Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholder analysis of river restoration activity for eight years in a river channel

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From 1998 to 2003, stakeholder analysis was conducted to investigate an origin and continuity of river restoration project by local stakeholders. The project includes introduction of catch-and-release regulation of trout and remaking Sabo dam to slit Sabo dam in a river channel. In the stakeholder analysis, four attributes of stakeholder; such as power, legitimacy, urgency, and position were demonstrated. Then Stakeholder Typology was created to overview stakeholders’ characteristic. After that, how the past 8 years project was promoted and how future project should be promoted was described. Network structure was built to arrange these descriptions. Each stakeholder had one or more attributes of power, legitimacy and urgency. Definitive stakeholders, who have three attributes, played a major role to assure the project. Definitive stakeholders were local residents and they first introduced C&R regulation in a local river channel to increase trout population. After that, a definitive stakeholder petitioned to remake Sabo dam to slit Sabo dam to reconnect river continuity and enhance river ecosystem. However, future continuity of the project may be threatened by lack of power of definitive stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FFC:

Freshwater Fishery Cooperative

SA:

Stakeholder Analysis

References

  • Brenner S.N. 1993. The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: some propositions and a model. In: Pasquero J. and Collins D. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. San Diego pp. 205–210.

  • S.N. Brenner (1995) Stakeholder theory of the firm: its consistency with current management techniques J. Näsi (Eds) Understanding Stakeholder Thinking LSR-Julkaisut Oy Helsinki 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Brugha Z. Varvasovszky (2000) ArticleTitleStakeholder analysis: a review Health Policy Plann. 15 IssueID3 239–246 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fnslyhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/heapol/15.3.239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier J. 2001. Stakeholder Analysis and Natural Resource Management [On line], Available at http://www.arleton.ca/~jchevali/STAKE2.html.

  • R.A. Dahl (1957) ArticleTitleThe concept of power Behavioral Sci. 2 201–215 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bs.3830020303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick B. 1997. Stakeholder analysis [On line], Available at http://www.scu.edu.au/scholls/gcm/ar/arp/stake.html.

  • R.E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Freeman (1994) ArticleTitleThe politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions Bus. Ethics Quart. 4 409–421

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Freeman D.L. Reed (1983) ArticleTitleStockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance Calif. Manage. Rev. 25 IssueID3 88–106

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Harrison J. Burgess (2000) ArticleTitleValuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches Biodivers. Conserv. 9 1115–1130 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008930922198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatai I. 1999. Fertile sea by caring mind. Forest Sci. 26: 32–35, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • I.M. Jawahar G.L. Mclaughlin (2001) ArticleTitleToward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach Acad. Manage. Rev. 26 IssueID3 397–414

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kujala (2001) ArticleTitleAnalysing moral issues in stakeholder relations Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 10 IssueID3 233–247 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Mitchell B.R. Agle D.J. Wood (1997) ArticleTitleToward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 IssueID4 853–886 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Ravnborg M.P. Buerrero (1997) ArticleTitleStakeholder analysis in natural resource management ILEIA Newslett. 13 IssueID1 12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Reimchen (2001) ArticleTitleSalmon nutrients, nitrogen isotopes and coastal forests Ecoforestry 16 IssueID3 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • G.G. Savage T.H. Nix C.J. Whitehead J.D. Blair (1991) ArticleTitleStrategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders Acad. Manage. Exec. 5 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Scott (1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Suchman (1995) ArticleTitleManaging legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 571–610 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Starik (1994) ArticleTitleEssay by Mark Starik, pp. 89–95 of the Toronto conference: reflections on stakeholder theory Bus. Soc. 33 82–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts Telecommunications. 2002. Population distribution by prefecture, sex and ages (in Japanese).

  • Tanaka T. 1998. Fish community in stream. In: Ezaki Y. and Tanaka T. (eds), Mizubekankyono Hozen (convervation on riparian zone). Asakura Shoten, Tokyopp.177–194, (in Japanese).

  • Z. Varvasovszky R. Brugha (2000) ArticleTitleHow to do (or not to do)… a stakeholder analysis Health Policy Plann. 15 338–345 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FnslygsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/heapol/15.3.338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S. Wasserman K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaginuma T. 1993. Propagate fish resource by planting tree. Ienohikari Association, 254 pp, (in Japanese).

  • Yoshii A., Okamura T., Funaki A. and Yanai S. 2000. Fundamental issue for the management of riparian zone and riparian forest, management of riparian zone. In: Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering (ed.), pp. 64–102, Kokonshoin (in Japanese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Tanaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, A. Stakeholder analysis of river restoration activity for eight years in a river channel. Biodivers Conserv 15, 2787–2811 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2093-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2093-5

Navigation