Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploration of photoreduction ability of reduced graphene oxide–cadmium sulphide hetero-nanostructures and their intensified activities against harmful microbes

  • Composites & nanocomposites
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Fabrication of effective photocatalyst using semiconductors and graphene or reduced graphene oxide has been regarded as one of the most promising task to attenuate the environmental pollution. This paper reports the synthesis of different nanocomposites of reduced graphene oxide–cadmium sulfide (RGO-CdS) with varying weight ratio of RGO by simple reflux condensation reaction, during which the reduction of graphene oxide (GO) and formation of CdS nanoparticles occur simultaneously. The combination of CdS nanoparticles (NPs) with the optimum amount of RGO gives a noticeable effect on the properties of the synthesized hybrid nanocomposites, such as enhanced optical, photocatalytic properties. The microscopic studies proved that with the increasing RGO content in the nanocomposites, the particle size decreases and got different shapes. These nanocomposites have been investigated separately as nanocatalyst for the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in the presence of visible light irradiation and the catalytic activity depends on the pH of the medium and also the particle size of the CdS NPs which are supported by the band gap energy derived from Tauc’s equation. The significant increase in photocatalytic performance of the RGO-CdS nanocomposite was attributed to high electron conductivity of the CdS NPs and RGO surface which facilitates charge separation and prolongs the lifetime of photogenerated electron–hole pairs by decreasing the recombination rate. Antibacterial and antiprotozoal activities have been investigated to determine the efficiency of these RGO-CdS nanocomposites on different bacterial and protozoan strains.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Scheme 2
Fig. 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from authors.

Change history

References

  1. Liu X, Yinliang L, Jun Y, Bo W, Mingguo M, Feng X, Runcang S, Xueming Z (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of CdS-decorated TiO2/carbon core-shell microspheres derived from microcrystalline cellulose. Materials 9:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferronato N, Torretta V (2019) Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:1060

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dinker MK, Kulkarni PS (2015) Recent advances in silica based material for removal of hexavalent chromium: a review. J Chem Eng Data 60:2521–2540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions for wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92:407–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Namasivayam C, Kadirvelu K (1999) Uptake of mercury (II) from wastewater by activated carbon from an unwanted agricultural solid by-product: coirpith. Carbon 37:79–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadmus P, Brinkman SF, May MK (2018) Chronic toxicity of ferric iron for north american aquatic organisms: derivation of a chronic water quality criterion using single species and mesocosm data. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 74:605–615

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Paulino AT, Minasse FAS, Guilherme MR, Reis AV, Muniz EC, Nozaki J (2006) Novel adsorbent based on silkworm chrysalides for removal of heavy metals from wastewaters. J Colloid Interface Sci 301:479–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Naseem R, Tahir SS (2001) Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous/acidic solutions by using bentonite as an adsorbent. Water Res 35:3982–3986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveira H (2012) Chromium as an environmental pollutant: insights on induced plant toxicity. J Bot 2012:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu W, Yang L, Xu S, Chen Y, Liu B, Li Z, Jiang C (2018) Efficient removal of hexavalent chromium from water by an adsorption–reduction mechanism with sandwiched nanocomposites. RSC Adv 8:15087–15093

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pakade VE, Tavengwa NT, Madikizela LM (2019) Recent advances in hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions by adsorptive methods. RSC Adv 9:26142–26164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu H, Zhang F, Peng Z (2019) Adsorption mechanism of Cr (VI) onto GO/PAMAMs composites. Sci Rep 9:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen JH, Xing HT, Guo HX, Weng W, Hu SR, Li SX, Huang YH, Sun X, Su ZB (2014) Investigation on the adsorption properties of Cr(VI) ions on a novel graphene oxide (GO) based composite adsorbent. J Mater Chem A 2:12561–12570

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maitlo HA, Kim KH, Kumar V, Kim S, Park JW (2019) Nanomaterials-based treatment options for chromium in aqueous environments. Environ Int 130:104748–104765

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao FX (2012) Self-assembly preparation of gold nanoparticles-TiO2 nanotube arrays binary hybrid nanocomposites for photocatalytic applications. J Mater Chem 22:7819–7830

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang J, Hou B, Wang J, Tian B, Bi J, Wang N, Li X, Huang X (2019) Nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomaterials 9:424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fato FP, Li DW, Zhao LJ, Qiu K, Long YT (2019) Simultaneous removal of multiple heavy metal ions from river water using ultrafine mesoporous magnetite nanoparticles. ACS Omega 4:7543–7549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moronshing M, Sah A, Kalyani V, Subramaniam C (2020) Nanostructured carbon florets as scavenger of As3+, Cr6+, Cd2+, and Hg2+ for water remediation. ACS Appl Nano Mater 3:468–478

