Skip to main content
Log in

The complicated gallbladder—is old-school treatment an alternative?

  • main topic
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Since implementation of the laparoscopic approach for removal of the gallbladder in the early 90s, a shift in numbers from open cholecystectomy (OC) to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been observed. Despite initial reservations, LC has become the most favoured technique in the past 3 decades. Consecutive technical improvements support this trend. Considering this development, the question regarding the relevance of OC nowadays inevitably arises.

Methods

This study represents a literature review performed in PubMed.

Results

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has evolved to be the leading technique for cholecystectomy. This technique has become well established in elective as well as in acute indications. However, concomitant to increasing numbers of performed LC, the proportion of performed OC is declining, leading to a decreasing expertise and a lack in training in OC nowadays. However, in complex situations, when the operation strategy has to be changed to maintain patient safety, conversion to OC is the most common strategy.

Conclusion

Owing to past and current developments, open cholecystectomy can hardly be assumed to be common surgical knowledge anymore. Hence, OC as bail-out strategy in cases of intraoperative difficulties must be critically evaluated. From this point of view, alternative patient management and treatment concepts should be considered to maintain patient safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BDI:

Common bile duct injury

CVBI:

Combined vasculobiliary injury

ERCP:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography

ICG:

Indocyanine green

LC:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

LSC:

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy

OC:

Open cholecystectomy

OR:

Odds ratio

RR:

Relative risk

References

  1. Reynolds W Jr.. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5(1):89–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gollan JL, Bulkley GB, Diehl AM, et al. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993;269(8):1018–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L.C.). Guidelines for clinical application. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(4):369–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coccolini F, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakabayashi G, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25(1):73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antoniou SA, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(46):17626–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gad EH, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: 8 years experience in a tertiary center. A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;51:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Senra F, et al. Laparoscopic management of type II Mirizzi syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07316-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Way LW, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):460–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwab KE, et al. 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06961-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yun JJ, et al. A retrospective single-center study comparing clinical outcomes of 3‑dimensional and 2‑dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019;23(4):339–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123–8. discussion 1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rystedt J, Lindell G, Montgomery A. Bile duct injuries associated with 55,134 cholecystectomies: treatment and outcome from a national perspective. World J Surg. 2016;40(1):73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avgerinos C, et al. One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(3):498–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):101–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iwashita Y, et al. What are the appropriate indicators of surgical difficulty during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Results from a Japan-Korea-Taiwan multinational survey. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(9):533–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hibi T, et al. The “right” way is not always popular: comparison of surgeons’ perceptions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis among experts from Japan, Korea and Taiwan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(1):24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Warner RL, et al. A review of general surgery resident experience in common bile duct exploration in the ERCP era. Am J Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sirinek KR, Willis R, Schwesinger WH. Who will be able to perform open biliary surgery in 2025? J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(1):110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Purzner RH, et al. Safe laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the face of severe inflammation in the cystohepatic triangle: a retrospective review and proposed management strategy for the difficult gallbladder. Can J Surg. 2019;62(6):402–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Längle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Ammann and F. Längle declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ammann, M., Längle, F. The complicated gallbladder—is old-school treatment an alternative?. Eur Surg 53, 114–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00653-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00653-0

Keywords

Navigation