Skip to main content
Log in

Consistency and Accuracy of Batterer Typology Identification

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers in the field of domestic violence have derived “typologies” to better conceptualize the differences found among batterers (e.g., Holtzworth-Monroe and Stuart [1994]. Psychol. Bull. 116: 476–497). Efforts have since been made to evaluate clinicians' accuracy in classifying batterers into subtypes (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Huss, and Ramsey [2000]. J. Fam. Violence 15: 37–53). The present study investigated the accuracy and consistency with which experienced clinicians could sort profiles into an empirically derived MCMI-based batterer typology (Hamberger, Lohr, Bonge, and Tolin [1996] Violence Vict. 11: 277–292). Seven PhD level psychologists with experience in the field of domestic violence were asked to sort 36 MCMI profiles into three piles. Each pile was represented by each of the three prototypical cluster types described in Hamberger et al. (1996) using the Basic 8 MCMI subscales. Overall, expert raters were able to sort most profiles into the three clusters accurately. However, the expert raters had the most difficulty correctly sorting some of the “nonpathological” profiles, as 40% were placed into the antisocial cluster and (6%) were sorted into the negativistic-dependent cluster. There are a number of possible explanations for the lower accuracy in sorting the nonpathological cluster. Results suggest that psychologists with domestic violence training can accurately sort MCMI profiles of batterers into the main three subtypes derived from empirically-based typology research. Clinical implications for typology assessment are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beasley, R., and Stoltenberg, C. D. (1992). Personality characteristics of male spouse abusers. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 23: 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O. W., Fagan, R. W., Booker, J. M. (1991). Hostility and stress as mediators of aggression in violent men. J. Fam. Violence 14: 371–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choca, J. P., Peterson, C. A., and Shanley, L. A. (1986). Factor analysis of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 54: 253–255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choca, J. P., Shanley, L. A., and Van Denberg, E. (1992). Interpretive guide to the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Dutton, D. G. (1988). Profiling of wife assaulters: Preliminary evidence for a trimodal analysis. Violence Vict. 3: 5–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., and Painter, S. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence Vict. 8: 105–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 24: 1367–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else, L., Wonderlich, S. A., Beatty, W. W., Christie, D. W., and Staton, R. D. (1993). Personality characteristics of men who physically abuse women. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 44: 54–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flourney, P. S., and Wilson, G. L. (1991). Assessment of MMPI profiles of male batterers. Violence Vict. 6: 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1993). Alcohol and other drugs are associated with violence: They are not its cause. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.) Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 182–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibertini, M., and Retzlaff, P. D. (1988). Facotr invariance of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 10: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (1988). Who are these guys?: Toward a behavioral typology of batterers. Violence Vict. 3: 187–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, G., Duckworth, J., Zimostrad, S., and Nicholas, D. (1988). Abusive partners: MMPI profiles of batterers. J. Ment. Health Couns. 10: 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K. (1998). Clinical Utility of Batterer Typologies: A Promise Yet Unfulfilled. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy.

  • Hamberger, L. K. (2000). Requests for complete record release: A three-step response protocol. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train. 37: 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1986). Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: A cross-validation study. J. Fam. Violence 1: 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1989). Counseling male spouse abusers: Characteristics of treatment completers and dropouts. Violence Vict. 4: 275–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1991). Personality correlates of men who batter and nonviolent men: Some continuities and discontinuities. J. Fam. Violence 6: 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., and Tolin, D. F. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence Vict. 11: 277–292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., and Gottlieb, M. (2000). Predictors of treatment dropout from a spouse abuse abatement program. Behav. Modif. 24: 528–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Dutton, D. G., and Newlove, T. (1993). The prevalence of personality disorder among wife assaulters. J. Personal. Disord. 7: 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. M., and Smith, C. (1998). Batterer programs: What criminal justice agencies need to know. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.eurowrc.org/11.men_violent/men-program-en/04.men_program.htm.

  • Holtzworth-Monroe, A., and Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychol. Bull. 116: 476–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Monroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., and Stuart, G. L. (1999). A typology of male batterers: An initial examination. In Ariaga, X. B., and Oskamp, S. (eds.), Violence in intimate relationships, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Stuart, G. L., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., and Rehman, U. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 68: 1000–1019.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huss, M. T., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2000). Identification of the psychopathic batterer: The clinical, legal, and policy implications. Aggress. Violent Behav. 5: 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, J. E., Julian, T., and McKenry, P. C. (1997). Application of attachment theory to male violence toward female intimates. J. Fam. Violence 12: 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Huss, M. T., and Ramsey, S. (2000). The clinical utility of batterer typologies. J. Fam. Violence 15: 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayseless, P. (1991). Adult attachment patterns and courtship violence. Fam. Relat. Interdiscip. J. Appl. Fam. Stud. 40: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiuro, R. D., Cahn, T. S., and Vitaliano, P. (1988). Anger, hostility, and depression in domestically violent versus generally assaultive men and nonviolent control subjects. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 17–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monson, C. M., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2002). Sexual and nonsexual dating violence perpetration: Testing an integrated perpetrator typology. Violence Vict. 17: 403–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Project MATCH Research Group (1997). Matching alcohol treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J. Studies Alcohol 58: 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retzlaff, P. D., and Gibertini, M. (1987). Factor structure of the MCMI basic personality scales and common-item artifact. J. Pers. Assess. 51: 588–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: Interaction of abuser traits and treatment models. Violence Vict. 11: 393–414.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., and Gottman, J. M. (2000). Testing a typology of batterers. J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 68: 658–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. J., and Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Implications of personality profiles for batterer treatment. J. Interpers. Violence 15: 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Lohr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohr, J.M., Bonge, D., Witte, T.H. et al. Consistency and Accuracy of Batterer Typology Identification. J Fam Viol 20, 253–258 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-5989-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-5989-7

Keywords

Navigation