Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating soil hydraulic conductivity using different data-driven models of ANN, GMDH and GMDH-HS

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The saturated hydraulic conductivity (\(K_{\text{s}}\)) is one of the important soil hydraulic properties which plays a significant role in developing flow transport models and irrigation and drainage practices. In this research, artificial neural networks approaches, group method of data handling (GMDH) model and a hybrid intelligent model based on combination of GMDH and harmony search (HS) model (GMDH-HS) were developed to estimate \(K_{\text{s}}\) based on 151 field samples collected from the northeast of Iran. Eleven topsoil properties were used as input parameters to estimate \(K_{\text{s}}\). The five quantitative standard statistical performance evaluation measures, i.e., coefficient of efficiency, root-mean-square error, mean square relative error, mean absolute percentage error and relative bias, were employed to evaluate the performance of various developed models. Statistical results indicated that the best performance can be obtained by GMDH-HS in terms of different evaluated criteria during the training and testing datasets for \(K_{\text{s}}\) estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agyare WA, Park SJ, Vlek PLG (2007) Artificial neural network estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity. VZJ 6:423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrey IA, Odiyo JO, Makungo R, Kataka MO (2017) Effect of hysteresis on water flow in the vadose zone under natural boundary conditions, Siloam Village case study, South Africa. J Hydroinform 20(1):88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayvaz MT (2009) Application of harmony search algorithm to the solution of groundwater management models. Adv Water Resour 32:916–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaeian E, Homaee M, Montzka C, Vereecken H, Norouzi AA (2015) Towards retrieving soil hydraulic properties by hyperspectral remote sensing. VZJ 14:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SF (2005) Complex systems modeling theory and methods. Southeast university Press, Nass Jing

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Samui P, Sabat AK (2011) Prediction of field hydraulic conductivity of clay liners using an artificial neural network and support vector machine. Int J Geomech 12:606–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng J, Chen X, Du Z, Zhang Y (2011) Soil water simulation and predication using stochastic models based on LS-SVM for red soil region of China. EWRA 25:2823–2836

    Google Scholar 

  • Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. SAGE 76:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu KL (2011) Hydrologic forecasting using artificial neural networks: a Bayesian sequential Monte Carlo approach. J Hydroinform 13:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivakhnenko AG (1968) The group method of data handling-a rival of the method of stochastic approximation. Sov Automatic Control 1(3):43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivakhnenko AG, Ivakhnenko GA (2000) Problems of further development of the group method of data handling algorithms. Part I. Pattern Recognit Image Anal C/C of raspoznavaniye obrazov I analiz izobrazhen II. 10:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargas G, Kerkides P, Sotirakoglou K, Poulovassilis A (2016) Temporal variability of surface soil hydraulic properties under various tillage systems. Soil Tillage Res 158:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourgeois O, Bouvier C, Brunet P, Ayral PA (2016) Inverse modeling of soil water content to estimate the hydraulic properties of a shallow soil and the associated weathered bedrock. J Hydrol 541:116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Geem ZW (2005) A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3902–3933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoumi Shahr-Babak M, Khanjani MJ, Qaderi K (2016) Uplift capacity prediction of suction caisson in clay using a hybrid intelligence method (GMDH-HS). Appl Ocean Res 59:408–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie N, Jacquier D (1997) Improving the field estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity in soil survey. Soil Res 35:803–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B, Hopmans JW, Harter T, Eching SO, Tuli A, Denton MA (2004) Neural networks prediction of soil hydraulic functions for alluvial soils using multistep outflow data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:417–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller JA, Ivakhnenko AG (1996) Self-organizing modelling in analysis and prediction of stock market. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on application of fuzzy systems and soft computing—ICAFS, vol 96, pp 491–500

  • Nemes A, Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA (2005) Influence of organic matter on the estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1330–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL (1985) Prediction of soil water properties for hydrologic modelling. In: Jones EB, Ward TJ (eds) Proceedings of a symposium watershed management in the eighties. New York, 30 April–1 May 1985, pp 293–299

  • Santos FL, Jesus VAMD, Valente DSM (2012) Modeling of soil penetration resistance using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks. Acta Sci Agron J 34:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamseldin AY, O’connor KM, Nasr AE (2007) A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall—runoff models. HSJ 52:896–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomatine DP, Ostfeld A (2008) Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches. J Hydroinform 10:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungaro F, Calzolari C, Busoni E (2005) Development of pedotransfer functions using a group method of data handling for the soil of the Pianura Padano-Veneta region of North Italy: water retention properties. Geoderma 124:293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WC, Chau KW, Cheng CT, Qiu L (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydroinform 374:294–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu CL, Chau KW (2006) A flood forecasting neural network model with genetic algorithm. IJEP 28:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang WL, An MQ, Li YZ, He RC, Zhang JF (2014) An improved global-best harmony search algorithm for faster optimization. Expert Syst Appl 41:5788–5803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon H, Hyun Y, Lee KK (2007) Forecasting solute breakthrough curves through the unsaturated zone using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 335:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahidreza Jalali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qaderi, K., Jalali, V., Etminan, S. et al. Estimating soil hydraulic conductivity using different data-driven models of ANN, GMDH and GMDH-HS. Paddy Water Environ 16, 823–833 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0672-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0672-9

Keywords

Navigation