Abstract
The paper pertains to the development of a generalized procedure to analyze and predict the flexural behavior of axially and laterally loaded pile foundations under liquefied soil conditions. Pseudo-static analysis has been carried out taking into consideration the combined effect of axial load and lateral load. Based on the available literature effect of degradation on the modulus of subgrade reaction due to soil liquefaction has been incorporated in the analysis. The developed program was calibrated and validated by comparing the predicted behavior of the pile with theoretical and experimental results reported in literature. The predicted behavior has been found to be in excellent to very good agreement with the theoretical and observed values in the field, respectively. The present study highlights the importance of considering the axial load from the superstructure along with the inertia forces from the superstructure and the kinematic forces from the liquefied soil in the design of pile foundations in liquefiable areas. The significance of densification of the soil in the liquefiable areas and presence of an adequate top non-liquefied soil cover causing appreciable reduction in deflection and bending moment experienced by the piles has been highlighted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h :
-
Coefficients of boundary conditions;
- A :
-
Stiffness matrix
- B :
-
Force vector
- C :
-
Modified displacement coefficient matrix
- D :
-
Diameter of the pile
- E p :
-
Modulus of elasticity of the pile
- E s :
-
Modulus of elasticity of the soil
- E 0 :
-
Modulus of deformation of the soil
- F :
-
Displacement coefficient matrix
- {g}:
-
Ground displacement vector
- g max :
-
Maximum possible permanent horizontal ground displacement of the liquefied soil
- g rs :
-
Permanent horizontal displacement of the level ground far away from the water front
- g w :
-
Displacement of the quay wall
- g x :
-
Horizontal ground displacement at a distance x from the waterfront
- g (z, x) :
-
Permanent horizontal ground displacement profile with depth, z at a distance, x from the waterfront
- g 0 :
-
Permanent horizontal ground displacement at the waterfront
- G :
-
Modification factor
- H :
-
Horizontal load factor
- H T :
-
Horizontal load applied at the pile top
- I p :
-
Moment of inertia of the pile
- J :
-
Coefficient matrix
- k :
-
Matrix for the modulus of subgrade reaction
- k h :
-
Modulus of subgrade reaction
- k hn :
-
Modulus of subgrade reaction for non-liquefied soils
- K :
-
Stiffness factor
- L :
-
Length of the pile
- L s :
-
Affected distance of lateral spreading
- L x :
-
Location factor
- L 1 :
-
Thickness of the top non-liquefiable soil cover
- L 2 :
-
Thickness of the liquefiable layer
- L 3 :
-
Length of pile embedded into the bottom non-liquefiable layer
- L/D :
-
Length to diameter ratio
- M :
-
Moment factor
- M D :
-
Developed bending moment
- M T :
-
Moment applied at the pile top
- M′:
-
Non-dimensional bending moment coefficient
- M*:
-
Maximum non-dimensional bending moment coefficient
- n + 1:
-
Number of elements
- N :
-
Standard penetration test value
- N a :
-
Axial load distribution matrix
- O :
-
Applied force vector
- p :
-
Soil pressure
- P :
-
Axial load applied at the pile top
- P z :
-
Axial load variation with depth z
- Q :
-
Soil modulus to soil strength ratio
- r :
-
Non-liquefied depth factor
- R :
-
Pile flexibility factor
- s :
-
Liquefied depth factor
- sl:
-
Gradient of the surface topography
- S f :
-
Stiffness degradation parameter
- S u :
-
Un-drained strength of the soil
- t :
-
Embedded depth factor
- T :
-
Lateral soil force vector
- U :
-
Matrix for the equilibrium conditions
- V :
-
Vertical load factor
- x :
-
Distance of the location of the pile from the waterfront
- y :
-
Deflection of the pile
- y r :
-
Relative displacement of the pile and the soil
- y 1 :
-
Reference value for y r
- Y :
-
Non-dimensional deflection coefficient
- Y*:
-
Maximum non-dimensional deflection coefficient
- z :
-
Depth
- Z :
-
Non-dimensional depth coefficient
- β:
-
Axial load variation coefficient
References
Abdoun T, Dobry R (2002) Evaluation of pile foundation response to lateral spreading. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22:1051–1058
Barlett SF, Youd TL (1995) Empirical prediction of liquefaction induced lateral spread. J Geotec Eng ASCE 121(4):316–329
Basudhar PK, Mishra SK, Maheshwari P, Das SK (2002) Flexural analysis of laterally loaded piles under liquefied soil conditions, Proceedings Indian Geotechnical Conference, Geotechnical Engineering: Environmental Challenges. Allahabad, India, 435–440
Berrill JB, Christensen SA, Keenan RP, Okadas W, Pettinga JR (2001) Case study of lateral spreading forces on a piled foundation. Geotechnique 51(6):501–517
Bhattacharya S (2004) A method to evaluate the safety of the existing piled foundations against buckling in liquefiable soils. In: First international conference on urban earthquake engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 339–346
Hamada M, O’Rourke YD (1992) Case studies of liquefaction and lifeline performance during fast earthquakes, Technical report, NCEER-92–0001
Hamada M, Yasuda S, Isoyama R, Emoto K (1986) Study on liquefaction-induced permanent ground displacements, Association for the development of earthquake prediction, Tokyo, Japan
Hetenyi M (1946) Beams on elastic foundations. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich
Ishihara K (1997) Geotechnical aspects of the 1995 Kobe earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering.Terzaghi Oration, Hamburg, 2047–2073
Ishihara K, Cubrinovski M (1998) Soil–pile interaction in liquefied deposits undergoing lateral spreading. In: Maric B et al (eds) Geotechnical hazards. Balkema, 51–64
Klar A, Baker R, Frydman S (2004) Seismic soil–pile interaction in liquefiable soil. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 24:551–564
Mishra SK (1992) Analysis of laterally loaded piles under liquefied soil conditions. M. Tech thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Miyajima M, Kitaura M (1994) Experiments on force acting on underground structures in liquefaction-induced ground flow, Technical Report NCEER-94–0026, NCEER, Buffalo, NY, 445–455
O’Rourke TD, Meyersohn WD, Shiba Y, Chaudhuri D (1994) Evaluation of pile response to liquefaction-induced lateral spread, Technical Report NCEER-94–0026, NCEER, Buffalo, NY, 457–479
Shamoto Y, Zhang JM, Tokimatsu K (1998) Methods for predicting residual post-liquefaction ground settlement and lateral spreading. Soils Found 38(special issue):69–83
Tamri Y, Towhata I (2003) Seismic soil-structure interaction of cross sections of flexible underground structures subjected to soil liquefaction. Soils Found 43(2):69–87
Tokimatsu K, Oh-oka H, Satake K, ShamotoY, AsakaY (1998) Effects of lateral ground movements on failure patterns of piles in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake, ASCE, Geotecnical earthquake Engrg and soil dynamics 3rd Conf., 1175–1186
Tokimatsu K (1999) Performance of pile foundations in laterally spreading soils, Proc 2nd international conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 957–964
Yoshida N, Hamada M (1991) Damage to foundation piles and deformation pattern of ground due to liquefaction-induced permanent ground deformations, 3rd US–Japan workshop on earthquake-resistant design of lifeline facilities and countermeasures for soil liquefaction, Technical report NCEER-91–0001, NCEER, Buffalo, NY, 147–161
Zhang G, Robertson PK, Brachman RWI (2004) Estimating liquefaction induced lateral displacements using the standard penetration test or cone penetration test. J Geotec Geoenvoron Eng 130(8):861–871
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meera, R.S., Shanker, K. & Basudhar, P.K. Flexural response of piles under liquefied soil conditions. Geotech Geol Eng 25, 409–422 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-9118-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-9118-z