Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study of β-catenin and BRAF alterations in adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas: mutation analysis with immunohistochemical correlation in 54 cases

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare benign epithelial tumors, with two histological variants, namely the adamantinomatous variant (ACP) and the rarer papillary variant (PCP). They are locally infiltrative and surgically challenging tumors with severe long term morbidity. CTNNB1 mutations with β-catenin immunopositivity and BRAFV600E mutations with anti-VE immunopositivity have been recently described in ACPs and PCPs respectively. We aimed to study BRAF and CTNNB1 gene mutations in CPs operated at our institute, and correlate it with clinicopathological parameters including histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for proteins VE-1 and β-catenin. A total of 54 CPs diagnosed over 3-year duration were included. IHC for β-catenin and VE-1 proteins, and Sanger sequencing for CTNNB1 (exon 3) and BRAF (exon 15) genes were performed. CTNNB1 mutations were identified in 63% (27/43) of ACPs while nuclear immunopositivity for β-catenin was observed in 79% (34/43) of them. Seven ACPs showed β-catenin immunopositivity in the absence of mutations. BRAFV600E (p.Val600Glu) mutations were observed in 57% of PCPs (4/7), while cytoplasmic immunopositivity for anti-VE1 antibody was observed only in 43% of PCPs (3/7), all of which also harboured BRAFV600E mutations. The mutations and IHC staining patterns of ACPs and PCPs were non-overlapping. Four cases with uncertain histological pattern could be subcategorised into specific variants only following mutation analysis/IHC. The identification of hallmark molecular signatures in the two CP variants holds promise for alternate improved treatment modalities, emphasizing the need for sub-categorization in routine histopathology reporting. IHC for β-catenin and targeted sequencing for BRAFV600E serve as useful adjuncts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buslei R, Rushing EJ, Giangaspero F, Paulus W, Burger PC, Santagat S (2016) Craniopharyngioma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, Revised 4th edn, IARC, Lyon, pp 324–328

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen M, Bartels U, Branson H, Kulkarni AV, Hamilton J (2013) Trends in treatment and outcomes of pediatric craniopharyngioma, 1975–2011. Neuro Oncol 15:767–774

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Merchant TE, Kiehna EN, Sanford RA, Mulhern RK, Thompson SJ, Wilson MW, Lustig RH, Kun LE (2002) Craniopharyngioma: the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital experience 1984–2001. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:533–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stripp DC, Maity A, Janss AJ, Belasco JB, Tochner ZA, Goldwein JW, Moshang T, Rorke LB, Phillips PC, Sutton LN, Shu HK (2004) Surgery with or without radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:714–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prabhu VC, Brown HG (2005) The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas. Childs Nerv Syst 21:622–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sekine S, Shibata T, Kokubu A, Morishita Y, Noguchi M, Nakanishi Y, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S (2002) Craniopharyngiomas of adamantinomatous type harbor beta-catenin gene mutations. Am J Pathol 161:1997–2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kato K, Nakatani Y, Kanno H, Inayama Y, Ijiri R, Nagahara N, Miyake T, Tanaka M, Ito Y, Aida N, Tachibana K, Sekido K, Tanaka Y (2004) Possible linkage between specific histological structures and aberrant reactivation of the Wnt pathway in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. J Pathol 203:814–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buslei R, Nolde M, Hofmann B, Meissner S, Eyupoglu IY, Siebzehnrübl F, Hahnen E, Kreutzer J, Fahlbusch R (2005) Common mutations of beta-catenin in adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas but not in other tumours originating from the sellar region. Acta Neuropathol 109:589–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oikonomou E, Barreto DC, Soares B, De Marco L, Buchfelder M, Adams EF (2005) Beta-catenin mutations in craniopharyngiomas and pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol 73:205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brastianos PK, Taylor-Weiner A, Manley PE, Jones RT, Dias-Santagata D, Thorner AR et al (2014) Exome sequencing identifies BRAF mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas. Nat Genet 46:161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Larkin SJ, Preda V, Karavitaki N, Grossman A, Ansorge O (2014) BRAF V600E mutations are characteristic for papillary craniopharyngioma and may coexist with CTNNB1-mutated adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Acta Neuropathol 127:927–929

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Preda V, Larkin SJ, Karavitaki N, Ansorge O, Grossman AB (2015) The Wnt signalling cascade and the adherens junction complex in craniopharyngioma tumorigenesis. Endocr Pathol 26:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ribas A, Flaherty KT (2011) BRAF targeted therapy changes the treatment paradigm in melanoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8:426–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Menzies AM, Long GV (2014) Systemic treatment for BRAF-mutant melanoma: where do we go next? Lancet Oncol 15:e371–e381 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman MA, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AK (2014) BRAF inhibitor therapy for melanoma, thyroid and colorectal cancers: development of resistance and future prospects. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 14:128–143 (Review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anastas JN, Moon RT (2013) WNT signalling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13:11–26 (Review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Capper D, Preusser M, Habel A, Sahm F, Ackermann U, Schindler G, Pusch S, Mechtersheimer G, Zentgraf H, von Deimling A (2011) Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody. Acta Neuropathol 122:11–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez-Barbera JP (2015) 60 Years of neuroendocrinology: biology of human craniopharyngioma: lessons from mouse models. J Endocrinol 226:T161–172 (Review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaston-Massuet C, Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Jayakody SA, Charolidi N, Kyeyune R, Vernay B, Jacques TS, Taketo MM, Le Tissier P, Dattani MT, Martinez-Barbera JP (2011) Increased Wingless (Wnt) signaling in pituitary progenitor/stem cells gives rise to pituitary tumors in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11482–11487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarubi JC, Bei H, Adams EF, Boson WL, Friedman E, Brandão K, Kalapothakis E, Miranda D, Valle FL, Sarquis MS, De Marco L (2001) Clonal composition of human adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas and somatic mutation analyses of the patched (PTCH), Gsalpha and Gi2alpha genes. Neurosci Lett 310:5–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Monzon FA, Ogino S, Hammond ME, Halling KC, Bloom KJ, Nikiforova MN (2009) The role of KRAS mutation testing in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:1600–1606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schweizer L, Capper D, Hölsken A, Fahlbusch R, Flitsch J, Buchfelder M, Herold-Mende C, von Deimling A, Buslei R (2015) BRAF V600E analysis for the differentiation of papillary craniopharyngiomas and Rathke’s cleft cysts. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 41:733–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jha P, Suri V, Singh G et al (2011) Characterization of molecular genetic alterations in GBMs highlights a distinctive molecular profile in young adults. Diagn Mol Pathol 20:225–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Crotty TB, Scheithauer BW, Young WF Jr, Davis DH, Shaw EG, Miller GM, Burger PC (1995) Papillary craniopharyngioma: a clinicopathological study of 48 cases. J Neurosurg 83:206–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiner HL, Wisoff JH, Rosenberg ME, Kupersmith MJ, Cohen H, Zagzag D, Shiminski-Maher T, Flamm ES, Epstein FJ, Miller DC (1994) Craniopharyngiomas: a clinicopathological analysis of factors predictive of recurrence and functional outcome. Neurosurgery 35:1001–1010 (discussion 1010–1011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Adamson TE, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Yaşargil MG (1990) Correlation of clinical and pathological features in surgically treated craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 73:12–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tavangar SM, Larijani B, Mahta A, Hosseini SM, Mehrazine M, Bandarian F (2004) Craniopharyngioma: a clinicopathological study of 141 cases. Endocr Pathol 15:339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dietrich S, Glimm H, Andrulis M, von Kalle C, Ho AD, Zenz T (2012) BRAF inhibition in refractory hairy-cell leukemia. N Engl J Med 366:2038–2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brastianos PK, Shankar GM, Gill CM, Taylor-Weiner A, Nayyar N, Panka DJ et al. (2015) Dramatic response of BRAF V600E mutant papillary craniopharyngioma to targeted therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv310

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors like to acknowledge Mrs Kiran & Mr Pankaj for helping in immunohistochemistry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehar Chand Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Prit Benny Malgulwar and Aruna Nambirajan are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malgulwar, P.B., Nambirajan, A., Pathak, P. et al. Study of β-catenin and BRAF alterations in adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas: mutation analysis with immunohistochemical correlation in 54 cases. J Neurooncol 133, 487–495 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2465-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2465-1

Keywords

Navigation