Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines

  • Clinical Guidelines
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early colon cancer (ECC) has been defined as a carcinoma with invasion limited to the submucosa regardless of lymph node status and according to the Royal College of Pathologists as TNM stage T1 NX M0. As the potential risk of lymph node metastasis ranges from 6 to 17 % and the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis is not reliable, the management of ECC is still controversial, varying from endoscopic to radical resection. A meeting on recent advances on the management of colorectal polyps endorsed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) took place in April 2014, in Genoa (Italy). Based on this material the SICCR decided to issue guidelines updating the evidence and to write a position statement paper in order to define the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for ECC treatment in context of the Italian healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams GT, Quirke P, Shepherd NA (2012) Dataset for colorectal cancer, 2nd edn. http://www.rcpath.org/Resources/RCPath/Migrated%20Resources/Documents/G/G049-ColorectalDataset-Sep07.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012

  2. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H et al (2004) The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 51:998–1000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruiz-Tovar J, Jimenez-Miramon J, Valle A, Limones M (2010) Endoscopic resection as unique treatment for early colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 102:435–441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Son HJ, Song SY, Lee WY et al (2008) Characteristics of early colorectal carcinoma with lymph node metastatic disease. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1293–1297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Logan RF, Patnick J, Nickerson C, Coleman L, Rutter MD, von Wagner C (2012) Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 61:1439–1446

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, ESMO Guidelines Working Group et al (2013) Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi64–vi72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benson AB, Bekaii-Saab T, Chan E, National Comprehensive cancer Network et al (2013) Localized colon cancer, version 3.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 11:519–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum et al (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 17:1–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams JG, Pullan RD, Hill J, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland et al (2013) Management of the malignant colorectal polyp: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis 15(Suppl 2):1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Binda GA, Haboubi N (2015) Special issue: Colorectal polyps: recent advances from genetics to management: 2nd Genoa meeting 14 April 2014. Preface. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 1):2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zinicola R, Hill J, Fiocca R (2015) Surgery for colorectal polyps: histological features, current indications, critical points, future perspective and ongoing studies. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 1):52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP (2005) The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach 27:639–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Sullivan D, Wilk S, Michalowski W, Farion K (2013) Using PICO to align medical evidence with MDs decision making models. Stud Health Technol Inform 192:1057

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. http://www.cebm.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CEBM-Levels-of-Evidence-2.1.pdf

  15. Lambert R, Kudo SE, Vieth M et al (2009) Pragmatic classification of superficial neoplastic colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 70:1182–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366:687–696

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kantsevoy SV, Adler DG, Conway JD et al (2008) Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 68:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ASGE Standard of Practice Committee (2013) Guideline: role of endoscopy in the staging and management of colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 78:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al (2008) Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 299:1027–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Buffoli F, Gizzi G, Tessari F, Flat Lesions Italian Network (2010) Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: an Italian multicenter observational study. Endoscopy 42:279–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Buffoli F, Gizzi G, Tessari F, Cipolletta L (2011) The Cooperative Italian FLIN Study Group: prevalence and clinico-pathological features of colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Endoscopy 43:856–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI et al (2008) Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 68(4 Suppl):S3–S47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. No authors listed (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6 Suppl): S3–S43

  24. Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR, Kashida H, Kogure E (2001) Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy 33:367–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG et al (2013) Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 78:625–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wada Y, Kudo SE, Kashida H et al (2009) Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 70:522–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagata S, Tanaka S, Haruma K et al (2000) Pit pattern diagnosis of early colorectal carcinoma by magnifying colonoscopy: clinical and histological implications. Int J Oncol 16:927–934

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kohgo Y (2013) Image-enhanced endoscopy for the diagnosis of colon neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 77:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujii T, Hasegawa RT, Saitoh Y et al (2001) Chromoscopy during colonoscopy. Endoscopy 33:1036–1041

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Marmo R et al (2006) Predictive value of magnification chromoendoscopy for diagnosing invasive neoplasia in nonpolypoid colorectal lesions and stratifying patients for endoscopic resection or surgery. Endoscopy 38:470–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y et al (2008) Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2700–2706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanao H, Tanaka S, Oka S, Hirata M, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2009) Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 69:631–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Okamoto Y, Watanabe H, Tominaga K et al (2011) Evaluation of microvessels in colorectal tumors by narrow band imaging magnification: including comparison with magnifying chromoendoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 56:532–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T et al (2006) Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum. Gut 55:1592–1597

