Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Water, Oils and Emulsifiable Adjuvant Oils as Formulating Agents for Metarhizium Anisopliae for Use in Control of Boophilus Microplus

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies were conducted to identify oil-based formulating agents (paraffinic oil, palm oil and emulsifiable adjuvant oils (EAOs)) for Metarhizium anisopliae that were superior to water with simple surfactants using a germination test and a bioassay against Boophilus microplus. Germination of conidia in all formulations, except 10% coconut EAO, produced more than 68% germination at 24 h and nearly 100% at 48 h. Coconut oil (average survival time (AST)=4.6±0.28 days) and 10% liquid paraffin EAO (AST=4.4±0.15 days) enhanced the pathogenicity of M. anisopliae to B. microplus relative to water (AST=8.4±0.42 days). M. anisopliae in 10% liquid paraffin EAO was the most effective formulation having a moderately high germination after 24 h and a low AST as well as a high AST in the control. In the second experiment, germination of conidia in 2% liquid paraffin EAO and 2% Cropspray was higher than in 2% Codacide oil at 24 h, however, all treatments reached 100% germination after 48 h. The ASTs of the EAO based M. anisopliae formulations (Average AST=6.4±0.54 days) were similar but lower that the ASTs of the controls (Average AST=9.6±0.28 days).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. VREP Bittencourt CL Massard AF Lima Particlede (1994) ArticleTitleActo do fungoMetarhizium anisopliae sobre a fase não parasitaria do ciclo biologico de Boophilus microplus Revista Universidade Rural, Série Ciência da Vida 16 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  2. APG Frazzon IDV Junior A Masuda A Shrank MH Vainstein (2000) ArticleTitleIn vitro assessment of Metarhizium anisopliae isolates to control the cattle tick Boophilus microplus Vet Parasitol 94 117–125 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00368-X Occurrence Handle11078949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G Gindin M Samish E Alekseev I Glazer (2001) ArticleTitleThe susceptibility of Boophilus annulatus (Ixodidae) ticks to entomopathogenic fungi Biocontrol Sci Technol 11 111–118 Occurrence Handle10.1080/09583150020029790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ACB Correia AC Fiorin AC Monteiro CJ Veríssimo (1998) ArticleTitleEffects of Metarhizium anisopliae on the tick Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in stabled cattle J Invert Pathol 71 189–191 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jipa.1997.4719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ABA Castro Particlede VREP Bittencourt E Daemon EDC Viegas (1997) ArticleTitleEficácia do fungo Metarhizium anisopliae sobre o carrapato Boophilus microplus em teste de estábulo Revista Universidade Rural, Série Ciência da Vida 19 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  6. HD Burges (1998) Formulation of Mycoinsecticides HD Burges (Eds) Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides: Beneficial Microorganisms, Nematodes and Seed Treatments Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 131–185

    Google Scholar 

  7. F Agudelo LA Falcon (1983) ArticleTitleMass production, infectivity, and field application studies with the entomopathogenic fungus Paecilomyces farinosus J Invert Pathol 42 124–132 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-2011(83)90210-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. RP Bateman (1997) ArticleTitleThe development of a mycoinsecticide for the control of locust and grasshoppers Outlook Agric 26 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  9. NE Jenkins MB Thomas (1996) ArticleTitleEffect of formulation and application method on the efficacy of aerial and submerged conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride for locust and grasshopper control Pestic Sci 46 299–306 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199604)46:4<299::AID-PS362>3.3.CO;2-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C Prior P Jollands G Patourel ParticleLe (1988) ArticleTitleInfectivity of oil and water formulations of Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) to cocoa weevil pest Pantorhytes plutus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) J Invert Pathol 52 66–72 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-2011(88)90103-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. RP Bateman M Carey D Moore C Prior (1993) ArticleTitleThe enhanced infectivity of Metarhizium flavoviride in oil formulations to desert locust at low humidities Ann Appl Biol 122 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  12. C Prior M Carey YJ Abraham D Moore RP Bateman (1995) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a bioassay method for the selection of entomopathogenic fungi virulent to the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forkål) J Appl Entomol 119 567–573

    Google Scholar 

  13. RP Bateman (1997) ArticleTitleMethod of application of microbiological pesticide formulations for the control of grasshoppers and locust Mem Entomol Soc Can 171 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  14. SP Wraight MA Jackson SL Kock Particlede (2001) Production, stabilization and formulation of fungal biocontrol agents TM Butt CW Jackson N Magan (Eds) Fungi as Biological Control Agents CAB International Wallingford 253–287

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alves RT. Development of mycoinsecticide formulations and application techniques appropriate for pest control [Dissertation] University of London, London, 1999: 225 pp.

  16. NE Jenkins G Heviefo J Langewald AJ Cherry CJ Lomer (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of mass production technology for aerial conidia for use as mycopesticides Biocontrol News Inform 19 21N–31N

    Google Scholar 

  17. S Blanford MB Thomas (1999) ArticleTitleHost thermal biology: the key to understanding host-pathogen interactions and microbial pest control? Agric For Entomol 1 195–202 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1461-9563.1999.00027.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D Moore J Langewald F Obognon (1997) ArticleTitleEffects of rehydration on the conidial viability of Metarhizium flavoviride mycopesticide formulations Biocontrol Sci Technol 7 87–94 Occurrence Handle10.1080/09583159731072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. RT Alves RP Bateman J Gunn C Prior SR Leather (2002) ArticleTitleEffect of different formulations on viability and medium term storage of Metarhizium anisopliae conidia Neotrop Entomol 31 91–99 Occurrence Handle10.1590/S1519-566X2002000100013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D Moore RP Bateman M Carey C Prior (1993) ArticleTitleUltra-violet radiation damage to Metarhizium flavoviride conidia and the protection given by vegetable and mineral oils and chemical sunscreens Ann Appl Biol 122 605–616

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norusis MJ, SPSS® Inc. SPSS® for Windows Advanced Statistics Release 6.0. SPSS® Inc. Chicago 1993.

  22. S Barnes D Moore (1997) ArticleTitleThe effect of fatty, organic or phenolic acids on the germination of conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride Mycol Res 10 662–666 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0953756296003152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. USDA. USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 11, No 04047 (September 1996), 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perry Polar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polar, P., Kairo, M.T., Moore, D. et al. Comparison of Water, Oils and Emulsifiable Adjuvant Oils as Formulating Agents for Metarhizium Anisopliae for Use in Control of Boophilus Microplus. Mycopathologia 160, 151–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-005-0120-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-005-0120-4

Keywords

Navigation