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santhosh C, Nivetha R, Kollu P, Srivastava V, Sillanpää M, Grace AN, Bhatnagar A (2017) Removal of cationic and anionic heavy metals from water by 1D and 2D-carbon structures decorated with magnetic nanoparticles. Sci Rep 7:14107

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tantubay K, Das P, Sen MB (2020) Ternary reduced graphene oxide–CuO/ZnO nanocomposite as a recyclable catalyst with enhanced reducing capability. J Environ Chem Eng 8:103818

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Das P, Tantubay K, Ghosh R, Dam S, Sen MB (2021) Transformation of CuS/ZnS nanomaterials to an efficient visible light photocatalyst by “photosensitizer” graphene and the potential antimicrobial activities of the nanocomposites. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14068-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan W, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2013) Semiconductor-based nanocomposites for photocatalytic H2 production and CO2 conversion. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:2632–2649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen ML, Oh WC, Zhang FJ (2012) Photonic activity for MB solution of metal oxide/CNT catalysts derived from different organometallic compounds. Fuller Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct 20:127–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Das P, Ghosh S, Ghosh R, Dam S, Sen MB (2018) Madhuca longifolia plant mediated green synthesis of cupric oxide Nanoparticles: a promising environmentally sustainable material for waste water treatment and efficient antibacterial agent. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 189:66–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Prasad C, Liu Q, Tang H, Yuvaraja G, Long J, Rammohan A, Zyryanov GV (2020) An overview of graphene oxide supported semiconductors based photocatalysts: Properties, synthesis and photocatalytic applications. J Mol Liq 297:111826

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khanra P, Kuila T, Kim NH, Bae SH, Yu DS, Lee JH (2012) Simultaneous bio-functionalization and reduction of graphene oxide by baker’s yeast. Chem Eng J 183:526–533

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ng YH, Ikeda S, Matsumura M, Amal R (2012) A perspective on fabricating carbon-based nanomaterials by photocatalysis and their applications. Energy Environ Sci 5:9307–9318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leary R, Westwood A (2011) Carbonaceous nanomaterials for the enhancement of TiO2 photocatalysis. Carbon 49:741–772

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gandhi MR, Vasudevan S, Shibayama A, Yamada M (2016) Graphene and graphene-based composites: a rising star in water purification - A comprehensive overview. ChemistrySelect 1:4358–4385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sur UK (2012) Graphene: a rising star on the horizon of materials science. Int J electrochem 2012:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Singh P, Shandilya P, Raizada P, Sudhaik A, Sani AR, Bandegharaei AH (2020) Review on various strategies for enhancing photocatalytic activity of graphene based nanocomposites for water purification. Arab J Chem 13:3498–3520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Das P, Ghosh S, Sen MB (2019) Heterogeneous catalytic reduction of 4-Nitroaniline by RGO-Ni nanocomposite for water resource management. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 30:19731–19737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Q, Li X, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Yu J (2015) CdS/Graphene nanocomposite photocatalysts. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500010–1500038

    Google Scholar 

  34. Josephine DSR, Sakthivel B, Sethuraman K, Dhakshinamoorthy A (2016) Synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of CdS-graphene oxide nanocomposites. Chemistry Select 1:2332–2340

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu W, Peng C, Luo W, Lv M, Li X, Li D, Huang Q, Fan C (2010) Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 4:4317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tu Y, Lv M, Xiu P, Huynh T, Zhang M, Castelli M, Liu Z, Huang Q, Fan C, Fang H (2013) Destructive extration of phospholipids from Escherichia coli membranes by graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 8:594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Combarros R, Collado S, Díaz M (2016) Toxicity of graphene oxide on growth and metabolism of Pseudomonas putida. J Hazard Mater 310:246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Barbolina I, Woods C, Lozano N, Kostarelos K, Novoselov K, Roberts I (2016) Purity of graphene oxide determines its antibacterial activity. 2D Mater 3:025025

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pascual AMD (2020) Recent progress in antimicrobial nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 10:2315

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alayande AB, Park H, Vrouwenvelder JS, Kim IS (2019) Implications of chemical reduction using Hydriodic acid on the antimicrobial properties of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide membranes. Small 15:1901023

