Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surgery in elderly patients with intracranial meningioma: neuropsychological functioning during a long term follow-up

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical treatment of elderly patients with meningioma is has proved to be safe, especially when patients are selected using dedicated surgical scores. These scores take into account tumor size, edema, location and patient’s co-morbidities. Neuropsychological functioning (NPF) of this kind of patients has been poorly studied in literature and it is not taken into account by these scores. Aim of our study was to describe the long-term outcome in terms of NPF of elderly patients undergoing surgery. Patients older than 70 years of age affected by intracranial meningioma and selected with the Clinical-Radiological Grading Score were included in our study. Neuropsychological testing was performed using a dedicated battery of tests before surgery, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical, neurological and radiological outcomes were studied as well. Forty-one patients with a median age of 74 years were included in this study. Preoperatively only 1/41 patients showed a normal NPF with all tests scoring normally. Four out of 39 patients showed a complete neuropsychological recovery after 3 months; while 10/37 patients had a complete recovery after 12 months. NPF showed a trend of progressive improvement after surgery. Our study is the first experience reported in literature describing a long term follow-up in elderly patients after surgery for intracranial meningioma. In our series, surgery determined an improvement of NPF over time; especially with a low complication rate related to the selection of patients obtained through the CRGS. Further studies need to be performed in order to understand how brain edema, tumor size, volume and tumor location affect NPF in both short and long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro-Oncology 14(Suppl 5):v1–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Whittle IR, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D (2004) Meningiomas. Lancet Lond Engl 363:1535–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16153-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rockhill J, Mrugala M, Chamberlain MC (2007) Intracranial meningiomas: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Neurosurg Focus 23:E1. https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC-07/10/E1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Louis D, Ohgaki H, Wiestler O et al (2007) The 2007 WHO Classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 114:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB (2010) Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 99:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0386-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Waagemans ML, van Nieuwenhuizen D, Dijkstra M et al (2011) Long-term impact of cognitive deficits and epilepsy on quality of life in patients with low-grade meningiomas. Neurosurgery 69:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212badb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caroli M, Locatelli M, Prada F et al (2005) Surgery for intracranial meningiomas in the elderly: a clinical-radiological grading system as a predictor of outcome. J Neurosurg 102:290–294. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen-Inbar O, Soustiel JF, Zaaroor M (2010) Meningiomas in the elderly, the surgical benefit and a new scoring system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0552-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sacko O, Sesay M, Roux F-E et al (2007) Intracranial meningioma surgery in the ninth decade of life. Neurosurgery 61:950–955. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303190.80049.7d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Andrea G, Roperto R, Caroli E et al (2005) Thirty-seven cases of intracranial meningiomas in the ninth decade of life: our experience and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 56:956–961. (Discussion 956–961)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Konglund A, Rogne SG, Lund-Johansen M et al (2013) Outcome following surgery for intracranial meningiomas in the aging. Acta Neurol Scand 127:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01692.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossman R, Mukherjee D, Chang DC et al (2011) Preoperative charlson comorbidity score predicts postoperative outcomes among older intracranial meningioma patients. World Neurosurg 75:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gousias K, Schramm J, Simon M (2016) The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management. J Neurosurg 125:551–560. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.9.JNS15754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meskal I, Gehring K, Rutten G-JM, Sitskoorn MM (2016) Cognitive functioning in meningioma patients: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 128:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2115-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tucha O, Smely C, Preier M, Lange KW (2000) Cognitive deficits before treatment among patients with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 47:324–333; (Discussion 333–334)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tucha O, Smely C, Preier M et al (2003) Preoperative and postoperative cognitive functioning in patients with frontal meningiomas. J Neurosurg 98:21–31. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tucha O, Smely C, Lange KW (2001) Effects of surgery on cognitive functioning of elderly patients with intracranial meningioma. Br J Neurosurg 15:184–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Nieuwenhuizen D, Ambachtsheer N, Heimans JJ et al (2013) Neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in patients with radiologically suspected meningiomas. J Neurooncol 113:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1132-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Cristofori A, Zarino B, Fanizzi C et al (2017) Analysis of factors influencing the access to concomitant chemo-radiotherapy in elderly patients with high grade gliomas: role of MMSE, age and tumor volume. J Neurooncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2537-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Habets EJJ, Kloet A, Walchenbach R et al (2014) Tumour and surgery effects on cognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2115-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meskal I, Gehring K, van der Linden SD et al (2015) Cognitive improvement in meningioma patients after surgery: clinical relevance of computerized testing. J Neurooncol 121:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1679-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lezak MD (1994) Domains of behavior from a neuropsychological perspective: the whole story. Neb Symp Motiv 41:23–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Capitani E (1997) Normative data and neuropsychological assessment. Common problems in clinical practice research. Neuropsychol Rehabil 7:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Capitani E, Laiacona M (1997) Composite neuropsychological batteries and demographic correction: standardization based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19:795–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lageman SK, Cerhan JH, Locke DEC et al (2010) Comparing neuropsychological tasks to optimize brief cognitive batteries for brain tumor clinical trials. J Neurooncol 96:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9960-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Renzi E, Faglioni P (1978) Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the token test. Cortex 14:41–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Catricalà E, Della Rosa PA, Ginex V et al (2013) An Italian battery for the assessment of semantic memory disorders. Neurol Sci 34:985–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1181-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Orsini A, Grossi D, Capitani E et al (1987) Verbal and spatial immediate memory span: normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children. Ital J Neurol Sci 8:539–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carlesimo GA, De Risi M, Monaco M et al (2014) Normative data for measuring performance change on parallel forms of a 15-word list recall test. Neurol Sci 35:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1573-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spinnler H (1987) Italian standardization and classification of Neuropsychological tests. The Italian Group on the Neuropsychological Study of Aging. Ital J Neurol Sci 8:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  31. Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F et al (2002) A short version of the Stroop test: normative data in an Italian population sample. Nuova Riv Neurol 12:111–115

