Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How well do single samples reflect rotifer species diversity? A test based on interannual variation of rotifer communities in Big Bend National Park (Texas, USA)

  • Advances in Rotifer Research
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of rotifer community composition and dynamics often rely on limited sampling regimes. To determine how well species richness is reflected in these studies, we examined interannual variation of rotifer species richness and monogonont community structure from 10 aquatic systems comprising four habitat types—springs, rock pools (tinajas), former cattle tanks, and artificial ponds—in Big Bend National Park (Texas, USA). Planktonic, littoral, and benthic samples were collected from all sites at about the same date for each of five summers (2001–2005). Our survey yielded 15 monogonont families including 30 genera and 84 species. Two bdelloid taxa also were designated. Species richness varied widely among these four habitats: range, 1–32; mean (±1 SD), 11.2 ± 8.0. Total Species richness in the habitats also varied considerably: springs (54 taxa) > artificial ponds (35 taxa) > tinajas (19 taxa)  > cattle tanks (15 taxa). Sessile species comprised ≈13% of the taxa in our samples. Species turnover indices (STI) of these systems indicate low overall relatedness: mean (±1 S.D.) = 85.2 ± 7.1%. The relative frequency of encounter of most taxa in the four systems was low, with 79 taxa (≈92%) having values ≤2.0%. Singleton rates were quite high, ranging from 46.7 to 71.4%, with an overall mean ≈65.1%. Most importantly, we found that both species richness and STI varied considerably among habitat type. Species richness varied by 2–10× between consecutive years and STI ranged from 64 to 89% over the entire study. Our results indicate that rotifer community composition fluctuates greatly over time, and that rotifer community structure may be more labile than is generally believed. Species richness and thus biodiversity may be dramatically underestimated using single sampling or short-term strategies that are often employed in studies of zooplankton community structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowles, D. E., 2000. A preliminary assessment of the diversity and distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates in Big Bend National Park, Texas. Final report to BBNP: 1–23.

  • Brower, J. E., J. H. Zar & C. N. von Ende, 1998. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts: 1–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, G., 1981. Springs of Texas. Volume One. Branch Smith, Inc. Fort Worth, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, B. B., S. C. Antunes, R. Pereira, A. M. V. M. Soares & F. Gonçalves, 2005. Rotifer community structure in three shallow lakes: seasonal fluctuations and explanatory factors. Hydrobiologia 543: 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chengalath, R. & W. Koste, 1987. Rotifera from Northwestern Canada. Hydrobiologia 147: 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, K. L., S. Glaholt & A. C. Brown, 2004. Zooplankton community structure affects how phytoplankton respond to nutrient pulses. Ecology 85: 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, R. B. & D. B. Lindenmayer, 2005. Modeling count data of rare species: some statistical issues. Ecology 86: 1135–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dartnall, H. J. G., 1995. Rotifers, and other aquatic invertebrates, from the Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 129: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartnall, H. J. G. & E. D. Hollowday, 1985. Antarctic rotifers. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports 100: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder, M., 1987. Distribution of rotifers in African fresh and inland saline waters. Hydrobiologia 147: 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Smet, W. H., 1989. Rotifera uit Galápagoseilanden. Natuurwet. Tijdschr. 69: 110–131.

  • Dinerstein, E., D. Olson, J. Atchley, C. Loucks, S. Contreras-Balderas, R. Abell, E. Inigo, E. Enkerlin, C. Williams & G. Castilleja, 2000. Ecoregion-based conservation in the Chihuahuan Desert: a biological assessment. World Wildlife Fund.

