Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of team task and job engagement on the transfer of tacit knowledge in e-business virtual teams

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research focuses on the initiative to integrate team task and job engagement as related to the transfer of tacit knowledge. The aim of this study is to investigate if team task and job involvement enhances the overall work efficiency through transfer of tacit knowledge between e-business virtual teams. We develop a model that is based on the relationship between tacit degree of knowledge, job engagement, team tasks, and their effect on knowledge transfer. The conceptual model is validated with the data collected from a survey. The results indicate that the tacit knowledge does not have a positive effect on team tasks and job engagement, and the team tasks and job engagement have a significant positive effect on knowledge transfer. In addition, the study found that team tasks and job engagement have mediating effects in the process of tacit knowledge transfer. Also, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications and contributions of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolisani E, Scarso E (1999) Information technology management: a knowledge-based perspective. Technovation 19(4):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao X, Yang F (2011) Measuring the performance of Internet companies using a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Enterp Inf Syst 5(2):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyer J, Nobeoka K (2002) Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21(3):345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyerson R, Mueller F (1999) Learning, teamwork and appropriability: managing technological change in the Department of Social Security. J Manage Stud 36(5):629–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu C, Zhang G, Yang J, Liu X (2011) Study on the contract characteristics of Internet architecture. Enterp Inf Syst 5(4):495–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. George FJ, Jessup L (1997) Groups over time what are we really studying. Int J Hum Comput Stud 47(3):497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grant RM (1996) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environment: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ Sci 7(4):375–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo J, Xu L, Gong Z, Che C, Chaudhry S (2012) Semantic inference on heterogeneous e-marketplace activities. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 42(2):316–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv Bus Rev 77(2):106–115,187

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hatch NW, Dyer JH (2004) Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 25(12):1155–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho CH, Kauffman RJ, Liang TP (2011) Inter-based selling technology and e-commerce growth: a hybrid growth theory approach with cross-model inference. Inf Technol Manage 12:409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag J 33(4):692–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahn WA (1992) To be fully there: psychological presence at work. Hum Relat 45(4):321–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J Int Bus Stud 24(4):625–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li L (2011) Introduction: advances in e-business engineering. Inf Technol Manage 12(2):49–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li L (2012) Effects of enterprise technology on supply chain collaboration: analysis of China-linked supply chain. Enterp Inf Syst 6(1):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li L, Warfield J (2011) Perspectives on quality coordination and assurance in global supply chains. Int J Prod Res 49(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu B, Cao S, He W (2011) Distributed data mining for e-business. Inf Technol Manage 12(2):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lubit R (2001) Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: the keys to sustainable competitive advantage. Organ Dyn 29(3):164–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martins LL, Gilson LL, Maynard MT (2004) Virtual teams: what do we know and where do we go from here? J Manag 30(6):805–835

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, USA

  25. Nonaka I (2007) The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev 85(7/8):162–171

    Google Scholar 

  26. Piao C, Han X, Wu H (2010) Research on e-commerce transaction networks using multi-agent modelling and open application programming interface. Enterp Inf Syst 4(3):329–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Polanyi M (2009) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qian Y, Jin B, Fang W (2011) Heuristic algorithms for effective broker deployment. Inf Technol Manage 12(2):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quesada J, Kintsch W, Gomez E (2005) Complex problem-solving: a field in search of a definition? Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6(1):5–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudolph C (2012) Trust areas: a security paradigm for the future Internet. In: Meadows C, Fernández-Gago C (eds) LNCS 7170, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 22–27

  32. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker AB (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud 3(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Song M, Berends H, Van Der Bij H, Weggeman M (2007) The effect of IT and co-location on knowledge dissemination. J Prod Innov Manage 24(1):52–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Su SB (2010) Intellectual property rights conflict and coordination management in knowledge transfer for electronic business partners. Sci Technol Manag Res 10:143–160 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediment to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(1):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tan W, Shen W, Xu L, Zhou B, Li L (2008) A business process intelligence system for enterprise process performance management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 38(6):745–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan W, Xu Y, Xu W, Xu L, Zhao X, Wang L, Fu L (2010) A Methodology toward manufacturing grid-based virtual enterprise operation platform. Enterp Inf Syst 4(3):283–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Townsend AM, DeMarie SM, Hendrickson AR (1998) Virtual team: technology and the workplace of the future. Acad Manag Executive 12(3):17–29

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van der Aa W, Elfring T (2002) Realizing innovation in services. Scand J Manag 18(2):155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang J, Wu H (2011) Supporting process design for e-business via an integrated process repository. Inf Technol Manage 12(2):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wei J, Wang T (2006) An empirical research on the factors influencing knowledge transfer among individual, group and organization. Stud Sci Sci 24(1):91–97 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xu L (2011) Enterprise systems: state-of-the-art and future trends. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 7(4):630–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu L (2011) Information architecture for supply chain quality management. Int J Prod Res 49(1):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu L, Tan W, Zhen H, Shen W (2008) An approach to enterprise process dynamic modeling supporting enterprise process evolution. Inf Syst Front 10(5):611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organ Sci 6(1):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, W., Xu, L., Liang, L. et al. The impact of team task and job engagement on the transfer of tacit knowledge in e-business virtual teams. Inf Technol Manag 13, 333–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0129-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0129-6

Keywords

Navigation