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saitoh Y, Obara T, Watari J et al (1998) Invasion depth diagnosis of depressed type early colorectal cancers by combined use of videoendoscopy and chromoendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 48:362–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kobayashi N, Saito Y, Sano Y, Munakata A, Morita T (2007) Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: Endoscopic assessment or the non-lifting sign for diagnosing invasion depth? Endoscopy 39:701–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ishiguro A, Uno Y, Ishiguro Y, Munakata A, Morita T (1999) Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 50:329–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Han KS, Sohn DK, Choi DH et al (2008) Prolongation of the period between biopsy and EMR can influence the non lifting sign in endoscopically resectable colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc 67:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H et al (2001) Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon. Endoscopy 33:682–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tamura S, Nakajo K, Yokoyama Y et al (2004) Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors. Endoscopy 36:306–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Maheshwari A et al (2007) Short- and long-term outcomes of standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal lesions >or =1 cm. Gastrointest Endosc 65:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M, Rex DK (2009) Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 70:344–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Bianco MA et al (2009) Self-assembled hydro-jet system for submucosal elevation before endoscopic resection of nonpolypoid colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 70:1018–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Salerno R, Bianco MA (2010) Two-step piecemeal resection of larger colorectal polyps: Does it make sense? Gastrointest Endosc 72:467–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Park JJ, Cheon JH, Kwon JE et al (2011) Clinical outcomes and factors related to resectability and curability of EMR for early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 74:1337–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Garofano ML et al (2010) A randomised study of hydro-jet vs. needle injection for lifting colorectal lesions prior to endoscopic resection. Dig Liver Dis 42:127–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140:1909–1918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Puli SR, Kakugawa Y, Gotoda T, Antillon D, Saito Y, Antillon MR (2009) Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastroenterol 15:4273–4277

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Woodward TA, Heckman MG, Cleveland P, De Melo S, Raimondo M, Wallace M (2012) Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 107:650–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD (2014) Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 46:388–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF et al (2015) Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 64:57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N et al (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 39:418–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sakamoto T, Mori G, Yamada M et al (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a review. World J Gastroenterol 43:16153–16158

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I et al (2015) Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 29:133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Puli SR, Kakugawa Y, Saito Y, Antillon D, Gotoda T, Antillon MR (2009) Successful complete cure en-bloc resection of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps by endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2147–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F (2009) Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 41:751–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 44:137–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, Yang CM, Liu JY, Zhao SL (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:8282–8287

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T et al (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:583–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H, Oka S, Chayama K (2014) Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 24(Suppl 1):73–79