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang Z, Feng B, Xu J, Qing T, Zhang P, Qing Z (2020) Graphene biosensors for bacterial and viral pathogens. Biosens Bioelectron 166:112471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Long C, Li X, Jiang Z, Zhang P, Qing Z, Qing T, Feng B (2021) Adsorption-improved MoSe2 nanosheet by heteroatom doping and its application for simultaneous detection and removal of mercury (II). J Hazard Mater 413:125470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:1339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hasani A, Dehsari HS, Zarandi AA, Salehi A, Taromi FA, Kazeroni H (2015) Visible light-assisted photoreduction of graphene oxide using CdS nanoparticles and gas sensing properties. J Nanomater 930306:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  45. Prabhu RR, Khadar MA (2005) Characterization of chemically synthesized CdS nanoparticles. Pramana 65:801–807

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wu JL, Bai S, Shen XP, Jiang L (2010) Preparation and characterization of graphene/CdS nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 257:747–751

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Jiang N, Xiu Z, Xie Z, Li H, Zhao G, Wang W, Wu Y, Hao X (2014) Reduced graphene oxide–CdS nanocomposites with enhanced visible-light photoactivity synthesized using ionic-liquid precursors. New J Chem 38:4312–4320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lü W, Chen J, Wu Y, Duan L, Yang Y, Ge X (2014) Graphene-enhanced visible-light photocatalysis of large-sized CdS particles for wastewater treatment. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ma L, Ai X, Yang X, Song X, Wu X (2020) Dielectric and conductivity relaxation of rGO@CdS nanocomposites via in situ assembly of CdS nanoparticles on an rGO layer. J Phys Chem C 124:25133–25141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tauc JC (1972) Optical Properties of Solids Elsevier Amsterdam.

  51. Zhang Y, Tang ZR, Fu X, Xu YJ (2010) TiO2 graphene nanocomposites for gas-phase photocatalytic degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant: Is TiO2-graphene truly different from other TiO2-carbon composite materials? ACS Nano 4:7303–7314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ghosh S, Basu S, Sen MB (2017) Decorating mechanism of Mn3O4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide surface through reflux condensation method to improve photocatalytic performance. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:17860–17870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Imboon T, Khumphon J, Yotkuna K, Tang IM, Thongmee S (2021) Enhancement of photocatalytic by Mn3O4 spinel ferrite decorated graphene oxide nanocomposites. SN Appl Sci 3:653

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang N, Zhang Y, Pan X, Fu X, Liu S, Xu YJ (2011) Assembly of CdS nanoparticles on the two-dimensional graphene scaffold as visible-light-driven photocatalyst for selective organic transformation under ambient conditions. J Phys Chem C 115:23501–23511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Murugan AV, Muraliganth T, Manthiram A (2009) Rapid facile microwave-solvothermal synthesis of graphene nanosheets and their polyaniline nanocomposites for energy storage. Chem Mater 21:5004–5006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Yogamalar NR, Sadhanandam K, Bose AC, Jayavel R (2015) Quantum confined CdS inclusion in graphene oxide for improved electrical conductivity and facile charge transfer in hetero-junction solar cell. RSC Adv 5:16856–16869

    Google Scholar 

  57. Li Q, Guo B, Yu J, Ran J, Zhang B, Yan H, Gong JR (2011) Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 133:10878–10884

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cao A, Liu Z, Chu S, Wu M, Ye Z, Cai Z, Chang Y, Wang S, Gong Q, Liu Y (2010) A facile one-step method to produce graphene-CdS quantum dot nanocomposites as promising optoelectronic materials. Adv Mater 22:103–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ostwald W (1900) Über die vermeintliche isometric des roten undgelben quecksilberxyds und die oberflachenspannung fester körper. Z Phys Chem 34:495–503

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu X, Pan L, Lv T, Zhu G, Sun Z, Sun C (2011) Microwave-assisted synthesis of CdS–reduced graphene oxide composites for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). Chem Commun 47:11984–11986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Li Y, Gao B, Wu T, Sun D, Li X, Wang B, Lu F (2009) Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on aluminum magnesium mixed hydroxide. Water Res 43:3067–3075

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Weckhuysen BM, Wachs IE, Schoonheydt RA (1996) Surface chemistry and spcetroscopy of chromium in inorganic oxides. Chem Rev 96:3327–3349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Boruah PK, Borthakur P, Darabdhara G, Kamaj CK, Karbhal I, Shelke MV, Phukan P, Saikia D, Das MR (2016) Sunlight assisted degradation of dye molecules and reduction of toxic Cr(VI) in aqueous medium using magnetically recoverable Fe3O4/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. RSC Adv 6:11049–11063

