Abstract
Bovine nasal septum (BNS) is a source of non-load bearing hyaline cartilage. Little information is available on its mechanical and biological properties. The aim of this work was to assess the characteristics of BNS cartilage and investigate its behavior in in vitro mechanobiological experiments. Mechanical tests, biochemical assays, and microscopic assessment were performed for tissue characterization. Compressions tests showed that the tissue is viscoelastic, although values of elastic moduli differ from the ones of other cartilaginous tissues. Water content was 78 ± 1.4%; glycosaminoglycans and collagen contents—measured by spectrophotometric assay and hydroxyproline assay—were 39 ± 5% and 25 ± 2.5% of dry weight, respectively. Goldner’s Trichrome staining and transmission electron microscopy proved isotropic cells distribution and results of earlier cell division. Furthermore, gene expression was measured after uniaxial compression, showing variations depending on compression time as well as trends depending on equilibration time. In conclusion, BNS has been characterized at several levels, revealing that bovine nasal tissue is regionally homogeneous. Results suggest that, under certain conditions, BNS could be used to perform in vitro cartilage loading experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, K. D., and K. A. Athanasiou. Viscoelastic characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression. J. Biomech. 39:312–322, 2006.
Anderson, H. C., and S. W. Sajdera. The fine structure of bovine nasal cartilage. Extraction as a technique to study proteoglycans and collagen in cartilage matrix. J. Cell Biol. 49:650–663, 1971.
Anderst, W. J., and S. Tashman. The association between velocity of the center of closest proximity on subchondral bones and osteoarthritis progression. J. Orthop. Res. Off. Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 27:71–77, 2009.
Archer, C. W., and P. Francis-West. The chondrocyte. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 35:401–404, 2003.
Bansal, P. N., N. S. Joshi, V. Entezari, M. W. Grinstaff, and B. D. Snyder. Contrast enhanced computed tomography can predict the glycosaminoglycan content and biomechanical properties of articular cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. OARS Osteoarthr. Res. Soc. 18:184–191, 2010.
Barbosa, I., S. Garcia, V. Barbier-Chassefière, J.-P. Caruelle, I. Martelly, and D. Papy-García. Improved and simple micro assay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans quantification in biological extracts and its use in skin and muscle tissue studies. Glycobiology 13:647–653, 2003.
Bougault, C., A. Paumier, E. Aubert-Foucher, and F. Mallein-Gerin. Molecular analysis of chondrocytes cultured in agarose in response to dynamic compression. BMC Biotechnol. 8:71, 2008.
Bruehlmann, S. B., P. A. Hulme, and N. A. Duncan. In situ intercellular mechanics of the bovine outer annulus fibrosus subjected to biaxial strains. J. Biomech. 37:223–231, 2004.
Buckwalter, J. A., and H. J. Mankin. Articular cartilage: tissue design and chondrocyte-matrix interactions. Instr. Course Lect. 47:477–486, 1998.
Buckwalter, J. A., H. J. Mankin, and A. J. Grodzinsky. Articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Instr. Course Lect. 54:465–480, 2005.
Bursać, P. M., T. W. Obitz, S. R. Eisenberg, and D. Stamenović. Confined and unconfined stress relaxation of cartilage: appropriateness of a transversely isotropic analysis. J. Biomech. 32:1125–1130, 1999.
Buschmann, M. D., Y. A. Gluzband, A. J. Grodzinsky, and E. B. Hunziker. Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. J. Cell Sci. 108(Pt 4):1497–1508, 1995.
Butler, D. L., S. A. Goldstein, and F. Guilak. Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:570–575, 2000.
Caligaris, M., and G. A. Ateshian. Effects of sustained interstitial fluid pressurization under migrating contact area, and boundary lubrication by synovial fluid, on cartilage friction. Osteoarthr. Cartil. OARS Osteoarthr. Res. Soc. 16:1220–1227, 2008.
Colombo, V., M. Cadová, and L. M. Gallo. Mechanical behavior of bovine nasal cartilage under static and dynamic loading. J. Biomech. 46:2137–2144, 2013.
Colombo, V., M. R. Correro, R. Riener, F. E. Weber, and L. M. Gallo. Design, construction and validation of a computer controlled system for functional loading of soft tissue. Med. Eng. Phys. 33:677–683, 2011.
Correro-Shahgaldian, M. R., V. Colombo, N. D. Spencer, F. E. Weber, T. Imfeld, and L. M. Gallo. Coupling plowing of cartilage explants with gene expression in models for synovial joints. J. Biomech. 44:2472–2476, 2011.
Correro-Shahgaldian, M. R., C. Ghayor, N. D. Spencer, F. E. Weber, and L. M. Gallo. A model system of the dynamic loading occurring in synovial joints: the biological effect of plowing on pristine cartilage. Cells Tissues Organs 199:364–372, 2014.