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A, Vargo J, Saito Y (2015) Indications and techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Am J Gastroenterol. doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Buffoli F, Gizzi G, Tessari F, Italian Colorectal Endoscopic Resection (ICER) Study Group (2014) Endoscopic resection for superficial colorectal neoplasia in Italy: a prospective multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis 46:146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cipolletta L, Bianco MA, Garofano ML, Cipolleta F, Piscopo R, Rotondano G (2009) Can magnification endoscopy detect residual adenoma after piecemeal resection of large sessile colorectal lesions to guide subsequent treatment? A prospective single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1774–1779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR, United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (2012) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 143:844–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kethu SR, Banerjee S, Desilets D et al (2010) Endoscopic tattooing. Gastrointest Endosc 72:681–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Park JW, Sohn DK, Hong CW et al (2008) The usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using a saline test injection method with prepackaged sterile India ink for localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 22:501–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Pathmanathan N (2011) Safety of colonic tattoo with sterile carbon particle suspension: a proposed guideline with illustrative cases. Gastrointest Endosc 74:214–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bartels SA, van derZaag ED, Dekker E, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA (2012) The effect of colonoscopic tattooing on lymph node retrieval and sentinel lymph node mapping. Gastrointest Endosc 76:793–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Al Abbasi T, Saleh F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A, Quereshy FA (2014) Preoperative re-endoscopy in colorectal cancer patients: an institutional experience and analysis of influencing factors. Surg Endosc 28:2808–2814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Seitz U, Bohnacker S, Seewald S et al (2004) Is endoscopic polypectomy an adequate therapy for malignant colorectal adenomas? Presentation of 114 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1789–1796 (discussion 96–97)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gill MD, Rutter MD, Holtham SJ (2013) Management and short-term outcome of malignant colorectal polyps in the north of England (1). Colorectal Dis 15:169–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Cooper HS, Deppisch LM, Gourley WK et al (1995) Endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps: clinicopathologic correlations. Gastroenterology 108:1657–1665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Borschitz T, Gockel I, Kiesslich R, Junginger T (2008) Oncological outcome after local excision of rectal carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 15:3101–3108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cunningham KN, Mills LR, Schuman BM, Mwakyusa DH (1994) Long-term prognosis of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal adenomas. Dig Dis Sci 39:2034–2037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Doornebosch PG, Tollenaar RA, De Graaf EJ (2009) Is the increasing role of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in curation for T1 rectal cancer justified? A systematic review. Acta Oncol 48:343–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Volk EE, Goldblum JR, Petras RE, Carey WD, Fazio VW (1995) Management and outcome of patients with invasive carcinoma arising in colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 109:1801–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JR, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Collaboration et al (2009) A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:280–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Quirke P, Risio M, Lambert R, von Karsa L, Vieth M (2012) European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis, 1st edn—quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 44(Suppl 3):SE116–SE130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE, Wruble LD (1985) Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 89:328–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Pollard CW, Nivatvongs S, Rojanasakul A, Reiman HM, Dozois RR (1992) The fate of patients following polypectomy alone for polyps containing invasive carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 35:933–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR (2002) Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 45:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Matsuda T, Fukuzawa M, Uraoka T et al (2011) Risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with pedunculated type early invasive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Sci 102:1693–1697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Beaton C, Twine CP, Williams GL, Radcliffe AG (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 15:788–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mou S, Soetikno R, Shimoda T, Rouse R, Kaltenbach T (2013) Pathologic predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2692–2703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Brown PJ, Toh EW, Smith KJ et al (2015) New insights into the lymphovascular microanatomy of the colon and the risk of metastases in pT1 colorectal cancer using quantitative methods and 3 dimensional digital reconstruction. Histopathology 67:167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Smith KJ, Jones PF, Burke DA, Treanor D, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2011) Lymphatic vessel distribution in the mucosa and submucosa and potential implications for T1 colorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 54:35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ishikawa Y, Akishima-Fukasawa Y, Ito K, Akasaka Y, Yokoo T, Ishii T (2008) Histopathologic determinants of regional lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Cancer 112:924–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Choi PW, Yu CS, Jang SJ, Jung SH, Kim HC, Kim JC (2008) Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32:2089–2094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kim JH, Cheon JH, Kim TI et al (2008) Effectiveness of radical surgery after incomplete endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal cancers: a clinical study investigating risk factors of residual cancer. Dig Dis Sci 53:2941–2946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H (2002) Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 45:628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Komori K, Hirai T, Kanemitsu Y et al (2010) Is ‘depth of submucosal invasion > or =1,000 microm’ an important predictive factor for lymph node metastases in early invasive colorectal cancer (pT1)? Hepatogastroenterology 57:1123–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bayar S, Saxena R, Emir B, Salem RR (2002) Venous invasion may predict lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:413–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Yamauchi H, Togashi K, Kawamura YJ et al (2008) Pathological predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Surg Today 38:905–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Egashira Y, Yoshida T, Hirata I et al (2004) Analysis of pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis of submucosal invasive colon cancer. Mod Pathol 17:503–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Akishima-Fukasawa Y, Ishikawa Y, Akasaka Y et al (2011) Histopathological predictors of regional lymph node metastasis at the invasive front in early colorectal cancer. Histopathology 59:470–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Kato T et al (2010) Is total mesorectal excision always necessary for T1–T2 lower rectal cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 17:973–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Rasheed S, Bowley DM, Aziz O et al (2008) Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers. Colorectal Dis 10:231–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Wang HS, Liang WY, Lin TC et al (2005) Curative resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma: risk of lymph node metastasis and long-term prognosis. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1182–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Hassan C, Zullo A, Risio M, Rossini FP, Morini S (2005) Histo- logic risk factors and clinical outcome in colorectal malignant polyp: a pooled-data analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1588–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Morson BC, Whiteway JE, Jones EA, Macrae FA, Williams CB (1984) Histopathology and prognosis of malignant colorectal polyps treated by endoscopic polypectomy. Gut 25:437–444