  • Dumont, H. J., 1983. Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, H. J. & H. Segers, 1996. Estimating lacustrine zooplankton species richness and complementarity. Hydrobiologia 341: 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T. & A. Litt, 1987. Conochilus in Lake Washington. Hydrobiologia 147: 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejsmont-Karabin, J., 1995. Rotifer occurrence in relation to age, depth and trophic state of quarry lakes. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel, T., G. F. Esteban & B. J. Finlay, 1997. Local versus global diversity of microorganisms: cryptic diversity of ciliated protozoa. Oikos 80: 220–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel, T. & B. J. Finlay, 2004. The ubiquity of small species. Patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54: 777–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, B. J., 2002. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryotic species. Science 296: 1061–1063.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaneto, D., G. Melone & C. Ricci, 2005. Connectivity and nestedness of the meta-community structure of moss dwelling rotifers along a stream. Hydrobiologia 542: 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaneto, D., G. F. Ficetola, R. Ambrosini & C. Ricci, 2006. Patterns and diversity in microscopic animals: are they comparable to those in protists or in larger animals? Global Ecology and Biogeography 15: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., 1985. Horizontal variations in associations of zooplankton in Lake Kariba. Journal of Zoology, London 206: 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. D., A. L. Ooms-Wilms, O. F. R. Van Tongeren, G. Postema & K. Siewertsen, 1992. The dynamics and role of limnetic zooplankton in Loosdrecht lakes (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 233: 69–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllström, M., L.-A. Hansson, E. Jeppesen, F. García-Criado, E. Gross, K. Irvine, T. Kairesalo, R. Kornijow, M. R. Miracle, M. Nykänen, T. Nõges, S. Romo, S. Stephen, E. Van Donk & B. Moss, 2005. The role of climate in shaping zooplankton communities of shallow lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 50: 2008–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halse, S. A., R. J. Shiel & W. D. Williams, 1998. The relationship between salinity, ionic composition and the invertebrate fauna of Lake Gregory. In Zheng M., S. H.Hurlbert & W. D.Williams (eds), Saline Lakes VI. Hydrobiologia 381: 15–29.

  • Halvorsen, G., B. Dervo & K. Papinska, 2004. Zooplankton of Lake Atnsjøen 1895–1997. Hydrobiologia 521: 149–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, S. E., 2005. Increased niche differentiation between two Conochilus species over 33 years of climate change and food web alteration. Limnology and Oceanography 50: 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, S. E. & D. E. Schindler, 2006. Empirical evaluation of observation scale effects in community time series. Oikos 113: 424–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A., 1987. The analysis of planktonic rotifer populations: a plea for long-term investigations. Hydrobiologia 147: 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, O. T. & C. A. Bane, 1980. Aquatic ecosystems of Big Bend National Park: biological and chemical indicators of water quality. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Scientific Resources in National Parks, Vol. 2. Aquatic Biology, San Francisco, CA. pp. 7–29.