Davidson, R. K., J. G. Waters, L. Kevorkian, C. Darrah, A. Cooper, S. T. Donell, and I. M. Clark. Expression profiling of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in synovium and cartilage. Arthritis Res. Ther. 8:R124, 2006.
del Pozo, R., E. Tanaka, M. Tanaka, M. Okazaki, and K. Tanne. The regional difference of viscoelastic property of bovine temporomandibular joint disc in compressive stress-relaxation. Med. Eng. Phys. 24:165–171, 2002.
Detamore, M. S., and K. A. Athanasiou. Structure and function of the temporomandibular joint disc: implications for tissue engineering. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 61:494–506, 2003.
DiSilvestro, M. R., Q. Zhu, and J. K. Suh. Biphasic poroviscoelastic simulation of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage: II–Effect of variable strain rates. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:198–200, 2001.
El-Ayoubi, R., C. DeGrandpré, R. DiRaddo, A.-M. Yousefi, and P. Lavigne. Design and dynamic culture of 3D-scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Appl. 25:429–444, 2011.
Fitzgerald, J. B., M. Jin, D. Dean, D. J. Wood, M. H. Zheng, and A. J. Grodzinsky. Mechanical compression of cartilage explants induces multiple time-dependent gene expression patterns and involves intracellular calcium and cyclic AMP. J. Biol. Chem. 279:19502–19511, 2004.
Fitzgerald, J. B., M. Jin, and A. J. Grodzinsky. Shear and compression differentially regulate clusters of functionally related temporal transcription patterns in cartilage tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 281:24095–24103, 2006.
Flam, E. The tensile and flexural properties of bovine nasal cartilage. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 8:277–282, 1974.
Fontenot, M. G. Viscoelastic properties of human TMJ discs and disc replacement materials. J. Dent. Res. 64:163, 1985.
Fung, Y. C. First Course in Continuum Mechanics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, p. 311, 1993.
Gallo, L. M., L. R. Iwasaki, Y. M. Gonzalez, H. Liu, D. B. Marx, and J. C. Nickel. Diagnostic group differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 18(Suppl 1):164–169, 2015.
Gallo, L. M., J. C. Nickel, L. R. Iwasaki, and S. Palla. Stress-field translation in the healthy human temporomandibular joint. J. Dent. Res. 79:1740–1746, 2000.
Huang, A. H., B. M. Baker, G. A. Ateshian, and R. L. Mauck. Sliding contact loading enhances the tensile properties of mesenchymal stem cell-seeded hydrogels. Eur. Cell. Mater. 24:29–45, 2012.
Hung, C. T., R. L. Mauck, C. C. B. Wang, E. G. Lima, and G. A. Ateshian. A paradigm for functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage via applied physiologic deformational loading. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32:35–49, 2004.
Hunziker, E. B., W. Herrmann, and R. K. Schenk. Improved cartilage fixation by ruthenium hexammine trichloride (RHT). A prerequisite for morphometry in growth cartilage. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 81:1–12, 1982.
Ignat’eva, N. Y., E. N. Sobol, S. V. Averkiev, V. V. Lunin, T. E. Grokhovskaya, V. N. Bagratashvili, and E. S. Yantsen. Thermal stability of collagen II in cartilage. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 395:96–98, 2004.
Johannessen, W., and D. M. Elliott. Effects of degeneration on the biphasic material properties of human nucleus pulposus in confined compression. Spine 30:E724–729, 2005.
Jurvelin, J. S., M. D. Buschmann, and E. B. Hunziker. Optical and mechanical determination of Poisson’s ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 30:235–241, 1997.
Jurvelin, J. S., M. D. Buschmann, and E. B. Hunziker. Mechanical anisotropy of the human knee articular cartilage in compression. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 217:215–219, 2003.
Kelly, T.-A. N., K. W. Ng, C. C.-B. Wang, G. A. Ateshian, and C. T. Hung. Spatial and temporal development of chondrocyte-seeded agarose constructs in free-swelling and dynamically loaded cultures. J. Biomech. 39:1489–1497, 2006.
Kempson, G. E., H. Muir, S. A. Swanson, and M. A. Freeman. Correlations between stiffness and the chemical constituents of cartilage on the human femoral head. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 215:70–77, 1970.
Kim, K.-W., M. E. Wong, J. F. Helfrick, J. B. Thomas, and K. A. Athanasiou. Biomechanical tissue characterization of the superior joint space of the porcine temporomandibular joint. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31:924–930, 2003.
