Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public Perceptions of High-rise Building Emergency Evacuation Preparedness

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In light of the events of September 11, 2001, a concern in the fire safety community is that the public attitudes toward emergency evacuation procedures and preparedness may have changed and that current assumptions about occupant behavior may no longer be valid. In 2006, a survey of high-rise building occupants was conducted to explore their knowledge of high-rise building safety and emergency evacuation procedures and their attitudes and perceptions about high-rise safety and emergency evacuation procedures. Some 244 residential building occupants in Chicago, New York City and San Francisco and 228 commercial building occupants in Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, and Philadelphia were surveyed. The study revealed that the events of September 11, 2001 have heightened occupants concerns about safety in high-rise buildings. Eight in ten commercial building respondents participated in a fire drill in the last year, compared to 18% of residential building respondents. Among both survey respondents, the most frequent top-of-mind suggestion to building management to improve safety was “more fire drills.” Almost all occupants know where the fire exits are. And, keeping with conventional wisdom, most occupants believe using elevators is unsafe during a fire, however, 28% also believe that going to the roof is a possible alternative to using the stairs. These findings support the need for continued public education about emergency evacuations procedures in high-rise buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The study designed called for interviews with building owners/managers and designated Fire Marshals. However, NuStats encountered reluctance and refusal to participate in interviews by building owners and managers. The source of this reluctance cited most frequently by building owners/managers was two-fold: (1) distrust in the true purpose of the study (e.g., they would be cited for building code violations) and (2) suspicion that the study would ultimately result in increased regulation or more building codes. As a result, interviews with building owners/managers and designated Fire Marshals were excluded from the study design.

References

  1. NFPA 101 (2006) Life safety code. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)

  2. de Vries DA (2006) Elevator use for evacuation emerging issues in high-rise building egress. In: Fire protection engineering, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, July 1, 2006

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the NFPA for sponsoring this research and the guidance and reviews provided by the Fire Protection Research Foundation Technical Panelists Jason Averill, Rita Fahy, Ray Grill, Bob Minnick, Dave Parson, Jake Pauls, Milosh Puchovsky, Wes Shoemaker and Russ Tomas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mia Zmud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zmud, M. Public Perceptions of High-rise Building Emergency Evacuation Preparedness. Fire Technol 44, 329–336 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0057-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0057-5

Keywords

Navigation