    Google Scholar 

  32. Monaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA (2013) Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci 34:749–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Basso A, Capitani E, Laiacona M (1987) Raven’s coloured progressive matrices: normative values on 305 adult normal controls. Funct Neurol 2:189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E et al (1986) Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale. Taratura su soggetti normali. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr 47:477–506

    Google Scholar 

  35. Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F et al (2002) Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 22:443–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100720200003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Casarotti A, Papagno C, Zarino B (2014) Modified Taylor complex figure: normative data from 290 adults. J Neuropsychol 8:186–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P (1980) Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol 37:6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 20:22–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cornu P, Chatellier G, Dagreou F et al (1990) Intracranial meningiomas in elderly patients. Postoperative morbidity and mortality. Factors predictive of outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 102:98–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schul DB, Wolf S, Krammer MJ et al (2012) Meningioma surgery in the elderly: outcome and validation of 2 proposed grading score systems. Neurosurgery 70:555–565. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318233a99a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen-Inbar O, Sviri GE, Soustiel JF, Zaaroor M (2011) The geriatric scoring system (GSS) in meningioma patients—validation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sacko O, Sesay M, Roux F-E et al (2007) Intracranial meningioma surgery in the ninth decade of life. Neurosurgery 61:950–954. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303190.80049.7d. (Discussion 955).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Steinvorth S, Welzel G, Fuss M et al (2003) Neuropsychological outcome after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for base of skull meningiomas: a prospective 1-year follow-up. Radiother Oncol 69:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00204-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Division of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza, 35, 20122, Milan, Italy

      Andrea Di Cristofori, Barbara Zarino, Giulio Bertani, Marco Locatelli, Paolo Rampini, Giorgio Carrabba & Manuela Caroli

    2. Division of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria – Ospedale Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy

      Andrea Di Cristofori

    Authors
    1. Andrea Di Cristofori
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Barbara Zarino
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Giulio Bertani
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Marco Locatelli
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Paolo Rampini
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Giorgio Carrabba
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Manuela Caroli
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Andrea Di Cristofori.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Additional information

    Andrea Di Cristofori and Barbara Zarino have equally contributed to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

    Supplementary material 1 (PDF 708 KB)

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Di Cristofori, A., Zarino, B., Bertani, G. et al. Surgery in elderly patients with intracranial meningioma: neuropsychological functioning during a long term follow-up. J Neurooncol 137, 611–619 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2754-3

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2754-3

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation