Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of high-grade meningioma by preoperative MRI assessment

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-grade (World Health Organization grades II and III) meningiomas grow aggressively and recur frequently, resulting in a poor prognosis. Assessment of tumor malignancy before treatment initiation is important. We attempted to determine predictive factors for high-grade meningioma on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before surgery. We reviewed 65 meningiomas (39 cases, benign; 26 cases, high-grade) and assessed four factors: (1) tumor–brain interface (TBI) on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), (2) capsular enhancement (CapE), i.e., the layer of the tumor–brain interface on gadolinium-enhanced T1WI (T1Gd), (3) heterogeneity on T1Gd, and (4) tumoral margin on T1Gd. All four factors were useful in distinguishing high-grade from benign meningiomas, according to univariate analysis. On multivariate regression analysis, unclear TBI and heterogeneous enhancement were independent predictive factors for high-grade meningioma. In meningiomas with an unclear TBI and heterogeneous enhancement, the probability of high-grade meningioma was 98%. Our data suggest that this combination of factors obtained from conventional sequences on MR imaging may be useful to predict high-grade meningioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bondy M, Ligon BL (1996) Epidemiology and etiology of intracranial meningiomas: a review. J Neurooncol 29:197–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuratsu J, Kochi M, Ushio Y (2000) Incidence and clinical features of asymptomatic meningiomas. J Neurosurg 92:766–770. doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry A, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, Budka H, Von Deimling A (2007) Meningiomas. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system, 4th edn. IARC, Lyon, pp 164–172

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pearson BE, Markert JM, Fisher WS, Guthrie BL, Fiveash JB, Palmer CA, Riley K (2008) Hitting a moving target: evolution of a treatment paradigm for atypical meningiomas amid changing diagnostic criteria. Neurosurg Focus 24:E3. doi:10.3171/FOC/2008/24/5/E3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willis J, Smith C, Ironside JW, Erridge S, Whittle IR, Everington D (2005) The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10-year retrospective audit. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 31:141–149. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00621.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakasu S, Nakasu Y, Nakajima M, Matsuda M, Handa J (1999) Preoperative identification of meningiomas that are highly likely to recur. J Neurosurg 90:455–462. doi:10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasuya H, Kubo O, Tanaka M, Amano K, Kato K, Hori T (2006) Clinical and radiological features related to the growth potential of meningioma. Neurosurg Rev 29:293–296 (discussion 296–297). doi:10.1007/s10143-006-0039-3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura M, Roser F, Michel J, Jacobs C, Samii M (2003) The natural history of incidental meningiomas. Neurosurgery 53:62–70 (discussion 70–61)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hashiba T, Hashimoto N, Maruno M, Izumoto S, Suzuki T, Kagawa N, Yoshimine T (2006) Scoring radiologic characteristics to predict proliferative potential in meningiomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 23:49–54. doi:10.1007/s10014-006-0199-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ildan F, Tuna M, Gocer AP, Boyar B, Bagdatoglu H, Sen O, Haciyakupoglu S, Burgut HR (1999) Correlation of the relationships of brain-tumor interfaces, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiographic findings to predict cleavage of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 91:384–390. doi:10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakasu S, Hirano A, Llena JF, Shimura T, Handa J (1989) Interface between the meningioma and the brain. Surg Neurol 32:206–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakasu S, Nakasu Y, Matsumura K, Matsuda M, Handa J (1990) Interface between the meningioma and the brain on magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Neurol 33:105–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeguchi T, Miki H, Shimizu T, Kikuchi K, Mochizuki T, Ohue S, Ohnishi T (2003) Evaluation of the tumor-brain interface of intracranial meningiomas on MR imaging including FLAIR images. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takeguchi T, Miki H, Shimizu T, Kikuchi K, Mochizuki T, Ohue S, Ohnishi T (2003) Prediction of tumor-brain adhesion in intracranial meningiomas by MR imaging and DSA. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayerbe J, Lobato RD, de la Cruz J, Alday R, Rivas JJ, Gomez PA, Cabrera A (1999) Risk factors predicting recurrence in patients operated on for intracranial meningioma. A multivariate analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:921–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ildan F, Erman T, Gocer AI, Tuna M, Bagdatoglu H, Cetinalp E, Burgut R (2007) Predicting the probability of meningioma recurrence in the preoperative and early postoperative period: a multivariate analysis in the midterm follow-up. Skull Base 17:157–171. doi:10.1055/s-2007-970554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S (1997) A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16:965–980. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<965:AID-SIM509>3.0.CO;2-O

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spagnoli MV, Goldberg HI, Grossman RI, Bilaniuk LT, Gomori JM, Hackney DB, Zimmerman RA (1986) Intracranial meningiomas: high-field MR imaging. Radiology 161:369–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakasu S, Nakajima M, Matsumura K, Nakasu Y, Handa J (1995) Meningioma: proliferating potential and clinicoradiological features. Neurosurgery 37:1049–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshida K, Onozuka S, Kawase T, Ikeda E (2000) Lateral ventricular meningioma encapsulated by the dura-like membrane. Neuropathology 20:56–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dietemann JL, Heldt N, Burguet JL, Medjek L, Maitrot D, Wackenheim A (1982) CT findings in malignant meningiomas. Neuroradiology 23:207–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Durand A, Labrousse F, Jouvet A, Bauchet L, Kalamarides M, Menei P, Deruty R, Moreau JJ, Fevre-Montange M, Guyotat J (2009) WHO grade II and III meningiomas: a study of prognostic factors. J Neurooncol 95:367–375. doi:10.1007/s11060-009-9934-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vassilouthis J, Ambrose J (1979) Computerized tomography scanning appearances of intracranial meningiomas. An attempt to predict the histological features. J Neurosurg 50:320–327. doi:10.3171/jns.1979.50.3.0320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Buhl R, Nabavi A, Wolff S, Hugo HH, Alfke K, Jansen O, Mehdorn HM (2007) MR spectroscopy in patients with intracranial meningiomas. Neurol Res 29:43–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Toh CH, Castillo M, Wong AM, Wei KC, Wong HF, Ng SH, Wan YL (2008) Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1630–1635. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yue Q, Isobe T, Shibata Y, Anno I, Kawamura H, Yamamoto Y, Takano S, Matsumura A (2008) New observations concerning the interpretation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy of meningioma. Eur Radiol 18:2901–2911. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1079-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsutoshi Nakada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawahara, Y., Nakada, M., Hayashi, Y. et al. Prediction of high-grade meningioma by preoperative MRI assessment. J Neurooncol 108, 147–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0809-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0809-4

Keywords

Navigation