Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies for Engineering the Adhesive Microenvironment

  • Published:
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cells exist within a complex tissue microenvironment, which includes soluble factors, extracellular matrix molecules, and neighboring cells. In the breast, the adhesive microenvironment plays a crucial role in driving both normal mammary gland development as well tumor initiation and progression. Researchers are designing increasingly more complex ways to mimic the in vivo microenvironment in an in vitro setting, so that cells in culture may serve as model systems for tissue structures. Here, we explore the use of microfabrication technologies to engineer the adhesive microenvironment of cells in culture. These new tools permit the culture of cells on well-defined surface chemistries, patterning of cells into defined geometries either alone or in coculture scenarios, and measurement of forces associated with cell-ECM interactions. When applied to questions in mammary gland development and neoplasia, these new tools will enable a better understanding of how adhesive, structural, and mechanical cues regulate mammary epithelial biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bissell MJ, Rizki A, Mian IS. Tissue architecture: the ultimate regulator of breast epithelial function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003;15:753–62.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hennighausen L, Robinson GW. Signaling pathways in mammary gland development. Dev Cell 2001;1:467–75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schmeichel KL, Bissell MJ. Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. J Cell Sci 2003;116:2377–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whitesides GM. The ‘right’ size in nanobiotechnology. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:1161–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix—Cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001;2:793–805.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz BZ, Zamir E, Bershadsky A, Kam Z, Yamada KM, Geiger B. Physical state of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure and molecular composition of cell-matrix adhesions. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11:1047–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001;294:1708–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schmeichel KL, Weaver VM, Bissell MJ. Structural cues from the tissue microenvironment are essential determinants of the human mammary epithelial cell phenotype. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1998;3:201–13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barcellos-Hoff MH, Aggeler J, Ram TG, Bissell MJ. Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Development 1989;105:223–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aggeler J, Ward J, Blackie LM, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Streuli CH, Bissell MJ. Cytodifferentiation of mouse mammary epithelial cells cultured on a reconstituted basement membrane reveals striking similarities to development in vivo. J Cell Sci 1991;99(Pt 2):407–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Streuli CH, Bailey N, Bissell MJ. Control of mammary epithelial differentiation: basement membrane induces tissue-specific gene expression in the absence of cell–cell interaction and morphological polarity. J Cell Biol 1991;115:1383–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geiger B, Bershadsky A. Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001;13:584–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson CM, Chen CS. Cell–cell signaling by direct contact increases cell proliferation via a PI3K-dependent signal. FEBS Lett 2002;514:238–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herman B, Krishnan RV, Centonze VE. Microscopic analysis of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Methods Mol Biol 2004;261:351–70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berland KM. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: A new tool for quantification of molecular interactions. Methods Mol Biol 2004;261:383–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Drumheller P, Hubbell JA. The biomedical engineering handbook. Vol 2. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nakayama Y, Matsuda T, Irie M. A novel surface photo-graft polymerization method for fabricated devices. ASAIO J 1993;39:M542.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alcantar NA, Aydil ES, Israelachvili JN. Polyethylene glycol-coated biocompatible surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:343–51.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kane RS, Takayama S, Ostuni E, Ingber DE, Whitesides GM. Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. Biomaterials 1999;20:2363–76.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu VA, Jastromb WE, Bhatia SN. Engineering protein and cell adhesivity using PEO-terminated triblock polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:126–34.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prime KL, Whitesides GM. Self-assembled organic monolayers: Model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces. Science 1991;252:1164–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whitesides GM, Ostuni E, Takayama S, Jiang X, Ingber DE. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2001;3:335–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts C, Chen CS, Mrksich M, V. M, Ingber DE, Whitesides GM. Using mixed self-assembled monolayers presenting RGD and (EG)3OH groups to characterize long-term attachment of bovine capillary endothelial cells to surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:6548–55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Houseman BT, Mrksich M. The microenvironment of immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp peptides is an important determinant of cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2001;22:943–55.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bain CD, Troughton EB, Tao Y, Evall J, Whitesides GM, Nuzzo RG. Formation of monolayer films by the spontaneous assembly of organic thiols from solution onto gold. J Am Chem Soc 1989;111:321–35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Palegrosdemange C, Simon ES, Prime KL, Whitesides GM. Formation of Self-Assembled Monolayers by Chemisorption of Derivatives of Oligo(Ethylene Glycol) of Structure HS(CH2)11(OCH2CH2)nOH on Gold. J Am Chem Soc 1991;113:12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatia SN, Chen CS. Tissue engineering at the micro-scale. Biomed Microdev 1999;2:131–44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carter SB. Haptotaxis and the mechanism of cell motility. Nature 1967;213:256–60.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carter SB. Haptotactic islands: A method of confining single cells to study individual cell reactions and clone formation. Exp Cell Res 1967;48:189–93.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Letourneau PC. Cell-to-substratum adhesion and guidance of axonal elongation. Dev Biol 1975;44:92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Westermark B. Growth control in miniclones of human glial cells. Exp Cell Res 1978;111:295–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997;276:1425–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen CS, Alonso JL, Ostuni E, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;307:355–61.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee KB, Park SJ, Mirkin CA, Smith JC, Mrksich M. Protein nanoarrays generated by dip-pen nanolithography. Science 2002;295:1702–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson CM, Chen CS. VE-cadherin simultaneously stimulates and inhibits cell proliferation by altering cytoskeletal structure and tension. J Cell Sci 2003;116:3571–81.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar A, Biebuyck HA, Whitesides GM. Patterning self-assembled monolayers - applications in materials science. Langmuir 1994;10:1498–511.