Abstract
From 1998 to 2003, stakeholder analysis was conducted to investigate an origin and continuity of river restoration project by local stakeholders. The project includes introduction of catch-and-release regulation of trout and remaking Sabo dam to slit Sabo dam in a river channel. In the stakeholder analysis, four attributes of stakeholder; such as power, legitimacy, urgency, and position were demonstrated. Then Stakeholder Typology was created to overview stakeholders’ characteristic. After that, how the past 8 years project was promoted and how future project should be promoted was described. Network structure was built to arrange these descriptions. Each stakeholder had one or more attributes of power, legitimacy and urgency. Definitive stakeholders, who have three attributes, played a major role to assure the project. Definitive stakeholders were local residents and they first introduced C&R regulation in a local river channel to increase trout population. After that, a definitive stakeholder petitioned to remake Sabo dam to slit Sabo dam to reconnect river continuity and enhance river ecosystem. However, future continuity of the project may be threatened by lack of power of definitive stakeholders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- FFC:
-
Freshwater Fishery Cooperative
- SA:
-
Stakeholder Analysis
References
Brenner S.N. 1993. The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: some propositions and a model. In: Pasquero J. and Collins D. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. San Diego pp. 205–210.
S.N. Brenner (1995) Stakeholder theory of the firm: its consistency with current management techniques J. Näsi (Eds) Understanding Stakeholder Thinking LSR-Julkaisut Oy Helsinki 75–96
R. Brugha Z. Varvasovszky (2000) ArticleTitleStakeholder analysis: a review Health Policy Plann. 15 IssueID3 239–246 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fnslyhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/heapol/15.3.239
Chevalier J. 2001. Stakeholder Analysis and Natural Resource Management [On line], Available at http://www.arleton.ca/~jchevali/STAKE2.html.
R.A. Dahl (1957) ArticleTitleThe concept of power Behavioral Sci. 2 201–215 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bs.3830020303
Dick B. 1997. Stakeholder analysis [On line], Available at http://www.scu.edu.au/scholls/gcm/ar/arp/stake.html.
R.E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston
R.E. Freeman (1994) ArticleTitleThe politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions Bus. Ethics Quart. 4 409–421
R.E. Freeman D.L. Reed (1983) ArticleTitleStockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance Calif. Manage. Rev. 25 IssueID3 88–106
C. Harrison J. Burgess (2000) ArticleTitleValuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches Biodivers. Conserv. 9 1115–1130 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008930922198
Hatai I. 1999. Fertile sea by caring mind. Forest Sci. 26: 32–35, (in Japanese).
I.M. Jawahar G.L. Mclaughlin (2001) ArticleTitleToward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach Acad. Manage. Rev. 26 IssueID3 397–414
J. Kujala (2001) ArticleTitleAnalysing moral issues in stakeholder relations Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 10 IssueID3 233–247 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00237
R.K. Mitchell B.R. Agle D.J. Wood (1997) ArticleTitleToward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 IssueID4 853–886 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259247
H.M. Ravnborg M.P. Buerrero (1997) ArticleTitleStakeholder analysis in natural resource management ILEIA Newslett. 13 IssueID1 12–15
T. Reimchen (2001) ArticleTitleSalmon nutrients, nitrogen isotopes and coastal forests Ecoforestry 16 IssueID3 13–16
G.G. Savage T.H. Nix C.J. Whitehead J.D. Blair (1991) ArticleTitleStrategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders Acad. Manage. Exec. 5 61–75
J. Scott (1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
M.C. Suchman (1995) ArticleTitleManaging legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 571–610 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258788
M. Starik (1994) ArticleTitleEssay by Mark Starik, pp. 89–95 of the Toronto conference: reflections on stakeholder theory Bus. Soc. 33 82–131
Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts Telecommunications. 2002. Population distribution by prefecture, sex and ages (in Japanese).
Tanaka T. 1998. Fish community in stream. In: Ezaki Y. and Tanaka T. (eds), Mizubekankyono Hozen (convervation on riparian zone). Asakura Shoten, Tokyopp.177–194, (in Japanese).
Z. Varvasovszky R. Brugha (2000) ArticleTitleHow to do (or not to do)… a stakeholder analysis Health Policy Plann. 15 338–345 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FnslygsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/heapol/15.3.338
S. Wasserman K. Faust (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications Cambridge University Press New York
Yaginuma T. 1993. Propagate fish resource by planting tree. Ienohikari Association, 254 pp, (in Japanese).
Yoshii A., Okamura T., Funaki A. and Yanai S. 2000. Fundamental issue for the management of riparian zone and riparian forest, management of riparian zone. In: Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering (ed.), pp. 64–102, Kokonshoin (in Japanese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tanaka, A. Stakeholder analysis of river restoration activity for eight years in a river channel. Biodivers Conserv 15, 2787–2811 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2093-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2093-5