Skip to main content
Log in

Development of DArT markers and evaluation of phylogenetic relationship of key Citrus species

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past decades, studies based on DNA markers have been widely conducted to understand the phylogenetic relationship of Citrus species. The recent development of diversity arrays technology (DArT) offers new possibilities to study the phylogenetic relationship of Citrus species. Here, we report the successful development of DArT microarrays and their utility in phylogenetic analysis of Citrus species. The DArT microarrays revealed a total 727 polymorphic markers with an average call rate of 91.16 % and a scoring reproducibility of 96.5 %. Phylogenetic analyses based on DArT markers strongly supported delineation of the genus Citrus as a monophyletic group. Most Citrus species analyzed formed different clusters, but Ichang papeda and Mangshan wild mandarin formed separate clusters as two single branches, suggesting that various mandarin accessions have different genetic backgrounds. As the first attempt to develop a high-throughput DArT markers system for the genus Citrus, the present study generated significant information about the genetic relationship between cultivated species and their putative wild progenitors, which suggested that the DArT markers system could be a powerful tool to study the genetic relationships of the genus Citrus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbari M, Wenzl P, Caig V, Carling J, Xia L, Yang S, Uszynski G, Mohler V, Lehmensiek A, Kuchel H, Hayden MJ, Howes N, Sharp P, Vaughan P, Rathmell B, Huttner E, Kilian A (2006) Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for high-throughput profiling of the hexaploid wheat genome. Theor Appl Genet 113:1409–1420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amar MH, Biswas MK, Zhang Z, Guo WW (2011) Exploitation of SSR, SRAP and CAPS-SNP markers for genetic diversity of Citrus germplasm collection. Sci Hortic 128:220–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley NA, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT (2006) Assessing genetic diversity and population structure in a citrus germplasm collection utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Theor Appl Genet 112:1519–1531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett HC, Rhodes AM (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated Citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1:105–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer RJ, Mabberley DJ, Morton C, Miller CH, Sharma IK, Pfeil BE, Rich S, Hitchcock R, Sykes S (2009) A molecular phylogeny of the orange subfamily (Rutaceae: Aurantioideae) using nine cpDNA sequences. Am J Bot 96:668–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, De Vicente MC, Meng H, Guo W, Tao N, Deng X (2005) A set of primers for analyzing chloroplast DNA diversity in Citrus and related genera. Tree Physiol 25:661–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Moraes AP, dos Santos Soares Filho W, Guerra M (2007) Karyotype diversity and the origin of grapefruit. Chromosome Res 15:115–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang DQ (1993) Intra- and intergeneric relationships of Poncirus polyandar: investigation by leaf isozymes. J Wuhan Bot Res 11:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici CT, Fang DQ, Scora RW, Roose ML (1998) Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 96:812–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package. Cladistics 5:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Froelicher Y, Mouhaya W, Bassene JB, Costantino G, Kamiri M, Luro F, Morillon R, Ollitrault P (2011) New universal mitochondrial PCR markers reveal new information on maternal citrus phylogeny. Tree Genet Genomes 7:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Lor A, Curk F, Snoussi-Trifa H, Morillon R, Ancillo G, Luro F, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2013) A nuclear phylogenetic analysis: SNPs, indels and SSRs deliver new insights into the relationships in the ‘true citrus fruit trees’ group (Citrinae, Rutaceae) and the origin of cultivated species. Ann Bot 111:1–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gmitter FG (1995) Origin, evolution and breeding of the grapefruit. Plant Breed Rev 13:345–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Golein B, Nazeryan M, Babakhani B (2012) Assessing genetic variability in male sterile and low fertile citrus cultivars utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Afr J Biotechnol 11:1632–1638

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gulsen O, Uzun A, Canan I, Seday U, Canihos E (2010) A new citrus linkage map based on SRAP, SSR, ISSR, POGP, RGA and RAPD markers. Euphytica 173:265–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handa T, Ishizawa Y, Oogaki C (1986) Phylogenetic study of fraction I protein in the genus Citrus and its close related genera. Jpn J Genet 61:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika TK (2012) Citrus genetic diversity of north-east India, their distribution, ecogeography and ecobiology. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:1267–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero R, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA, Navarro L (1996) Genetic diversity in the orange subfamily Aurantioideae. I. Intraspecies and intragenus genetic variability. Theor Appl Genet 92:599–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccoud D, Peng K, Feinstein D, Kilian A (2001) Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • James KE, Schneider H, Ansell SW, Evers M, Robba L, Uszynski G, Pedersen N, Newton AE, Russell SJ, Vogel JC, Kilian A (2008) Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for pan-genomic evolutionary studies of non-model organisms. PLoS ONE 3:e1682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian A, Huttner E, Wenzl P, Jaccoud D, Carling J, Caig V, Evers M, Heller-Uszynska K, Uszynski G, Cayla C, Patarapuwadol S, Xia L, Yang S, Thomson B (2003) The fast and the cheap: SNP and DArT-based whole genome profiling for crop improvement. In: Tuberosa R, Philips RL, Gale M (eds) (2005) In proceedings of the international congress “In the wake of the double helix: from the green revolution to the gene revolution”. Bologna, Italy, pp 443–461

  • Lezar S, Myburg AA, Berger DK, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2004) Development and assessment of microarray-based DNA fingerprinting in Eucalyptus grandis. Theor Appl Genet 109:1329–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li WB, Liu GF, He SW (1992) Leaf isozymes of mandarin. Proc Int Soc Citricult 1:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XM, Xie RJ, Lu ZH, Zhou ZQ (2010) The origin of cultivated citrus as inferred from internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast DNA sequence and amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprints. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 135:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SR, Li WY, Long D, Hu CG, Zhang JZ (2013) Development and characterization of genomic and expressed SSRs in citrus by genome-wide analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e75149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luro F, Rist D, Ollitrault P (2001) Evaluation of genetic relationships in Citrus genus by means of sequence tagged microsatellites. Acta Hortic 546:237–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik MN (1973) A new concept in Citrus classification. Pak J Sci Res 25:268–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik MN, Scora RW, Soost RK (1974) Studies on the origin of the lemon. Hilgardia 42:361–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA (2001) Oranges and lemons: clues to the taxonomy of Citrus from molecular markers. Trends Genet 17:536–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi E, Deng ZN, Gentile A, La Malfa S, Continella G, Tribulato E (2000) Citrus phylogeny and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 100:1155–1166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ollitrault F, Terol J, Martin AA, Pina JA, Navarro L, Talon M, Ollitrault P (2012a) Development of indel markers from Citrus clementina (Rutaceae) BAC-end sequences and interspecific transferability in Citrus. Am J Bot 2012:e268–e273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollitrault P, Terol J, Garcia-Lor A, Bérard A, Chauveau A, Froelicher Y, Belzile C, Morillon R, Navarro L, Brunel D, Talon M (2012b) SNP mining in C. clementina BAC end sequences; transferability in the Citrus genus (Rutaceae), phylogenetic inferences and perspectives for genetic mapping. BMC Genom 13:13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pang XM, Hu CG, Deng XX (2007) Phylogenetic relationships within Citrus and its related genera as inferred from AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:429–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penjor T, Anai T, Nagano Y, Matsumoto R, Yamamoto M (2010) Phylogenetic relationships of Citrus and its relatives based on rbcL gene sequences. Tree Genet Genomes 6:931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penjor T, Yamamoto M, Uehara M, Ide M, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto R, Nagano Y (2013) Phylogenetic relationships of Citrus and its relatives based on matk gene sequences. PLoS ONE 8(4):e62574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pessina D, Gentili R, Barcaccia G, Nicolè S, Rossi G, Barbesti S, Sgorbati S (2011) DNA content, morphometric and molecular marker analyses of Citrus limonimedica, C. limon and C. medica for the determination of their variability and genetic relationships within the genus Citrus. Sci Hortic 129:663–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polat I, Kacar YA, Yesiloglu T, Uzun A, Tuzcu O, Gulsen O, Incesu M, Kafa G, Turgutoglu E, Anil S (2012) Molecular characterization of sour orange (Citrus aurantium) accessions and their relatives using SSR and SRAP markers. Genet Mol Res 11:3267–3276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scora RW (1975) On the history and origin of Citrus. Bull Torrey Bot Club 102:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scora RW (1988) Biochemistry, taxonomy and evolution of modern cultivated citrus. In: Goren R, Mendel K (eds) Proceedings 6th International Citrus Congress, Margraf, Weikersheim, Germany, pp 277–289

  • Shrestha RL, Dhakal DD, Gautum DM, Paudyal KP, Shrestha S (2012) Genetic diversity assessment of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) landraces in Nepal, using SSR markers. Am J Plant Sci 3:1674–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swingle WT (1943) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives of the orange subfamily. In: Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley, pp 129–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle WT, Reece PC (1967) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley, pp 190–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T (1977) Fundamental discussion of citrus classification. Stud Citrol 14:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres AM, Soost RK, Diedenhofen U (1978) Leaf isozymes as genetic markers in Citrus. Am J Bot 65:869–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun A, Gulsen O, Yesıloglu T, Aka-Kacar Y, Tuzcu O (2010) Distinguishing grapefruit and pummelo accessions using ISSR markers. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 46:170–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun A, Gulsen O, Seday U, Yesiloglu T, Aka-kacar Y, Tuzcu O (2011) Investigation of genetic relationships among trifoliata oranges and their hybrid relatives based on ISSR markers. Roman Biotechnol Lett 16

  • Webber HJ, Reuther W, Lawton HW (1967) History and development of the citrus industry. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The citrus industry. University of California, Berkeley, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzl P, Carling J, Kudrna D, Jaccoud D, Huttner E, Kleinhofs A, Kilian A (2004) Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9915–9920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu GA, Prochnik S, Jenkins J, Salse J, Hellsten U, Murat F, Perrier X, Ruiz M, Scalabrin S, Terol J, Takita MA, Labadie K, Poulain J, Couloux A, Jabbari K, Cattonaro F, Del Fabbro C, Pinosio S, Zuccolo A, Chapman J, Grimwood J, Tadeo FR, Estornell LH, Muñoz-Sanz JV, Ibanez V, Herrero-Ortega A, Aleza P, Pérez-Pérez J, Ramón D, Brunel D, Luro F, Chen C, Farmerie WG, Desany B, Kodira C, Mohiuddin M, Harkins T, Fredrikson K, Burns P, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M, Reforgiato G, Freitas-Astúa J, Quetier F, Navarro L, Roose M, Wincker P, Schmutz J, Morgante M, Machado MA, Talon M, Jaillon O, Ollitrault P, Gmitter F, Rokhsar D (2014) Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nat Biotechnol 32:656–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Peng K, Yang S, Wenzl P, De Vicente MC, Fregene M, Kilian A (2005) DArT for high-throughput genotyping of cassava (Manihot esculenta) and its wild relatives. Theor Appl Genet 110:1092–1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171930).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqin Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Tang, L., Wu, H. et al. Development of DArT markers and evaluation of phylogenetic relationship of key Citrus species. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63, 1307–1318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0319-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0319-2

Keywords

Navigation