Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Crop production, soil carbon and nutrient balances as affected by fertilisation in a Mollisol agroecosystem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 19-year field experiment on a Mollisol agroecosystem was carried out to study the productivity of a wheat-maize-soybean rotation and the changes in soil carbon and nutrient status in response to different fertiliser applications in Northeast China. The experiment consisted of seven fertiliser treatments: (1) unfertilised control, (2) annual application of P and K fertilisers, (3) N and K fertilisers, (4) N and P fertilisers, (5) N, P and K fertilisers, (6) N, K and second level P fertilisers, and (7) N, P and second level K fertilisers. Without fertiliser, the Mollisols could support an average yield of 1.88 t ha−1 for wheat, 3.89 t ha−1 for maize and 2.12 t ha−1 for soybean, compared to yields of 3.20, 9.30 and 2.45 t ha−1 respectively for wheat, maize and soybean if the crop nutrient demands were met. At the potential yield level, the N, P and K removal by wheat are 79 kg N ha−1, 15 kg P ha−1, and 53 kg K ha−1, by maize are 207 kg N ha−1, 47 kg P ha−1, and 180 kg K ha−1, by soybean are 174 kg N ha−1, 18 kg P ha−1, and 55 kg K ha−1. Crop yield, change in soil organic carbon (SOC), and the total and available nutrient status were used to evaluate the fertility of this soil over different time periods. This study showed that a fertiliser strategy that was able to maintain yields in the short term (19 years) would not maintain the long term fertility of these soils. Although organic carbon levels did not rise to the level of virgin soil in any treatment, a combination of N, P and K fertiliser that approximated crop export was required to stabilise SOC and prevent a decline in the total store of soil nutrients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bot AJ, Nachtergaele FO, Young A, (2000) Land resource potential and constraints at regional and country levels. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, pp 38

  • Cassman KG, De Datta SK, Amarante ST, Liboon SP, Samson MI, Dizon MA (1996) Long-term comparison of the agronomic efficiency and residual benefits of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources for tropical lowland rice. Exp Agric 32:427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT, Yang H (2003) Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:315–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhang X, He H, Xie H, Yan Y, Zhu P, Ren J, Wang L (2009) Carbon and nitrogen pools in different aggregates of a Chinese Mollisol as influenced by long-term fertilization. J Soil Sedi. doi 10.1007/s11368-009-0123-8

  • China statistical yearbook (2009) Compiled by national bureau of statistics of China. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1993) Crop evolution, adaptation, and yield. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p 500

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrizzi KP, Moron A, Garcia FO (2003) Soil carbon and nitrogen organic fractions in degraded vs. non-degraded Mollisols in Argentina. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1831–1841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2009) FAOSTAT Data. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx

  • Hardarson G, Zapata F, Danso S (1984) Effect of plant genotype and nitrogen fertilizer on symbiotic nitrogen fixation by soybean cultivars. Plant Soil 82:397–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heilongjiang Statistical yearbook (1990–2008) Complied by Heilongjiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics and Survey Organization of Heilongjiang of NBS

  • Hossain MF, White SK, Elahi SF, Sultana N, Choudhury MHK, Alam QK, Rother JA, Gaunt JL (2005) The efficiency of nitrogen fertiliser for rice in Bangladeshi farmers’ fields. Field Crop Res 93:94–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt PG, Matheny TA, Wollum AGI, USDAA (1985) Rhizobium japonicum nodular occupancy, nitrogen accumulation, and yield for determinate soybean under conservation and conventional tillage. Agron J 77:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, pp 25–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Sparks DL (ed). Methods of soil analysis:chemical methods. Part 3. Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, pp 869–919

  • Lensi R, Clays-Josserand A, Jocteur Monrozier L (1995) Denitrifiers and denitrifying activity in size fractions of a Mollisol under permanent pasture and continuous cultivation. Soil Biol Biochem 27:61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Han X, Song C, Herbert SJ, Xing B (2003) Soil organic carbon dynamics in black soils of china under different agricultural management systems. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 34:973–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann K, Verburg PH, Stehfest E, Müller C (2010) The yield gap of global grain production: a spatial analysis. Agric Syst 103:316–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FSD, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Mille RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. Agronomy, vol. 9. ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin

  • Pathak H, Mohanty S, Jain N, Bhatia A (2010) Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium budgets in Indian agriculture. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 86:287–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prat PF (1967) In: Black CA (Ed). Methods of soil analysis. American Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, vol.9, pp 532–544

  • Robinson CA, Cruse RM, Ghaffarzadeh M (1996) Cropping system and nitrogen effects on Mollisol organic carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:264–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell AE, Laird DA, Parkin TB, Mallarino AP (2005) Impact of nitrogen fertilization and cropping system on carbon sequestration in midwestern Mollisols. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:413–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT User’s guide, 6.03 edition. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraiwa T, Sinclai TR, Hashikawa U (1994) Variability in nitrogen fixation activity among soybean cultivars grown under field conditions. Crop Sci 63:111–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Han X, Tang C (2007) Changes in phosphorus fractions, sorption and release in Udic Mollisols under different ecosystems. Biol Fertil Soils 44:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standford S, English L (1949) Use of flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agron J 41:446–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RL, Sheard RW, Moyer JR (1967) Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron J 59:240–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (1998) Keys to soil Taxonomy. Washington, DC

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) Estimation of Soil organic carbon by chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang E, Wang D, Huang S, Ma Y, Smith CJ, Wang L (2010) Crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency as affected by long-term fertilisation in North China Plain. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 86:105–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xing B, Liu X, Liu J, Han X (2004) Physical and chemical characteristics of a typical Mollisol in China. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 35:1829–1838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.40971152) and the Regional Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (ZD200904) for providing funding for this work and all scientists associated with National Long-term Monitoring Network of Soil Fertility for their valuable work. We also thank CSIRO-Chinese Ministry of Education joint PhD Research Fellowship Program for providing the senior author of this paper the research opportunity in CSIRO Land and Water, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaozeng Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, C., Wang, E., Han, X. et al. Crop production, soil carbon and nutrient balances as affected by fertilisation in a Mollisol agroecosystem. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 89, 363–374 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9401-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9401-5

Keywords

Navigation