Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in the treatment of ovarian cancer

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanisms and clinical significance of lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer have been revealed since the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) introduced a new clinical staging including retroperitoneal lymph node status. The multiple directions of the lymph drainage pathway in ovarian cancer have been recognized. The incidence and pattern of lymph node involvement depends on the extent of disease progression and the histological type. Thus, it is difficult to specify a single node as the sentinel node. As a surgical approach, systemic lymphadenectomy is necessary to obtain accurate clinical stage, and it has obvious diagnostic value. Nevertheless, a recent large randomized trial in patients with advanced ovarian cancer revealed that systemic lymphadenectomy had no impact on survival compared with removing only macroscopic lymph nodes. Other factors, such as chemosensitivity, histological grade, and the size of residuals have also influenced survival in ovarian cancer. From the viewpoint of adverse effects and survival benefit, the efficacy of lymphadenectomy remains controversial. Therefore, further accumulation of clinical data is needed to establish the indications for lymph node dissection; when this procedure is done, it should be performed by experienced gynecologic oncologists at selected institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AA Plentl EA Friedman (1971) Lymphatic system of the female genitalia WB Saunders Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. J Carter (2004) Primary surgery for ovarian cancer DM Gersenson WP McGuire (Eds) Gynecologic cancer: controversies in management Elsevier Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  3. P Benedetti Panici R Angioni (2002) ArticleTitleRole of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 16 529–551 Occurrence Handle10.1053/beog.2002.0301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R Kudo et al. (2003) ArticleTitleClassification of regional lymph nodes in Japan Int J Clin Oncol 8 248–275 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10147-003-0343-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F Parazzini G Valsecchi G Bolis et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePelvic and paraaortic lymph nodal status in advanced ovarian cancer and survival Gynecol Oncol 74 7–11 Occurrence Handle10385545 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1999.5397 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjtlOnug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. N Tsumura N Sakuragi S Fujimoto et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAn analysis of pelvic and paraaorticlymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma by systematic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 48 508–514 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3MnhvFw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. F DiRe G Baiocchi R Fontanelli et al. (1996) ArticleTitleSystematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for advanced ovarian cancer: prognostic significance of node metastasis Gynecol Oncol 62 360–365 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1996.0249 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymH38jktVw%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P Morice F Joulie S Camatte et al. (2003) ArticleTitleLymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of 276 pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomies and surgical implications J Am Coll Surg 197 198–205 Occurrence Handle12892797 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00234-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. T Onda H Yoshikawa Y Taketani et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAssessment of metastases to aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in epithelial ovarian carcinoma a proposal for essential sites for lymph node biopsy Cancer 78 803–808 Occurrence Handle8756375 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960815)78:4<803::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-Z Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA38nislQ%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P Benedetti-Panici S Greggi et al. (1993) ArticleTitleAnatomical and pathological study of retroperitoneal nodes in epithelial ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 51 150–154 Occurrence Handle8276287 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1993.1263 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3c3lvFY%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. E Burghardt F Girardi M Lahousen et al. (1991) ArticleTitlePatterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 40 103–106 Occurrence Handle2010101 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0090-8258(91)90099-Q Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C1cvmtlc%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. N Sakuragi H Yamada S Fujimoto et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and clear cell histology in ovarian carcinoma limited to the pelvis (pT1M0 and pT2M0) Gynecol Oncol 79 251–255 Occurrence Handle11063653 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.2000.5933 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjsVKktA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N Takeshima Y Hirai K Hasumi et al. (2005) ArticleTitleLymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer: difference between serous and non-serous primary tumors Gynecol Oncol 99 427–431 Occurrence Handle16112718 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. E Petru M Lahousen K Tamussino et al. (1994) ArticleTitleLymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer Am J Obstet Gynecol 170 656–662 Occurrence Handle8116728 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC287htFE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. H Negishi M Takeda N Sakuragi et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLymphatic mapping and sentinel node identification as related to the primary site of lymph node metastasis in early stage ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 94 161–166 Occurrence Handle15262135 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. G Baiocchi F Raspagliesi F DiRe et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEarly ovarian cancer: is there a role for systemic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy? Int J Gynecol Cancer 8 103–108 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-1438.1998.09758.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K Sakai T Kamura H Nakano et al. (1997) ArticleTitleRelationship between pelvic lymph node involvement and other disease sites in patients with ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 65 164–168 Occurrence Handle9103407 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1997.4624 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2Mnls1I%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H Cass A Li C Runowicz et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePattern of lymph node metastases in clinically unilateral stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas Gynecol Oncol 80 56–61 Occurrence Handle11136570 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.2000.6027 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gtFentA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K Kanazawa T Suzuki M Tokashiki (1999) ArticleTitleThe validity and significance of substage IIIc by node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of nodal metastasis on patient survival Gynecol Oncol 73 237–241 Occurrence Handle10329040 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1999.5349 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3mtlCksQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. KA O'Hanlan S Kragas M Schreiber et al. (1995) ArticleTitleOvarian carcinoma metastases to gastrointestinal tract appear to spread like colon carcinoma Gynecol Oncol 59 200–206 Occurrence Handle7590473 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1995.0008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. P Benedetti-Panici A Maggioni N Hacker et al. (2005) ArticleTitleSystemic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial J Natl Cancer Inst 97 560–566

    Google Scholar 

  22. N Tsuruchi T Kamura Tsukamoto et al. (1993) ArticleTitleRelationship between paraaortic lymph node involvement and intraperitoneal spread in patients with ovarian cancer – a multivariate analysis Gynecol Oncol 49 51–55 Occurrence Handle8482561 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1993.1085 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB2cnislE%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. T Onda H Yoshikawa Y Taketani et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePatients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systemic lymphadenectomy have similar survival to stage I/II patients and superior survival to other stage III patients Cancer 83 1555–1560 Occurrence Handle9781949 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981015)83:8<1555::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO;2-R Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltlaisg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. WA Cliby GD Aletti KC Podratz et al. (2006) ArticleTitleIs it justified to classify patients to stage IIIc epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only? Gynecol Oncol 103 797–801 Occurrence Handle17052746 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.08.047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. F DiRe G Baiocchi (2000) ArticleTitleValue of lymph node assessment in ovarian cancer: status of the art at the end of the second millennium Int J Gynecol Cancer 10 435–442 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.00053.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. NM Spitos GM Gross JL Freddo et al. (1995) ArticleTitleCytoreductiove surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary: the impact of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy Gynecol Oncol 56 345–352 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1995.1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J Evans E Spiess A Kamat et al. (2006) ArticleTitleChylous ascites after post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection :review of the M. D. Anderson experience J Urol 176 1463–1467 Occurrence Handle16952661 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. T Manolitsas S Abdessalam J Fowler (2002) ArticleTitleChylous ascites following treatment for gynecologic malignancies Gynecol Oncol 86 370–374 Occurrence Handle12217764 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.2002.6754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. S Takeuchi H Kinoshita K Terasawa et al. (2006) ArticleTitleChylous ascites following operation for para-aortic lymph node dissection in a patient with cervical cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 IssueIDSuppl 1 418–422 Occurrence Handle16515637 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00212.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. F Carmino G Fuda G Ciccone et al. (1997) ArticleTitleSignificance of lymph node sampling in epithelial carcinoma of the ovary Gynecol Oncol 65 467–472 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1997.4633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C Scarabelli A Gallo A Zarrelli et al. (1995) ArticleTitleSystematic pelvic and paraaorticlymphadenectomy during cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: potential benefit on survival Gynecol Oncol 56 328–337 Occurrence Handle7705665 Occurrence Handle10.1006/gyno.1995.1059 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB38%2FntVE%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. E Burghardt H Pickel M Lahousen et al. (1986) ArticleTitlePelvic lymph- adenectomy in operative treatment of ovarian cancer Am J Obstet Gynecol 155 315–319 Occurrence Handle3740148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimB1MzhtVA%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A Maggioni P Benedetti-Panici T Dell'Anna et al. (2006) ArticleTitleRandomized study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis Br J Cancer 95 699–704 Occurrence Handle16940979 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.bjc.6603323 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rktVGitw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. S Chambers (2005) ArticleTitleSystematic lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: two decades of uncertainly resolved J Natl Cancer Inst 97 548–549 Occurrence Handle15840870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. DuBois A, Reuss A, Harter P, et al. (2006) The role of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with macroscopically complete resection of intraperitoneal disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(Suppl 3): Abstract #0008

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan

    Kimio Ushijima

Authors
  1. Kimio Ushijima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimio Ushijima.

About this article

Cite this article

Ushijima, K. Management of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 12, 181–186 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0672-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0672-z

Key words

Search

Navigation