Summary
Background
Since implementation of the laparoscopic approach for removal of the gallbladder in the early 90s, a shift in numbers from open cholecystectomy (OC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been observed. Despite initial reservations, LC has become the most favoured technique in the past 3 decades. Consecutive technical improvements support this trend. Considering this development, the question regarding the relevance of OC nowadays inevitably arises.
Methods
This study represents a literature review performed in PubMed.
Results
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has evolved to be the leading technique for cholecystectomy. This technique has become well established in elective as well as in acute indications. However, concomitant to increasing numbers of performed LC, the proportion of performed OC is declining, leading to a decreasing expertise and a lack in training in OC nowadays. However, in complex situations, when the operation strategy has to be changed to maintain patient safety, conversion to OC is the most common strategy.
Conclusion
Owing to past and current developments, open cholecystectomy can hardly be assumed to be common surgical knowledge anymore. Hence, OC as bail-out strategy in cases of intraoperative difficulties must be critically evaluated. From this point of view, alternative patient management and treatment concepts should be considered to maintain patient safety.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BDI:
-
Common bile duct injury
- CVBI:
-
Combined vasculobiliary injury
- ERCP:
-
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography
- ICG:
-
Indocyanine green
- LC:
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- LSC:
-
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy
- OC:
-
Open cholecystectomy
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- RR:
-
Relative risk
References
Reynolds W Jr.. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5(1):89–94.
Gollan JL, Bulkley GB, Diehl AM, et al. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993;269(8):1018–24.
Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L.C.). Guidelines for clinical application. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(4):369–70.
Coccolini F, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:196–204.
Wakabayashi G, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):73–86.
Antoniou SA, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(46):17626–34.
Gad EH, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: 8 years experience in a tertiary center. A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;51:1–10.
Senra F, et al. Laparoscopic management of type II Mirizzi syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07316-6.
Way LW, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):460–9.
Schwab KE, et al. 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06961-1.
Yun JJ, et al. A retrospective single-center study comparing clinical outcomes of 3‑dimensional and 2‑dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019;23(4):339–43.
Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123–8. discussion 1129.
Rystedt J, Lindell G, Montgomery A. Bile duct injuries associated with 55,134 cholecystectomies: treatment and outcome from a national perspective. World J Surg. 2016;40(1):73–80.
Avgerinos C, et al. One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(3):498–503.
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101–25.
Iwashita Y, et al. What are the appropriate indicators of surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Results from a Japan-Korea-Taiwan multinational survey. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(9):533–47.
Hibi T, et al. The “right” way is not always popular: comparison of surgeons’ perceptions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis among experts from Japan, Korea and Taiwan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(1):24–32.
Warner RL, et al. A review of general surgery resident experience in common bile duct exploration in the ERCP era. Am J Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.032.
Sirinek KR, Willis R, Schwesinger WH. Who will be able to perform open biliary surgery in 2025? J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(1):110–5.
Purzner RH, et al. Safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the face of severe inflammation in the cystohepatic triangle: a retrospective review and proposed management strategy for the difficult gallbladder. Can J Surg. 2019;62(6):402–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M. Ammann and F. Längle declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ammann, M., Längle, F. The complicated gallbladder—is old-school treatment an alternative?. Eur Surg 53, 114–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00653-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00653-0