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang K, Li H, Xu X, Yu H (2018) Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/NiO nanonanocomposites for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous water by adsorption. Micropor Mesopor Mat 255:7–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Padhi DK, Panigrahi TK, Parida K, Singh SK, Mishra PM (2017) Green synthesis of Fe3O4/RGO nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic performance for Cr(VI) reduction, phenol degradation, and antibacterial activity. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 5:10551–10562

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Sen MB, Ghosh S (2017) Enhanced sunlight photocatalytic activity of silver nanoparticles decorated on reduced graphene oxide sheet. Korean J Chem Eng 34:2079

    Google Scholar 

  67. Chen X, Wang X, Hou Y, Huang J, Wu L, Fu X (2008) The effect of post nitridation annealing on the surface property and photocatalytic performance of N-doped TiO2 under visible light irradiation. J Catal 255:59–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Mathew S, Ani Joseph S, Radhakrishnan P, Nampoori VPN, Vallabhan CPG (2011) Shifting of fluorescence peak in CdS nanoparticles by excitation wavelength change. J Fluoresc 21:1479–1484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hu L, Ma C, Chen G, Zhu Z (2020) Tuning the emission of CdS quantum dots with silver particles. J Lumin 220:116988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Javed H, Fatima K, Akhter Z, Nadeem MA, Siddiq M, Iqbal A (2016) Fluorescence modulation of cadmium sulfide quantum dots by azobenzene photochromic switches. Proc R Soc A 472:20150692

    Google Scholar 

  71. Park K, Yu HJ, Chung WK, Kim BJ, Kim SH (2009) Effect of heat-treatment on CdS and CdS/ZnS nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 44:4315–4320 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3641-2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Cong Y, Zhang J, Chen F, Anpo M (2007) Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanophotocatalyst with high visible light activity. J Phys Chem C 111:6976–6982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Liu S, Wei L, Hao L, Fang N, Chang MW, Xu R, Yang Y, Chen Y (2009) Sharper and faster “nano darts” kill more bacteria: a study of antibacterial activity of individually dispersed pristine single-walled carbon nanotube. ACS Nano 3:3891–3902

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Pan S, Liu X (2012) CdS–Graphene nanocomposite: synthesis, adsorption kinetics and high photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. New J Chem 36:1781–1787

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Moqbel RA, Gondal MA, Qahtan TF, Dastageer MA (2018) Synthesis of cadmium sulfide-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites by pulsed laser ablation in liquid for the enhanced photocatalytic reactions in the visible light. Int J Energy Res 2018:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ye A, Fan W, Zhang Q, Deng W, Wang Y (2012) CdS–graphene and CdS–CNT nanocomposites as visible-light photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution and organic dye degradation. Catal Sci Technol 2:969–978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Pawar RC, Lee CS (2013) Sensitization of CdS nanoparticles onto reduced graphene oxide (RGO) fabricated by chemical bath deposition method for effective removal of Cr(VI). Mater Chem Phys 141:686–693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang N, Yang MQ, Tang ZR, Xu YJ (2013) CdS–grapheme nanocomposites as visible light photocatalyst for redox reactions in water: a green route for selective transformation and environmental remediation. J Catal 303:60–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For giving permission to continue their research work, S.G. acknowledges Bazar Bonkapasi S.M. High School, Burdwan and P.D acknowledges Bagati Shib Chandra Banerjee Girls’ High School, Hooghly respectively. B.B acknowledges CSIR, New Delhi for financial support for continuing his research work. S.D. is thankful to DAE-BRNS, Govt. of India (Project No. 37 (1)/20/15/2014-BRNS) and CSIR, Govt. of India (Project No. 27(0322)/17/EMR-II) for financial assistance. We acknowledge University Science Instrumentation Center (USIC) for TEM and SEM facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Burdwan, West Bengal, 713104, India

    Sanjukta Ghosh, Piu Das, Bapan Bairy & Moni Baskey Sen

  2. Department of Microbiology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, 713104, India

    Raktim Ghosh & Somasri Dam

Authors
  1. Sanjukta Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Piu Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bapan Bairy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raktim Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Somasri Dam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Moni Baskey Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SG contributed to writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, conceptualization, methodology, investigation. PD contributed to validation, conceptualization, data curation, visualization, funding acquisition. BB contributed to data curation and formal analysis. RG contributed to methodology and validation. SD contributed to formal analysis and investigation. MBS contributed to supervision, writing and conceptualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moni Baskey Sen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Andrea de Camargo.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised to correct an error in the author affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 454 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., Das, P., Bairy, B. et al. Exploration of photoreduction ability of reduced graphene oxide–cadmium sulphide hetero-nanostructures and their intensified activities against harmful microbes. J Mater Sci 56, 16928–16944 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06349-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06349-4

Search

Navigation