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, N. Sutton, K. Kawanishi & L. Bailey, 2005. Improving inferences in population studies of rare species that are detected imperfectly. Ecology 86: 1101–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, L., 1986. Rotifer sampling – A complete species list from one visit? Hydrobiologia 134: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L., 1987. Effect of incubation temperature on the hatching of rotifer resting eggs collected from sediments. Hydrobiologia 147: 335–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, C. X. & R. K. Colwell, 2005. Estimation of species richness: mixture models, the role of rare species, and inferential challenges. Ecology 86: 1143–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, J. R., J. Ejsmont-Karabin & H. J. MacIsaac, 2006. Quantifying rotifer species richness in temperate lakes. Freshwater Biology 51: 1696–1709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neves, I. F., O. Rocha, K. F. Roche & A. A. Pinto, 2003. Zooplankton community structure of two marginal lakes of the River Cuiabà (Mato Grosso, Brazil) with analysis of Rotifera and Cladocera diversity. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 329–343.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. M. & E. Dinerstein, 1998. The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology 12: 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortells, R., A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2003. Coexistence of cryptic rotifer species: ecological and genetic characterization of Brachionus plicatilis. Freshwater Biology 48: 2194–2202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, A., 2002. Proliferation of cryptic protists and germination of resting stages from untreated sediment samples with emphasis on dinoflagellates. Ophelia 55: 152–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quispel, A., 1998. Lourens G. M. Baas Becking (1895–1963), inspirator for many (micro)biologists. International Microbiology 1: 69–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H., 2002. The nomenclature of the Rotifera: annotated checklist of valid family- and genus-groups names. Journal of Natural History 36: 631–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H. & H. J. Dumont, 1993a. Rotifera from Arabia, with descriptions of two new species. Fauna Saudi Arabia 13: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H. & H. J. Dumont, 1993b. Zoogeography of Pacific Ocean islands: comparison of the rotifer faunas of Easter Island and the Galápagos archipelago. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 475–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H. & H. J. Dumont, 1995. 102+ rotifer species (Rotifera: Monogononta) in Broa reservoir (SP., Brazil) on 26 August 1994, with the description of three new species. Hydrobiologia 316: 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H., N. Emir & J. Mertens, 1992. Rotifera from north and northeast Anatolia (Turkey). Hydrobiologia 245: 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H., D. K. Mbogo & H. J. Dumont, 1994. New Rotifera from Kenya, with a revision of the Ituridae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Z., P. Xie & Y. Zhuge, 2001. Long-term changes of planktonic rotifers in a subtropical Chinese lake dominated by filter-feeding fishes. Freshwater Biology 46: 973–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, R. J., J. F. Costelloe, J. R. W. Reid, P. Hudson & J. Powling, 2006. Zooplankton diversity and assemblages in arid zone rivers of the Lake Eyre Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 57: 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, C. A., J. W. S. Quinn & J. A. Bloomfield, 1984. Lake acidification and the biology of Adirondack lakes: I. Rotifer communities. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Limnologie 22: 549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1998. Small-sized invertebrates in a gravel stream: community structure and variability of benthic rotifers. Freshwater Biology 39: 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, C. F., 2005. Temporal stability of pond zooplankton assemblages. Freshwater Biology 50: 105–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uku, J. N. & K. M. Mavuti, 1994. Comparataive limnology, species diversity and biomass relationship of zooplankton and phytoplankton in five freshwater lakes in Kenya. Hydrobiologia 272: 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. L., T. W. Snell, C. Ricci & T. Nogrady, 2006. Rotifera: Volume 1 Biology, Ecology and Systematics. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 23 (Dumont, H.J., ed.). Kenobi Productions, Ghent, and Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.

  • Wallace, R. L., E. J. Walsh, M. L. Arroyo & P. L. Starkweather, 2005. Life on the edge: rotifers from springs and ephemeral waters in the Chihuahuan Desert, Big Bend National Park (Texas, USA). Hydrobiologia 546: 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, E. J., M. L. Arroyo, T. Schröder & R. L. Wallace (2007, in press). Species richness and species turnover (complementarity) of Rotifera in selected aquatic systems of Big Bend National Park, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist.

  • Worm, B. & J. E. Duffy, 2003. Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 628–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We offer our sincere thanks to C. Purchase, R. Skiles, and the staff of BBNP; this research was carried out under BBNP permits BIBE-2001-SCI-0058 and BIBE-2001-SCI-0012. Invaluable field and laboratory assistance was provided D. L. Leeming, O. Moldes, J. and B. Newlin, C. Ordonez, J. Remirez, J.V. Rios-Arana, M. Salazar, M. Sigla Arana, P.L. Starkweather, N. Lannutti, R. Guerrero, M. Voss, and T. Enriquez. We thank Jolanta Ejsmont-Karabin for providing the comprehensive data on the rotifer fauna from the Great Masurian lakes (Poland). Hilary A. Smith assisted in calculating the relative frequency of encounter and IFO values and offered constructive comments on the manuscript. We also thank Koen Martens and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. This material is based upon work partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0516032, T & E, Inc., the Graduate School of UTEP, Funds for Faculty Development (Ripon College), NSF Advance #0245071 (UTEP) and grants from T.O.P. to EJW and RLW.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA

    E. J. Walsh, T. Schröder & M. L. Arroyo

  2. Department of Biology, Ripon College, Ripon, WI, 54971, USA

    R. L. Wallace

Authors
  1. E. J. Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Schröder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. L. Arroyo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. L. Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. J. Walsh.

Additional information

Guest editors: S. S. S. Sarma, R. D. Gulati, R. L. Wallace, S. Nandini, H. J. Dumont & R. Rico-Martínez

Advances in Rotifer Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walsh, E.J., Schröder, T., Arroyo, M.L. et al. How well do single samples reflect rotifer species diversity? A test based on interannual variation of rotifer communities in Big Bend National Park (Texas, USA). Hydrobiologia 593, 39–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9048-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9048-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation