Skip to main content
Log in

Value of MRI in three patients with major vascular injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe three cases of major vascular injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy depicted on magnetic resonance (MR) examination. Three female patients (mean age, 32 years; range, 22–39 years) were studied with clinical suspicion of bilio-vascular injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All MR examinations were performed within 24 h after the laparoscopic procedure. MR imaging was evaluated for major vascular injuries involving the arterial and portal venous system, for bile duct discontinuity, presence or absence of biliary dilation, stricture, excision injury, free fluid and collections. In the first patient, a type-IV Bismuth injury with associated intrahepatic bile ducts dilation was observed. Contrast-enhanced MR revealed lack of enhancement in the right hepatic lobe due to occlusion of the right hepatic artery and the right portal branch. This patient underwent right hepatectomy with hepatico-jejunostomy. In the other two cases, no visualization of the right hepatic artery and the right portal branch was observed on MR angiography. In the first case, the patient underwent right hepatectomy; in the second case, because of stable liver condition, the patient was managed conservatively. MR imaging combined with MR angiography and MR cholangiography can be performed emergently in patients with suspicion of bilio-vascular injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy allowing the simultaneous evaluation of the biliary tree and the hepatic vascular supply that is essential for adequate treatment planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189:101–125

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bachellier P, Nakano H, Weber JC et al (2001) Surgical repair after bile duct and vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: when and how? World J Surg 25:1335–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bismuth H (1983) Post-operative strictures of the bile duct. In: Blumbgart LH (ed) The biliary tract. Churchill-Livingstone, New York, 209–218

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA (1993) Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42.474 patients. Ann Surg 218:129–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ragozzino A, De Ritis R, Mosca A, Iaccarino V, Imbriaco M (2004) Value of MR cholangiography in patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. Am J Roentgenol 183:1567–1572

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bacha EA, Stieber AC, Galloway JR, Hunter JG (1994) Non-biliary complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 344:896–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Usal H, Sayad P, Hayek N, Hallak A, Huie F, Ferzli G (1998) Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An institutional review of experience with 2589 procedures and literature review. Surg Endosc 12:960–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart L, Robinson TN, Lee CM, Liu K, Whang K, Way LW (2004) Right hepatic artery injury associated with laparoscopic bile duct injury: incidence, mechanism, and consequences. J Gastrointest Surg 8:523–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt SC, Settmacher U, Langrehr JM, Neuhaus P (2004) Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic arterial injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 135:613–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koffron A, Ferrario M, Parsons W, Nemcek A, Saker M, Abecassis M (2001) Failed primary management of iatrogenic biliary injury: incidence and significance of concomitant hepatic arterial disruption. Surgery 130:722–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buell JF, Cronin DC, Funaki B et al (2002) Devastating and fatal complications associated with combined vascular and bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 137:703–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta N, Solomon H, Fairchild R, Kaminski DL (1998) Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic artery injuries. Arch Surg 133:176–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tzovaras G, Dervenis C (2006) Vascular injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an underestimated problem. Dig Surg 23:370–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors sincerely thank Dr. Graciana Diez-Roux for critically reviewing this manuscript and Ciro Anatrella and Vincenzo Braun for their valuable technical assistance in making this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Imbriaco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ragozzino, A., Lassandro, F., De Ritis, R. et al. Value of MRI in three patients with major vascular injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Emerg Radiol 14, 443–447 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0617-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0617-x

Keywords

Navigation