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Micropatterned surfaces for control of cell shape, position, and function. Biotechnol Prog 1998;14:356–63.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bernard A, Fitzli D, Sonderegger P, Delamarche E, Michel B, Bosshard HR, et al. Affinity capture of proteins from solution and their dissociation by contact printing. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:866–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bohner M, Ring TA, Rapoport N, Caldwell KD. Fibrinogen adsorption by PS latex particles coated with various amounts of a PEO/PPO/PEO triblock copolymer. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2002;13:733–46.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Amiji M, Park K. Prevention of protein adsorption and platelet adhesion on surfaces by PEO/PPO/PEO triblock copolymers. Biomaterials 1992;13:682–92.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tan JT, Tien J, Chen CS. Microcontact printing of proteins on mixed self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 2001;18:519–23.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tan JL, Liu W, Nelson CM, Raghavan S, Chen CS. Simple approach to micropattern cells on common culture substrates by tuning substrate wettability. Tissue Eng 2004;10:865–72.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chen CS, Brangwynne C, Ingber DE. Pictures in cell biology: Squaring up to the cell-shape debate. Trends Cell Biol 1999;9:283.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Roskelley CD, Srebrow A, Bissell MJ. A hierarchy of ECM-mediated signalling regulates tissue-specific gene expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995;7:736–47.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Howlett AR, Bailey N, Damsky C, Petersen OW, Bissell MJ. Cellular growth and survival are mediated by beta 1 integrins in normal human breast epithelium but not in breast carcinoma. J Cell Sci 1995;108 (Pt 5):1945–57.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Alford D, Taylor-Papadimitriou J. Cell adhesion molecules in the normal and cancerous mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1996;1:207–18.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Weaver VM, Fischer AH, Peterson OW, Bissell MJ. The importance of the microenvironment in breast cancer progression: Recapitulation of mammary tumorigenesis using a unique human mammary epithelial cell model and a three-dimensional culture assay. Biochem Cell Biol 1996;74:833–51.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hansen RK, Bissell MJ. Tissue architecture and breast cancer: The role of extracellular matrix and steroid hormones. Endocr Relat Cancer 2000;7:95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bhatia SN, Balis UJ, Yarmush ML, Toner M. Effect of cell-cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: Cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J 1999;13:1883–900.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bhatia SN, Yarmush ML, Toner M. Controlling cell interactions by micropatterning in co-cultures: Hepatocytes and 3T3 fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:189–99.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cunha GR. Role of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in normal and abnormal development of the mammary gland and prostate. Cancer 1994;74:1030–44.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Parmar H, Young P, Emerman JT, Neve RM, Dairkee S, Cunha GR. A novel method for growing human breast epithelium in vivo using mouse and human mammary fibroblasts. Endocrinology 2002;143:4886–96.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bissell MJ, Radisky D. Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer 2001;1:46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  54. St Croix B, Sheehan C, Rak JW, Florenes VA, Slingerland JM, Kerbel RS. E-Cadherin-dependent growth suppression is mediated by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(KIP1). J Cell Biol 1998;142:557–71.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol 1996;133:1403–15.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S, et al. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 2001;153:1175–86.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 1997;88:39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pelham RJ, Jr., Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:13661–5.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Beningo KA, Wang YL. Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. Trends Cell Biol 2002;12:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Burton K, Taylor DL. Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata. Nature 1997;385:450–4.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Harris AK, Wild P, Stopak D. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science 1980;208:177–9.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lee J, Leonard M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K. Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes. J Cell Biol 1994;127:1957–64.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dembo M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K. Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys J 1996;70:2008–22.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, Goichberg P, Tzur G, Sabanay I, et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:466–72.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schwarz US, Balaban NQ, Riveline D, Bershadsky A, Geiger B, Safran SA. Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: the effect of localized force and the need for regularization. Biophys J 2002;83:1380–94.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dembo M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K. Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys J 1996;70:2008–22.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schwarz US, Balaban NQ, Riveline D, Bershadsky A, Geiger B, Safran SA. Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: The effect of localized force and the need for regularization. Biophys J 2002;83:1380–94.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Galbraith CG, Sheetz MP. A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:9114–8.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tan JL, Tien J, Pirone DM, Gray DS, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:1484–9.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tien J, Nelson CM, Chen CS. Fabrication of aligned microstructures with a single elastomeric stamp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1758–62.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yeo WS, Yousaf MN, Mrksich M. Dynamic interfaces between cells and surfaces: electroactive substrates that sequentially release and attach cells. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:14994–5.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Yousaf MN, Houseman BT, Mrksich M. Using electroactive substrates to pattern the attachment of two different cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:5992–6.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Li Jeon N, Baskaran H, Dertinger SK, Whitesides GM, Van de Water L, Toner M. Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:826–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

    Dana M. Pirone & Christopher S. Chen

  2. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Dana M. Pirone & Christopher S. Chen

Authors
  1. Dana M. Pirone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher S. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher S. Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pirone, D.M., Chen, C.S. Strategies for Engineering the Adhesive Microenvironment. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9, 405–417 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-004-1410-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-004-1410-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation