Skip to main content
Log in

WATCHMAN implantation in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and intracranial hemorrhage

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is often considered high risk as OAC-related ICH is associated with high mortality rates. Left atrial appendage closure with a WATCHMAN device is an alternative management strategy to OAC to decrease thrombotic risk in atrial fibrillation patients; however use of OAC followed by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or DAPT therapy alone is required for 6 months post-procedurally. In this study, we examined the safety of WATCHMAN implantation followed by 6 months of anti-thrombotic therapy in patients with a history of ICH.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 63 patients with a history of ICH prior to WATCHMAN implantation (Group I) and 95 patients without a history of ICH who underwent WATCHMAN placement (Group II). The primary outcome was death, stroke, or major bleeding within 6 months of WATCHMAN placement.

Results

The average CHA2DS2-VASc of Group I was 4.9 ± 1.7 vs 4.7 ± 1.4 for Group II (p = 0.34). The most common type of ICH in Group I was an intracerebral hemorrhage (57%). The median time between ICH and WATCHMAN implantation in Group I patients was 212 days. A total of 19% of Group I patients were managed with DAPT alone post-procedurally vs. 3% in Group II (p < 0.001). Similar to 89% of Group II (p = 0.19), 95% of Group I patients were free of the primary outcome at 6 months. No Group I patients had recurrent ICH within 6 months after WATCHMAN implantation.

Conclusion

In a retrospective, multicenter series of patients with a history of ICH prior to WATCHMAN implantation, WATCHMAN placement was performed safely with 6-month outcomes that were similar to patients without a history of ICH, encompassing the time during which a patient with a history of ICH would need antithrombotic therapy to facilitate WATCHMAN placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACT:

Activated clotting time

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

DAPT:

Dual antiplatelet therapy

DOAC:

Direct oral anticoagulant

GI:

Gastrointestinal

ICH:

Intracranial hemorrhage

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

LAA:

Left atrial appendage

LAAC:

Left atrial appendage closure

OAC:

Oral anticoagulation

TEE:

Trans-esophageal echo

CAA:

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy

References

  1. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9689):534–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reddy VY, Möbius-Winkler S, Miller MA, Neuzil P, Schuler G, Wiebe J, et al. Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for Oral anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(25):2551–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurol ME. Nonpharmacological Management of Atrial Fibrillation in patients at high intracranial hemorrhage risk. Stroke. 2018;49(1):247–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Majeed A, Kim YK, Roberts RS, Holmström M, Schulman S. Optimal timing of resumption of warfarin after intracranial hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010;41(12):2860–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fahmy P, Spencer R, Tsang M, Gooderham P, Saw J. Left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation is safe and effective after intracranial or intraocular hemorrhage. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(3):349–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hutt E, Wazni OM, Saliba WI, Kanj M, Tarakji KG, Aguilera J, et al. Left atrial appendage closure device implantation in patients with prior intracranial hemorrhage. Heart Rhythm. 2018;16(5):663–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boersma LV, Ince H, Kische S, Pokushalov E, Schmitz T, Schmidt B, et al. Evaluating real-world clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients receiving the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure technology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(4):e006841. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomaselli GF, Mahaffey KW, Cuker A, Dobesh PP, Doherty JU, Eikelboom JW, et al. 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on Management of Bleeding in patients on Oral anticoagulants: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on expert consensus decision pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(24):3042–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes, D. R., Kar, S., Price, M. J., Whisenant, B., Sievert, H., Doshi, S. K., … Reddy, V. Y. (2014). Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64(1), 1–12. D.

  10. Majule DN, Jing C, Rutahoile WM, Shonyela FS. The efficacy and safety of the WATCHMAN device in LAA occlusion in patients with non-Valvular atrial fibrillation contraindicated to Oral anticoagulation: a focused review. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;24(6):271–8.

  11. Hemphill, J. C., Greenberg, S. M., Anderson, C. S., Becker, K., Bendok, B. R., Cushman, M., … Council on Clinical Cardiology. (2015). Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 46(7), 2032–2060.

  12. Nielsen PB, Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Rasmussen LH, Lip GYH. Restarting anticoagulant treatment after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation and the impact on recurrent stroke, mortality, and BleedingCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE. Circulation. 2015;132(6):517–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nielsen PB, Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Lip GYH. Outcomes associated with resuming warfarin treatment after hemorrhagic stroke or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;77(4):563–70.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tzikas A, Freixa X, Llull L, Gafoor S, Shakir S, Omran H, et al. Patients with intracranial bleeding and atrial fibrillation treated with left atrial appendage occlusion: results from the Amplatzer cardiac plug registry. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:232–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Renou P, Thambo J-B, Iriart X, Nicot S, Kabore N, Jalal Z, et al. Left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous Intracerebral hemorrhage. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association. 2017;26(3):545–51.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dukkipati SR, Kar S, Holmes DR, Doshi SK, Swarup V, Gibson DN, et al. Device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Circulation. 2018;138:874–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reddy, V. Y., Doshi, S. K., Kar, S., Gibson, D. N., Price, M. J., Huber, K., Horton R.P., Buchbinder M., Neuzil P., Gordon N.T., Holmes DR Jr, PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators. (2017). 5-year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure. J Am Coll Cardiol, 70(24), 2964–2975.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moussa Mansour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EK Heist is a consultant at Boston Scientific, Abbott. Research Grants: Boston Scientific, Abbott. L DiBiase is a consultant at Biosense Webster, Stereotaxis and speaker honoraria/travel support at Biosense Webster, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb. R Horton is a consultant at Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott. Research grants were received from Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott. D Lakkireddy is a consultant at Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Sentre Heart. Research grants were received from Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Sentre Heart. A Natale is a consultant at Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic. Research grants were received from Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott.

M Mansour is a consultant at Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, Johnson and Johnson, Janssen, Philips, Novartis, Sentre Heart. Research grants were received from Biosense-Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sentre Heart, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic. He has an equity from EPS Solutions, New Pace Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hucker, W.J., Cohen, J.A., Gurol, M.E. et al. WATCHMAN implantation in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and intracranial hemorrhage. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 59, 415–421 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00678-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00678-w

Keywords

Navigation