Abstract
An ongoing discussion in the partner violence (PV) literature exists concerning the respective roles of perpetrator and victim. Most of it is gender based. The classical feminist argument is that women are victims of the violence and this is sustained by the social perception of them as victims. More recently increased recognition of mutual violence has taken place, calling into question the gender-based victim/perpetrator model. Recent research further calls into question this role differentiation through findings indicating that a majority of the protagonists in the PV drama view themselves as victims. A corollary to this controversy is that whether a man or a woman is the victim, the principal client in conventional intervention with PV is the woman. This paper will argue that the relevancy of gender-based role differentiation for most PV cases is not supported by recent data, and that incorporating an interactive perspective enables a more complex view than the classical victim/perpetrator one, and may improve our practice with PV populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombe, B. (2001). Not either/or but both/and: An academic/field partnership in practice. Australian Social Work, 54(4), 19–27.
Augusta-Scott, T., & Dankwort, J. (2002). Partner abuse group intervention: Lessons from education and narrative therapy approaches. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 783–805.
Bailey, B. (2014). Women’s violence toward their male partner: Perspectives from outside and from within. Doctoral dissertation: School of Socail Work, University of Haifa (in Hebrew).
Bates, E. A., Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2014). Testing predictions from the male control theory of men’s partner violence. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 42–55.
Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2005). Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 85–96.
Cook, P. W. (2009). Abused men: The hidden side of domestic violence. Westport: Praeger Publishing.
David, S. D., & Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint of manhood, and what it’s done for us lately. In S. D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. (pp.1–48). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (1990). Male peer support and woman abuse: The current state of knowledge. Sociological Focus, 23(2), 129–139.
Dobash, E. R., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
Douglas, E. M., & Hines, D. A. (2011). The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 473–485.
Dutton, D. G., & Corvo, K. (2007). The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 658–667.
Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4(2), 196–231.
Eisikovits, E. Winstok, Z. & Bailey, B. (2015). Social worker’s knowledge, attitudes, practices and dilemmas in the field of intimate partner violence: A National Study. University of Haifa & The Ministry of Social Welfare (in hebrew).
Hackett, S., McWhirter, P. T., & Lesher, S. (2016). The therapeutic efficacy of domestic violence victim interventions. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 123–132.
Hamby, S. (2005). The gender debate about intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 24–34.
Johnson, M. P., & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322–349.
Kar, H. L., & O’Leary, K. D. (2010). Gender symmetry or asymmetry in intimate partner victimization? Not an either/or answer. Partner Abuse, 1(2), 152–168.
Karakurt, G., Whiting, K., Esch, C., Bolen, S. D., & Calabrese, J. R. (2016). Couples therapy for intimate partner violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. doi:10.1111/jmft.12178.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. (2012). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199–232.
Miller, E., Breslau, J., Petukhova, M., Fayyad, J., Green, J. G., Kola, L., et al. (2011). Premarital mental disorders and physical violence in marriage: Cross-national study of married couples. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(4), 330–337.
Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9–25.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. London: Pluto Press.
Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(1), 65–98.
Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E., Amanor-Boadu, Y., & Smith, D. (2012). Systemic perspectives on intimate partner violence treatment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 220–240.
Straus, M. A. (2015). Dyadic concordance and discordance in family violence: A powerful and practical approach to research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 83–94.
Swan, S. C., Gambone, L. J., Caldwell, J. E., Sullivan, T. P., & Snow, D. L. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23(3), 301–315.
Winstok, Z., & Eisikovits, Z. (2008). Motives and control in escalatory conflicts in intimate relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 287–296.
Winstok, Z. & Straus, M. (2016). Bridging the two sides of a 30-year controversy over gender differences in perpetration of physical partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, this issue. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9896-x.
Winstok, Z., Eisikovits, Z., & Gelles, R. (2002). Structure and dynamics of escalation from the batterer’s perspective. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 83(2), 129–141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eisikovits, Z., Bailey, B. The Social Construction of Roles in Intimate Partner Violence: Is the Victim/Perpetrator Model the only Viable one?. J Fam Viol 31, 995–998 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9879-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9879-y