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Coverlizza S, Risio M, Ferrari A, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Rossini FP (1989) Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. Pathologic assessment of lymph node metastatic potential. Cancer 64:1937–1947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Netzer P, Forster C, Biral R et al (1998) Risk factor assessment of endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps. Gut 43:669–674

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Hackelsberger A, Fruhmorgen P, Weiler H, Heller T, Seeliger H, Junghanns K (1995) Endoscopic polypectomy and management of colorectal adenomas with invasive carcinoma. Endoscopy 27:153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Okabe S, Shia J, Nash G et al (2004) Lymph node metastasis in T1 adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. J Gastrointest Surg 8:1032–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Park JW et al (2007) Histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma of pedunculated or semipedunculated type. J Clin Pathol 60:912–915

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Yasuda K, Inomata M, Shiromizu A, Shiraishi N, Higashi H, Kitano S (2007) Risk factors for occult lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer invading the submucosa and indications for endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1370–1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kazama S, Watanabe T, Ajioka Y, Kanazawa T, Nagawa H (2006) Tumour budding at the deepest invasive margin correlates with lymph node metastasis in submucosal colorectal cancer detected by anticytokeratin antibody CAM5.2. Br J Cancer 94:293–298

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2004) Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:385–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Aarons CB, Shanmugan S, Bleier JI (2014) Management of malignant colon polyps: current status and controversies. World J Gastroenterol 20:16178–16183

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Ogawa T, Yoshida T, Tsuruta T et al (2009) Tumor budding is predictive of lymphatic involvement and lymph node metastases in submucosal invasive colorectal adenocarcinomas and in non-polypoid compared with polypoid growths. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:605–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Morodomi T, Isomoto H, Shirouzu K, Kakegawa K, Irie K, Morimatsu M (1989) An index for estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancers. Lymph node metastasis and the histopathology of actively invasive regions of cancer. Cancer 63:539–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Li Destri G, Di Carlo I, Scilletta R, Scilletta B, Puleo S (2014) Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12. World J Gastroenterol 20:1951–1960

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Dejardin O, Ruault E, Jooste V et al (2012) Volume of surgical activity and lymph node evaluation for patients with colorectal cancer in France. Dig Liver Dis 44:261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Elferink MA, Wouters MW, Krijnen P et al (2010) Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 36(Suppl 1):S64–S73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK et al (2008) Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1310–1317

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Shia J, Wang H, Nash GM, Klimstra DS (2012) Lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: revisiting the benchmark of at least 12 lymph nodes in R0 resection. J Am Coll Surg 214:348–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Stocchi L, Fazio VW, Lavery I, Hammel J (2011) Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma. Is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient. Ann Surg Oncol 18:405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364 (discussion 364-365)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Choi HK, Law WL, Poon JT (2010) The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its impact of on outcomes. BMC Cancer 10:267

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. McDonald JR, Renehan AG, O’Dwyer ST, Haboubi NY (2012) Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: current considerations. World J Gastrointest Surg 4:9–19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Qiu HB, Zhang LY, Li YF, Zhou ZW, Keshari RP, Xu RH (2011) Ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes enhances to predict survival in patients with stage III colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1568–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Wasif N, Etzioni D, Maggard MA, Tomlinson JS, Ko CY (2011) Trends, patterns, and outcomes in the management of malignant colonic polyps in the general population of the United States. Cancer 117:931–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Benhaim L, Benoist S, Bachet JB, Julié C, Penna C, Nordlinger B (2012) Salvage colectomy for endoscopically removed malignant colon polyps: Is it possible to determine the optimal number of lymph nodes that need to be harvested? Colorectal Dis 14:79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Gelos M, Gelhaus J, Mehnert P et al (2008) Factors influencing lymph node harvest in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:53–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Romano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bianco, F., Arezzo, A., Agresta, F. et al. Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 19, 577–585 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1361-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1361-y

Keywords

Navigation