Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Afghanistan is located at the collision boundary of the Indian, Eurasian and Arabian plates and, therefore, lies in a seismically active region. Few probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) studies have been carried out for Afghanistan, which present only peak ground acceleration (PGA) values. This study presents PGA and spectral acceleration (SA) values for 0.2 and 1.0 s for return periods of 475, 975 and 2475 years. The study adopts the Cornell (Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606, 1968), McGuire (1976) approach for the PSHA and is based on an updated and homogenized earthquake catalogue consisting of 29,097 events greater than magnitude 4.0. Two declustering models, two seismic source models and four ground-motion prediction equations for shallow and deep earthquakes are used in this study. The PSHA results are combined using a logic tree approach with a total of 16 branches. The PGA and SA values for the different provinces of Afghanistan are obtained. The results are also shown as contour maps. The PGA values range from 0.06 to 0.66 g, 0.09 to 0.82 g and 0.13 to 1.10 g for return periods of 475, 975 and 2475 years, respectively. The PSHA yields higher PGA values for the Badakhshan, Kunduz Takhar and Kabul provinces, which lie in the northeastern part of country where active sources of the Hindukush and Pamir ranges are located. The hazard values obtained in this study are observed to be generally consistent with the study of Zhang et al. (Ann Geofis 42(6):1167–1190, 1999). In addition, a comparison of the current study with the hazard maps of the bordering countries generally shows consistent results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81(2):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Bilham R (2003) Earthquakes in Afghanistan. Seismol Res Lett 74(2):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West 2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1057–1085

  • Boyd OS, Mueller CS, Rukstales KS (2007) Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard map for Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2007-1137

  • Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Atik LA, Ancheta TD, Atkinson GM, Baker JW, Baltay A, Boore DM, Campbell KW, Chiou BSJ, Darragh R, Day S, Donahue J, Graves RW, Gregor N, Hanks T, Idriss IM, Kamai R, Kishida T, Kottke A, Mahin SA, Rezaeian S, Rowshandel B, Seyhan E, Shahi S, Shantz T, Silva W, Spudich P, Stewart JP, Watson-Lamprey J, Wooddell K, Youngs R (2014) NGA-West 2 research project. Earthquake Spectra 30(4):973–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Code of Pakistan (2007) Seismic provisions, Ministry of Housing, Govt of Pakistan

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Danciu L, Woessner J (2014) Pseudo probabilistic seismic hazard sources for Vrancea deep seismicity. Second European conference on earthquake engineering and engineering seismology, 2ECEES, 24–29 August, Turkey

  • Danciu L, Kale Ö, Akkar S (2016) The 2014 earthquake model of middle east region: ground motion model and uncertainties. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3497–3533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9989-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bul Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Gülen L. et al (2014) Earthquake model of the Middle East (EMME) project: active faults and seismic sources second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, 2ECEES, 24–29 August 2014, Istanbul, Turkey

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Ann Geofis 9:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • International Seismological Centre On-line bulletin (2017) International Seismological Centre, Thatcham. http://www.isc.ac.uk. Accessed 13 March 2017

  • Iyengar R, Chadha R, Balaji RK, Raghukanth S (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. The National Disaster Management Authority 86

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall

  • Lin P-S, Lee C-T (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:220–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1976) FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis. United States Geological Survey. Open file report, 76-6768.

  • Menon A, Lai CG, Macchi G (2004) Seismic hazard assessment of the historical site of Jam in Afghanistan and stability analysis of the minaret. J Earthq Eng 8(01):251–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M, Lai CG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard macrozonation of Tamil Nadu southern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(03):1320–1341

  • Moinfar AA, Naderzedeh A, Nabavi MH (2012) New Iranian seismic hazard zoning map for new edition of seismic code and its comparison neighboring countries. 15th World conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.

  • National Earthquake Information Center Online bulletin (2017). National Earthquake Information Center, Colorado. http://www.usgs.gov/earthquakes. Accessed 8 Nov 2018

  • Ordaz M, Martineli F, Aguilar A, Arboleda J, Meletti C, D’Amico V (2015) CRISIS 2015V3.2 program to calculate seismic hazard. Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittmeyer R, Jacob K (1979) Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, northwestern India, and southeastern Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69(3):773–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 90(B7):5479–5495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruleman CA, Crone AJ, Machette MN, Haller KM, Rukstales KS (2007) Map and database of probable and possible Quaternary faults in Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2007-1103, pp 1–39, 1 plate

  • Tinti S, Mulargia F (1985) Completeness analysis of a seismic catalog. Ann Geophys 03(03):407–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Waseem M, Lai CG, Spacone E (2018) Seismic hazard assessment of northern Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90(2):563–580

  • Weichert HD (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal periods for different magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(4):1337–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2017) October 2015 Hindu Kush earthquake. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=October_2015_Hindu_Kush_earthquake&oldid=803432029

  • Youngs RR, Chiou S-J, Silva W, Humphrey J (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Amini H, Yazdi P, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu MB, Kalafat D, Erdik M, Giardini D, Khan MA, Tsereteli N (2014) Recent developments of the Middle East catalog. J Seismol 18(4):749–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Yang ZX, Gupta HK, Bhatia SC, Shedlock KM (1999) Global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP) in continental Asia. Ann Geofis 42(6):1167–1190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The facilities provided by the National Centre of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar, to carry out this study and the numerical code provided by an EMME colleague are greatly acknowledged. The authors are also thankful to the reviewer of the manuscript for the constructive suggestions and comments that greatly helped improve the overall quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre of Excellence Geology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Muhammad Waseem, Sarfraz Khan & Waqas Ahmed

  2. Earthquake Engineering Centre, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Abdul Lateef

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Irshad Ahmad

Authors
  1. Muhammad Waseem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdul Lateef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irshad Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarfraz Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Waqas Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Waseem.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waseem, M., Lateef, A., Ahmad, I. et al. Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan. J Seismol 23, 217–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9802-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9802-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation