Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of breast cancer precursors through exhaled breath

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Certain benign breast diseases are considered to be precursors of invasive breast cancer. Currently available techniques for diagnosing benign breast conditions lack accuracy. The purpose of this study was to deliver a proof-of-concept for a novel method that is based on breath testing to identify breast cancer precursors. Within this context, the authors explored the possibility of using exhaled alveolar breath to identify and distinguish between benign breast conditions, malignant lesions, and healthy states, using a small-scale, case-controlled, cross-sectional clinical trial. Breath samples were collected from 36 volunteers and were analyzed using a tailor-made nanoscale artificial NOSE (NA-NOSE). The NA-NOSE signals were analyzed using two independent methods: (i) principal component analysis, ANOVA and Student’s t-test and (ii) support vector machine analysis to detect statistically significant differences between the sub-populations. The NA-NOSE could distinguish between all studied test populations. Breath testing with a NA-NOSE holds future potential as a cost-effective, fast, and reliable diagnostic test for breast cancer risk factors and precursors, with possible future potential as screening method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

IDC:

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

DCIS:

Ductal carcinoma in situ

BC:

Breast cancer

NA-NOSE:

Nanoscale artificial NOSE

GC–MS:

Gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry

PCA:

Principle component analysis

SVM:

Support vector machine

References

  1. Guray M, Sahin AA (2006) Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management. Oncologist 11:435–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society (2009) Breast cancer facts and figures 2009–2010. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta

  3. Wiechmann L, Kuerer HM (2008) The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer. Cancer 112(10):2130–2142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng G, Hakim M, Broza YY, Billan S, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Kuten A, Tisch U, Haick H (2010) Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors. Br J Cancer 103:542–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Songa G, Qina T, Liua H, Xub GB, Pana YY, Xionga FX, Gua KS, Suna GP, Chena ZD (2010) Quantitative breath analysis of volatile organic compounds of lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 67:227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conzen SD, Grushko TA, Olopade OI (2008) Cancer of the breast. In: Vincent T, DeVita J, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA (eds) DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s cancer: principles & practice of oncology, vol 2, 8th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, pp 1595–1653

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vousden KH, Ryan KM (2009) p53 and metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 9(10):691–700. doi:nrc2715[pii]10.1038/nrc2715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Okunieff P, Fenton B, Chen Y (2005) Past, present, and future of oxygen in cancer research. Adv Exp Med Biol 566:213–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kneepkens CMF, Lepage G, Roy CC (1994) The potential of the hydrocarbon breath test as a measure of lipid peroxidation. Free Rad Biol Med 17(2):127–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon SM, Szidon JP, Krotoszynski BK, Gibbons RD, Oneill HJ (1985) Volatile organic-compounds in exhaled air from patients with lung-cancer. Clin Chem 31(8):1278–1282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Preti G, Labows JN, Kostelc JG, Aldinger S, Daniele R (1988) Analysis of lung air from patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and controls using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr 432:1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng G, Tisch U, Adams U, Hakim M, Shehada N, Broza YY, Billan S, Abdah-Bortnyak R, Kuten A, Haick H (2009) Diagnosing lung cancer in exhaled breath using gold nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 4(10):669–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips M, Cataneo RN, Ditkoff BA, Fisher P, Greenberg J, Gunawardena R, Kwon CS, Tietje O, Wong C (2006) Prediction of breast cancer using volatile biomarkers in the breath. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99(1):19–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips M, Cataneo RN, Saunders C, Hope P, Schmitt P, Wai J (2010) Volatile biomarkers in the breath of women with breast cancer. J Breath Res 4:026003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krkosova Z, Kubinec R, Sojak L, Amann A (2008) Temperature-programmed gas chromatography linear retention indices of all C4–C30 monomethylalkanes on methylsilicone OV-1 stationary phase. J Chromatogr A 1179(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Filipiak W, Sponring A, Filipiak A, Ager C, Schubert J, Miekisch W, Amann A, Troppmair J (2010) TD–GC–MS analysis of volatile metabolites of human lung cancer and normal cells in vitro. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(1):182–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bajtarevic A, Ager C, Pienz M, Klieber M, Schwarz K, Ligor M, Ligor T, Filipiak W, Denz H, Fiegl M, Hilbe W, Weiss W, Lukas P, Jamnig H, Hackl M, Haidenberger A, Buszewski B, Miekisch W, Schubert J, Amann A (2009) Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath. BMC Cancer 9:348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng G, Trock E, Haick H (2008) Detecting simulated patterns of lung cancer biomarkers by random network of single-walled carbon nanotubes coated with nonpolymeric organic materials. Nano Lett 8(11):3631–3635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dovgolevsky E, Haick H (2008) Direct observation of the transition point between quasi-spherical and cubic nanoparticles in two-step seed-mediated growth method. Small 4(11):2059–2066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dovgolevsky E, Tisch U, Haick H (2009) Chemically sensitive resistors based on monolayer-capped cubic nanoparticles: towards configurable nanoporous sensors. Small 5(10):1158–1161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roeck F, Barsan N, Weimar U (2008) Electronic nose: current status and future trends. Chem Rev 108(2):705–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 30(3):273–297

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the Marie Curie Excellence Grant of the European Commission’s FP6 program (H.H.), the Alfred Mann Institute (H.H.), and the Friends for an Earlier Breast Cancer Test (H.H.). The authors acknowledge Ms. Rana Bassal and Ms. Nisreen Shehada (Technion-IIT) for their assistance in breath collection. H.H. is a Knight of the Order of Academic Palms and holds the Horev Chair for Leaders in Science and Technology.

Conflicts of interest

All co-authors declare no competing interests related to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossam Haick.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 137 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shuster, G., Gallimidi, Z., Reiss, A.H. et al. Classification of breast cancer precursors through exhaled breath. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126, 791–796 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1317-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1317-x

Keywords

Navigation