Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and economic efficiency of a multimedia, multimodal physical activity program for women undergoing adjuvant therapy following surgery for breast cancer. We conducted a randomized trial with concurrent incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and blinded baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up assessments amongst women undergoing adjuvant therapy following surgery for breast cancer (n = 89). The intervention was a multimedia, multimodal exercise program comprising strength, balance and endurance training elements. The control was sham flexibility and relaxation program delivered using similar materials. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (EQ-5D & VAS, EORTC C30, BR23). Economic outcomes included direct health care costs and productivity gains and losses. Participants in the intervention group demonstrated greater improvement in health-related quality of life between baseline and the 3-month assessment [mean (sd) EQ-5D VAS (0–100) baseline: 72.6 (15.6), 3 month: 80.6 (11.6)] when compared to control group participants [baseline: 77.5 (13.5), 3 month: 74.1 (20.6), P = 0.006] and also improved more in terms of physical function [mean (sd) EORTC C30 physical function scale intervention (0–100) baseline: 84.9 (14.8), 3 month: 86.9 (10.7), control baseline: 91.3 (9.6), 3 month: 86.7 (14.9), P = 0.02]. These improvements were not sustained beyond this point. Upper limb volumes were also lower amongst intervention group participants. However, there was low probability that the intervention would be both less costly and more effective than the control condition (range probability = 0.05–50.02% depending on approach). Provision of multimodal exercise programs will improve the short-term health of women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer but are of questionable economic efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Markes M, Brockow T, Resch K (2006) Exercises for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4: Art. No.: CD005001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005001.pub2
Courneya K, Segal R, Mackey J, Gelmon K, Reid R, Friedenreich C, Ladha A, Proulx C, Vallance J, Lane K, Yasui Y, McKenzie D (2007) Effects of aerobic and resistance exercise in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 25:4396–4404
Schmitz K, Ahmed R, Troxel A, Cheville A, Smith R, Lewis-Grant L, Bryan C, Williams-Smith C, Green Q (2009) Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. New Engl J Med 361:664–673
Choy NL, Brauer S, Nitz J (2003) Changes in postural stability in women aged 20 to 80 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:525–530
Sugden EM, Rezvani M, Harrison JM, Hughes LK (1998) Shoulder movement after the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 10:173–181
Mock V, Frangakis C, Davidson NE, Ropka ME, Pickett M, Poniatowski B, Stewart KJ, Cameron L, Zawacki K, Podewils LJ, Cohen G, McCorkle R (2004) Exercise manages fatigue during breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncol 14:464–477
Pickett M, Mock V, Ropka ME, Cameron L, Coleman M, Podewils L (2002) Adherence to moderate-intensity exercise during breast cancer therapy. Cancer Pract 10:284–292
Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343
Conner-Spady B, Cumming C, Nabholtz J, Jacobs P, Stewart D (2001) Responsiveness of the EuroQol in breast cancer patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy. Qual Life Res 10:479–486
Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez N, Filiberti A, Fletchner H, Fleishman S, de Haes J, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Rasavi D, Rofe P, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F (1993) The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376
Montazeri A, Harirchi I, Vahdani M, Khaleghi F, Jarvandi S, Ebrahimi M, Haji-Mahmoodi M (2000) The EORTC breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 9:177–184
Haines TP, Sinnamon P (2007) Early arm swelling after breast surgery: changes on both sides. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101:105–112
Tanita Corporation. Innerscan Model BC 543. http://www.tanita.com. Last accessed 2nd May 2008
Smets E, Garssen B, Bonke B, Haes J (1995) The multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 39:315–325
Duncan P, Studenski S, Chandler J, Prescott B (1992) Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 47:93–98
Hill K, Bernhardt J, McGann A, Maltese D, Berkovits D (1996) A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiother Can 48:257–262
Guyatt G, Sullivan M, Thompson P, Fallen E, Pugsley S, Taylor D, Berman L (1985) The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 132:919–923
World Health Organisation. Definition of a fall. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/other_injury/falls/en/index.html. Last accessed 1st Jan 2010
van Roijen L, Essink-Bot ML, Koopmanschap MA, Bonsel G, Rutten FF (1996) Labor and health status in economic evaluation of health care. The Health and Labor Questionnaire. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 12:405–415
McPhail S, Lane P, Russell T, Brauer SG, Urry S, Jasiewicz J, Condie P, Haines T (2009) Telephone reliability of the Frenchay Activity Index and EQ-5D amongst older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:48
Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108
Fayers PM, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A (2001) On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Brussels, EORTC
Laird N, Ware J (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974
Parkin D, Devlin N (2006) Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis? Health Econ 15:653–664
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. AR-DRG data cubes. http://www.aihw.gov.au/hospitals/datacubes/datacube_ardrg.cfm. Last accessed 16th June 2008
Fenwick E, O’Brien B, Briggs A (2004) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves—facts, fallacies and frequently asked questions. Health Econ 13:405–415
Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D (2007) Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:70
Segal R, Evans W, Johnson D, Smith J, Colletta S, Gayton J, Woodard S, Wells G, Reid R (2001) Structured exercise improves physical functioning in women with stages I and II breast cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 19:657–665
Campbell A, Mutrie N, White F, McGuire F, Kearney N (2005) A pilot study of a supervised group exercise programme as a rehabilitation treatment for women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs 9:56–63
James M, Kolt G, McConville J, Bate P (1998) The effects of a Feldenkrais program and relaxation procedures on hamstring length. Aust J Physiother 44:49–54
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by a project grant from the Princess Alexandra Hospital Cancer Collaborative Group.
Associate Professor Terry P Haines is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Award (606732).
The authors wish to acknowledge Paul Lane and Nampech Goeldnar for their contribution to data collection for this project.
Conflicts of interest
No conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haines, T.P., Sinnamon, P., Wetzig, N.G. et al. Multimodal exercise improves quality of life of women being treated for breast cancer, but at what cost? Randomized trial with economic evaluation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124, 163–175 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1126-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1126-2