog KG, Goldberger AS (1972) Factor analysis by generalized least squares. Psychometrika 37:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog K, Sörbom D (2001) LISREL 8: user’s reference guide. Scientific Software International, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Turner BL II, Schiller AA, Hsieh W (2005) Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (eds) Social contours of risk, vol. II: risk analysis, corporations & the globalization of risk, vol Chapter 14. Earthscan, London, pp 245–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (1999) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise. Ambio 28:182–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (1998) Software review: software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. J Psychoedu Assess 16(4):343–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnakumar J, Ballon P (2008) Estimating basic capabilities: a structural equation model appplied to Bolivia. World Dev 36(6):992–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary N, Conde C, Kulkarni J, Nyong A, Pulhin J (2008) Climate change and vulnerability. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Garden P, Imamura M (2005) The politics of scales, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong Region. Ecol Soc [online] 10(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindskog E, Dow K, Axberg GN, Miller F, Hancock A (2005) When rapid changes in environmental, social and economic conditions converge: challenges to sustainable livelihoods in Dak Lak. Stockholm environment institute report. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schröter D (2006) The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mushtaque A, Chowdhury R, Bhuyia AU, Choudhury AY, Sen R (1993) The Bangladesh cyclone of 1991: why so many people died. Disasters 17(4):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1974) Introduction to statistics for psychology and education. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesch SC, Weiner B (2001) A meta-analytic review of coping with illness: do causal attributions matter? J Psychosom Res 50(4):205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schader M, Schmid F (1994) Fitting parametric lorenz curves to grouped income distributions—A critical note. Empir Econ 19(3):361–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang N-S, Chen X, Fu Y-Z (2009) Bayesian analysis of non-linear structural equation models with non-ignorable missing outcomes from reproductive dispersion models. J Multivar Anal 100(9):2031–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PM, Sultana P (1996) Distributional and social impacts of flood control in Bangladesh. Geogr J 162(1)

  • Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2007) The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: an empirical test. Glob Environ Change 17:218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Vera MA, Canas JA (2003) A lifeline vulnerability study in Barcelona, Spain reliability. Engg Syst Saf 80(2):205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1231335100

  • Ülengin F, Kabak Ö, Önsel S, Ülengin B, Aktas E (2010) A problem-structuring model for analyzing transportation-environment relationships. Eur J Oper Res 200:844–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez C, Cervellon P, Perez-Sales P, Vidales D, Gaborit M (2001) Positive emotions in earthquake survivors in El Salvador. Anxiety Disorder 19:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams NL, Shahar G, Riskind JH, Joiner JTE (2005) The looming maladaptive style predicts shared variance in anxiety disorder symptoms: further support for a cognitive model of vulnerability to anxiety. J Anxiety Disord 19(2):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou L–L, Wei Y-M (2009) Impact assessment using DEA of coastal hazards on social-economy in Southeast Asia. Nat Hazards 48:167–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou L–L, Wei Y-M (2010) Driving factors for social vulnerability to coastal hazards in Southeast Asia: results from the meta-analysis. Nat Hazards 54:901–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the grant Nos. 40971276, and the National Key Projects from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grants 2008BAC44B04), is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Le–Le Zou

Authors
  1. Le–Le Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Le–Le Zou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zou, L. The impacting factors of vulnerability to natural hazards in China: an analysis based on structural equation model. Nat Hazards 62, 57–70 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9976-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9976-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation