Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian entropy for spatial sampling design of environmental data

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a spatial statistical methodology to design national air pollution monitoring networks with good predictive capabilities while minimizing the cost of monitoring. The underlying complexity of atmospheric processes and the urgent need to give credible assessments of environmental risk create problems requiring new statistical methodologies to meet these challenges. In this work, we present a new method of ranking various subnetworks taking both the environmental cost and the statistical information into account. A Bayesian algorithm is introduced to obtain an optimal subnetwork using an entropy framework. The final network and accuracy of the spatial predictions is heavily dependent on the underlying model of spatial correlation. Usually the simplifying assumption of stationarity, in the sense that the spatial dependency structure does not change location, is made for spatial prediction. However, it is not uncommon to find spatial data that show strong signs of nonstationary behavior. We build upon an existing approach that creates a nonstationary covariance by a mixture of a family of stationary processes, and we propose a Bayesian method of estimating the associated parameters using the technique of Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo. We apply these methods for spatial prediction and network design to ambient ozone data from a monitoring network in the eastern US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz M and Stegun IA (1964). Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bras RL and Rodriquez-Iturbe I (1976). Network design for the estimation of areal mean of rainfall events. Water Resour Res 12: 1185–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM (1979). Expected information as expected utility. Ann Stat 7: 686–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SP and Guidici P (2000). MCMC convergence assessment via two-way ANOVA. J Comput Graph Stat 9: 266–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselton WF and Zidek JV (1984). Optimal monitoring network designs. Stat Probab Lett 2: 223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Gotway CA and Grondona MO (1990). Spatial prediction from networks. Chemometrics Intell Lab Sys 7: 251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M (2001). A new high frequency kriging approach for nonstationary environmental processes. Envirometrics 12: 469–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M (2002). Modeling and prediction of nonstationary spatial processes. Stat Model 2: 281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M, Smith R (2001) A new class of nonstationary models. Tech. report at North Carolina State University, Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series #2534

  • Gelfand AE and Smith AFM (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating margnal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ (1995). Reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo computation and bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82: 711–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttorp P, Le ND, Sampson PD and Zidek JV (1993). Using entropy in the redesign of an environmental monitoring network. In: Patil, GP and Rao, CR (eds) Multivariate environmental statistics, pp 173–202. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko CW, Lee J and Queyranane M (1995). An exact algrotihm for maximum entropy sampling. Operat Res 43: 684–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley DV (1956). On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Ann Math Stat 27: 986–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Matérn B (1960) Spatial variation. Meddelanden fran Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut. (Almaenna Foerlaget, Stockholm. Second edition 91986), (vol 49, Issue 5). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Müller P (1999). Simulated-based optimal design. Bayesian Stat 6: 459–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller WG and Zimmerman DL (1999). Optimal designs for variogram estimation. Environmetrics 10: 23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nychka D and Saltzman N (1998). Design of air quality networks. In: Nychka, D, Piegorsch, W and Cox, LH (eds) Case studies in environmental statistics, Lecture Notes in Statistics number 132, pp 51–76. Apringer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil J and Fiebig DG (1984). Exploiting continuity: maximum entropy estimation of continuous distributions. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003) National air quality and emissions trends report, 2003 special studies edition. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, EPA 454/R-03-005

  • Warrick AW and Myers DE (1987). Optimization of sampling locations for variogram calculations. Water Resour Res 23: 496–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikle CK and Royle JA (1999). Space-time dynamic design of environmental monitoring networks. J Agric Biol Environ Stati 4: 489–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yfantis EA, Flatman GT and Behar JV (1987). Efficiency of kriging estimation for square, triangular, and hexagonal grids. Math Geol 19: 183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zidek J, Sun W and Le N (2000). Designing and integrating composite networks for monitoring multivariate Gaussian pollution fields. Appl Stat 49: 63–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Montserrat Fuentes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuentes, M., Chaudhuri, A. & Holland, D.M. Bayesian entropy for spatial sampling design of environmental data. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 323–340 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0017-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0017-0

Keywords

Navigation