Abstract
In this study, cellulose fibers were removed from crop by-products using a combination of sodium hydroxide treatment followed by acidified sodium chlorite treatment. The objective was to obtain high recovery of cellulose by optimizing treatment conditions with sodium hydroxide (5–20%, 25–75 °C and 2–10 h) followed by acidified sodium chlorite (1.7%, 75 °C for 2–6 h) to remove maximum lignin and hemicellulose, as well as to investigate the effect of lignin content of the starting materials on the treatment efficiency. Samples were characterized for their chemical composition, crystallinity, thermal behavior and morphology to evaluate the effects of treatments on the fibers’ structure. The optimum sodium hydroxide treatment conditions for maximum cellulose recovery was at 15% NaOH concentration, 99 °C and 6 h. Subsequent acidified sodium chlorite treatment at 75 °C was found to be effective in removing both hemicellulose and lignin, resulting in higher recovery of cellulose in lupin hull (~ 95%) and canola straw (~ 93%). The resultant cellulose fibers of both crop by-products had increased crystallinity without changing cellulose I structure (~ 68–73%). Improved thermal stabilities were observed with increased onset of degradation temperatures up to 307–318 °C. Morphological investigations validated the effectiveness of treatments, revealing disrupted cell wall matrix and increased surface area due to the removal of non-cellulosics. The results suggest that the optimized combination of sodium hydroxide and acidified sodium chlorite treatments could be effectively used for the isolation of cellulose fibers from sweet blue lupin hull and canola straw, which find a great number of uses in a wide range of industrial applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Biomacromolecules 6:612–626
Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Biomacromolecules 10:162–165
Kadla JF, Gilbert RD (2000) Cell Chem Technol 34:197–216
Kumar V, Reus-Medina MDL, Yang D (2002) Int J Pharm 235:129–140
Madani A, Kiiskinen H, Olson JA, Martinez MD (2011) Nord Pulp Pap Res J 26:306–311
Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2015) Cellulose 23:1–31
Modenbach A (2013) Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Kentucky, pp 147–191
Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J (2007) Bioresour Technol 98:3000–3011
Pedersen M, Meyer AS (2009) Biotechnol Prog 25:399–408
Pan X, Xie D, Kang KY (2007) Appl Biochem Biotechnol 140:367–377
Ciftci D, Saldaña MDA (2015) Bioresour Technol 194:75–82
Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Gírio FM (2008) J Sci Ind Res 67:849–864
Kim JS, Lee YY, Kim TH (2016) Bioresour Technol 199:42–48
Kim TH, Lee YY (2007) Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137:81–92
Tajkarimi M, Riemann HP, Hajmeer MN, Gomez EL, Rzazvilar V, Cliver DO (2008) Int J Food Microbiol 122:23–28
Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY (2005) Bioresour Technol 96:1959–1966
Hubbell CA, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Bioresour Technol 101:7410–7415
Deshwal BR, Jo HD, Lee HK (2004) Can J Chem Eng 82(3):619–623
Yue Y, Han J, Han G, Zhang Q, French AD, Wu Q (2015) Carbohydr Polym 133:438–447
Ruangudomsakul W, Ruksakulpiwat C, Ruksakulpiwat Y (2015) Macromol Symp 354:170–176
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) NREL/TP-510-42618. National Renewable Laboratory, Golden
Segal L, Creely L, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) Text Res J 29:786–794
Bailey RW, Mills SE, Hove EL (1974) J Sci Food Agric 25:955–961
Pronyk C, Mazza G (2012) Bioresour Technol 106:117–124
Rambabua N, Panthapulakkalb S, Sain M, Dalai AK (2016) Ind Crop Prod 83:746–754
Lynd LR, Cushman JH, Nichols RJ, Wyman CE (1991) Science 251(4999):1318–1323
Sánchez C (2009) Biotechnol Adv 27:85–194
Grierer J (1986) Wood Sci Technol 20(1):1–33
Nishiyama Y (2009) J Wood Sci 55(4):241–249
Revol J, Dietrich A, Goring D (1987) Can J Chem 65:1724–1725
Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Bioresour Technol 99(6):1664–1671
Ray D, Sarkar BK, Basak RK, Rana AK (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 85:2594–2599
Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2011) Carbohydr Polym 86:1291–1299
Manfredi BL, Rodrigue ES, Wladyka PM, Vazquez A (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:255–261
Yang HP, Yan R, Chen HP, Zhen CG, Lee DH, Liang DT (2006) Energy Fuels 20:388–393
Brebu M, Vasile C (2010) Cell Chem Technol 44(9):353–363
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, #05356-2014) and the Food Processing Center of University of Nebraska-Lincoln for the financial support to carry out this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciftci, D., Flores, R.A. & Saldaña, M.D.A. Cellulose Fiber Isolation and Characterization from Sweet Blue Lupin Hull and Canola Straw. J Polym Environ 26, 2773–2781 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1164-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-1164-5