Skip to main content
Log in

Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass®

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that bioactive glasses possessed antibacterial effect on common bacteria due to the high aqueous pH value caused by the bioactive glass dissolution. In the present study, the efficiency of the antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass® (45S5 BAG) against S. aureus, S. epidermidis and E. coli and its mechanism were investigated. The results showed that 45S5 BAG exhibited a strong antibacterial effect against the bacteria, and the sensitivity of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria to Bioglass was different. Furthermore, a dose-dependent bacterial adhesion on 45S5 BAG particles and the formation of needle-like Bioglass debris were observed, which resulted in the damage of cell walls and inactivation of bacteria. The results suggested that both the high pH and bioglass debris on the surface of bacteria may be the possible mechanisms of the antibacterial effect of 45S5 BAG particulates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.L. Hench, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 17, 967 (2006). doi:10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Verrier, J.J. Blaker, V. Maquet, L.L. Hench, A.R. Boccaccini, Biomaterials 25, 3013 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S.P. Bendall, M. Gaies, C. Frondoza, R.H. Jinnah, D.S. Hungerford, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 41, 392 (1998). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<392::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Stoor, E. Soderling, J.I. Salonen, Acta Odontol. Scand. 56, 161 (1998). doi:10.1080/000163598422901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Yli-urpo, T. Narhi, E. Soderling, Acta Odontol. Scand. 61, 241 (2003). doi:10.1080/00016350310004719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Munukka, O. Lepparanta, M. Korkeamaki, M. Vaahtio, T. Peltola, D. Zhang et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19, 27 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3143-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Lepparanta, M. Vaahtio, T. Peltola, D. Zhang, L. Hupa, M. Hupa et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19, 547 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3018-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Allan, H. Newman, M. Wilson, Biomaterials 22, 1683 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Allan, H. Newman, M. Wilson, Clin. Oral Implants Res. 13, 53 (2002). doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130106.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Pratten, S.N. Nazhat, J.J. Blaker, A.R. Boccaccini, J. Biomater. Appl. 19, 47 (2004). doi:10.1177/0885328204043200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L.L. Hench, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1705 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. K.F. Chah, C.A. Eze, C.E. Emuelosi, C.O. Esimone, J. Ethnopharmacol. 104, 164 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Bellantone, N.J. Coleman, L.L. Hench, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51, 484 (2000). doi:10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<484::AID-JBM24>3.0.CO;2-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Popovic, M. Otter, G. Calzaferri, C.L. De, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 6188 (2007). doi:10.1002/anie.200701019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T.E. Davis, D.D. Fuller, J. Clin. Microbiol. 29, 2193 (1991)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Jacobs, F. Lafolie, J.M. Herry, M. Debroux, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 59, 35 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.04.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Ohmura, K. Kitamura, H. Saiki, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 4044 (1993)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Sabath, M. Finland, J. Bacteriol. 85, 314 (1963)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G.J. Miraglia, H.I. Basch, Appl. Microbiol. 15, 566 (1967)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Rundegren, T. Sjodin, L. Petersson, E. Hansson, I. Jonsson, Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 10, 102 (1995). doi:10.1111/j.1399-302X.1995.tb00127.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Hu, Y.H. Yan, Y.F. Wang, X.Y. Cao, S.P. Li, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 20, 35 (2005). Material science edition

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Hu, S.P. Li, Y.H. Yan, Y.F. Wang, X.Y. Cao, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 20, 13 (2005). Material science edition

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Zhang, M. Hupa, L. Hupa, Acta Biomater. 4(5), 1498 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (20060400679), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No.: 07DZ05012) and Project supported by Funds of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for Key Topics in Innovation Engineering (Grant No. KGCX2-YW-207). The authors would like to show appreciations to Mr. Wanyin Zhai, Mr. Weiming Gu and Mr. Kaili Lin for their kind discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, S., Chang, J., Liu, M. et al. Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass® . J Mater Sci: Mater Med 20, 281–286 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5

Keywords

Navigation