Kock, L. M., A. Ravetto, C. C. van Donkelaar, J. Foolen, P. J. Emans, and K. Ito. Tuning the differentiation of periosteum-derived cartilage using biochemical and mechanical stimulations. Osteoarthr. Cartil. OARS Osteoarthr. Res. Soc. 18:1528–1535, 2010.
Korhonen, R. K., M. S. Laasanen, J. Töyräs, J. Rieppo, J. Hirvonen, H. J. Helminen, and J. S. Jurvelin. Comparison of the equilibrium response of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, confined compression and indentation. J. Biomech. 35:903–909, 2002.
Kuo, J., L. Zhang, T. Bacro, and H. Yao. The region-dependent biphasic viscoelastic properties of human temporomandibular joint discs under confined compression. J. Biomech. 43:1316–1321, 2010.
Lee, D. A., M. M. Knight, J. F. Bolton, B. D. Idowu, M. V. Kayser, and D. L. Bader. Chondrocyte deformation within compressed agarose constructs at the cellular and sub-cellular levels. J. Biomech. 33:81–95, 2000.
Lin, P. M., C.-T. C. Chen, and P. A. Torzilli. Increased stromelysin-1 (MMP-3), proteoglycan degradation (3B3- and 7D4) and collagen damage in cyclically load-injured articular cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. OARS Osteoarthr. Res. Soc. 12:485–496, 2004.
Livak, K. J., and T. D. Schmittgen. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods San Diego Calif. 25:402–408, 2001.
Makris, E. A., P. Hadidi, and K. A. Athanasiou. The knee meniscus: structure–function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials 32:7411–7431, 2011.
Matthews, B. F. Composition of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis; changes in collagen/chondroitin-sulphate ratio. Br. Med. J. 2:660–661, 1953.
Mow, V. C., S. C. Kuei, W. M. Lai, and C. G. Armstrong. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. J. Biomech. Eng. 102:73–84, 1980.
Nesic, D., R. Whiteside, M. Brittberg, D. Wendt, I. Martin, and P. Mainil-Varlet. Cartilage tissue engineering for degenerative joint disease. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58:300–322, 2006.
Otsuki, S., D. C. Brinson, L. Creighton, M. Kinoshita, R. L. Sah, D. D’Lima, and M. Lotz. The effect of glycosaminoglycan loss on chondrocyte viability: a study on porcine cartilage explants. Arthritis Rheum. 58:1076–1085, 2008.
Parsons, J. R., and J. Black. The viscoelastic shear behavior of normal rabbit articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 10:21–29, 1977.
Pastoureau, P., and A. Chomel. Methods for cartilage and subchondral bone histomorphometry. Methods Mol. Med. 101:79–91, 2004.
Périn, J. P., F. Bonnet, and P. Jollès. Comparative studies on human and bovine nasal cartilage proteoglycan complex components. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 21:71–82, 1978.
Reddy, G. K., and C. S. Enwemeka. A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues. Clin. Biochem. 29:225–229, 1996.
Reiter, D. A., P.-C. Lin, K. W. Fishbein, and R. G. Spencer. Multicomponent T2 relaxation analysis in cartilage. Magn. Reson. Med. 61:803–809, 2009.
Roughley, P. J. The structure and function of cartilage proteoglycans. Eur. Cell. Mater. 12:92–101, 2006.
Schätti, O. R., M. Marková, P. A. Torzilli, and L. M. Gallo. Mechanical loading of cartilage explants with compression and sliding motion modulates gene expression of lubricin and catabolic enzymes. Cartilage 6:185–193, 2015.
Stoddart, M. J., L. Ettinger, and H. J. Häuselmann. Enhanced matrix synthesis in de novo, scaffold free cartilage-like tissue subjected to compression and shear. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 95:1043–1051, 2006.
Sweet, M. B., E. J. Thonar, and A. R. Immelman. Regional distribution of water and glycosaminoglycan in immature articular cartilage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 500:173–186, 1977.
Sweigart, M. A., and K. A. Athanasiou. Biomechanical characteristics of the normal medial and lateral porcine knee menisci. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 219:53–62, 2005.
Tanaka, E., M. Hirose, E. Yamano, D. A. Dalla-Bona, R. Fujita, M. Tanaka, T. van Eijden, and K. Tanne. Age-associated changes in viscoelastic properties of the bovine temporomandibular joint disc. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 114:70–73, 2006.
Tanaka, E., M. Tanaka, Y. Miyawaki, and K. Tanne. Viscoelastic properties of canine temporomandibular joint disc in compressive load-relaxation. Arch. Oral Biol. 44:1021–1026, 1999.
Torzilli, P. A., M. Bhargava, and C. T. Chen. Mechanical loading of articular cartilage reduces IL-1-induced enzyme expression. Cartilage 2:364–373, 2011.
Torzilli, P. A., R. Grigiene, C. Huang, S. M. Friedman, S. B. Doty, A. L. Boskey, and G. Lust. Characterization of cartilage metabolic response to static and dynamic stress using a mechanical explant test system. J. Biomech. 30:1–9, 1997.
Venn, M., and A. Maroudas. Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. I. Chemical composition. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 36:121–129, 1977.
Woodfield, T. B. F., J. Malda, J. de Wijn, F. Péters, J. Riesle, and C. A. van Blitterswijk. Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 25:4149–4161, 2004.
Xia, Y., S. Zheng, M. Szarko, and J. Lee. Anisotropic properties of bovine nasal cartilage. Microsc. Res. Tech. 75:300–306, 2012.
Yang, S., K. F. Leong, Z. Du, and C. K. Chua. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 7:679–689, 2001.
Zheng, S., and Y. Xia. Effect of phosphate electrolyte buffer on the dynamics of water in tendon and cartilage. NMR Biomed. 22:158–164, 2009.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. Stefan Erni for his technical help. The study was supported by Grant No. 325200-110067 from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, Switzerland.
Conflict of interest
The authors certify that the research described in the manuscript is free of conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Michael Detamore oversaw the review of this article.
Appendix
Appendix
Mechanical Model of the Tissue
A linear solid model (Kelvin model) was chosen to characterize the tissue. This model is a combination of a linear spring in parallel with a series of a linear spring and a dashpot with a step response such as:
where the stress σ(t) and the strain ε are related through the relaxed elastic modulus E R and the time constants τ σ and τ ε . The instantaneous elastic modulus E 0 can be written as:
Quantification of GAG
The method used was modified from the literature.6 We incubated 100 μL of diluted sample aliquots (papain digested cartilage) with 1 mL of DMMB solution (16 mg/L DMMB in 0.2 M GuHCl, 1 g/L sodium formate and 1 mL/L formic acid) and mixed continuously for 30 min in order to promote the formation of the GAG-DMMB complex. After centrifugation at 12,000 g for 10 min, the precipitated complex was resuspended in 1 mL water and again centrifuged as before, in order to remove any dye excess. The complex was finally dissociated by adding 800 μL of decomplexation solution (50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.8, containing 10% n-propanol and 4 M GuHCl). The absorbance of 200 μL solution was read at 656 nm using a spectrophotometer plate reader (Synergy HT multi-Mode Microplate Reader, BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski VT, USA). GAG concentrations were calculated on the basis of the Chondroitin-sulphate-A standard curve.
Quantification of Collagen
Collagen content was quantified by means of a hydroxyproline assay with some modifications.55 100 μL of diluted papain digested cartilage as well as 100 μL of standard hydroxyproline (Hyp) solution (2–40 μg/mL) were mixed with 100 μL of 4 N sodium hydroxide (1:1 v/v), gently mixed and hydrolyzed by autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 min. Autoclaved samples (100 μL) as well as standard solution (100 μL) were mixed with 425 μL of chloramine-T solution (0.056 M chloramine-T in 50% n-propanol) and incubated at room temperature for 25 min. Then, 475 µL of Ehrlich’s solution (1 M p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in n-propanol/perchloric acid (2:1 v/v)) were added to the oxidized samples or to the standard solution and incubated at 64 °C for 20 min. Absorbance was read at 550 nm in a plate reader and the amount of Hyp in the samples was determined by comparison with a Hyp standard curve. Thereafter, since Hyp represents approximately 14.4% of the aminoacidic composition of collagen, a factor of 6.94 was applied to calculate the total collagen content from the measured Hyp quantity.
RNA Extraction
The methods used were described in the literature.19 Finely sliced cartilage sub-explants (≈50 mg) were placed in Eppendorf tubes and homogenized twice for 1 min in 800 μL TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad CA, USA). After 5 min equilibration at room temperature, 200 μL of chloroform were added and the tubes were vigorously shaken, mixed and incubated for 2 min at room temperature. Following centrifugation at 9500×g for 30 min at 4 °C, the obtained aqueous phases were recovered, extracted with 200 μL of chloroform and treated as previously described. The recovered supernatants were transferred into 2 mL tubes, gently mixed with 500 μL of isopropanol, incubated for 10 min at room temperature and consecutively centrifuged at 9500×g for 40 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were discarded and the pellets resuspended in 900 μL of lysis buffer (RNeasy Mini Kit®; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) supplemented with 90 μL β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis MO, USA). After adding 900 μL ethanol (75%), the RNA was purified using Qiagen RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) whereas genomic DNA was digested with DNase kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Correro-Shahgaldian, M.R., Introvigne, J., Ghayor, C. et al. Properties and Mechanobiological Behavior of Bovine Nasal Septum Cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 44, 1821–1831 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1481-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1481-6