Abstract
Nanotechnology is bringing about changes in everyday technologies in fundamental ways, both obvious and non-obvious. In order to address nanotechnology, Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) as a research discipline requires multiple methods in engaging this novel technology strategically. One mode of engagement is through nanomaterials. Nanomaterials can be addressed by HFE in four significant ways: health and safety; new products and embedding in existing technologies for improved qualities; industrial production; along with, through university laboratory research. The aim of this article is to present one manner of engaging nanomaterials and HFE through addressing nanomaterials as embedded in existing technologies and their involvement in university research laboratories. This aspect of engagement is depicted by addressing the use of nanomaterials in an existing well-entrenched technology of concrete to produce an enhanced product—nanoconcrete. Using the framework of Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA), this article addresses the work domain of nanoconcrete in terms of work practices in university laboratory settings. The models derived from CWA are used to identify the various constraints ranging from the environment to the people involved in the concrete domain. The results emphasize that to address nanomaterials (in this case, nanosilica), one has to comprehend its overarching matrix of the material (concrete) in which it is embedded. While the current article presents just one facet studying the intersection between nanomaterials and HFE, further research can identify new ways in which nanotechnology could be integrated robustly in the disciplinary viewpoint of HFE.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACI (2013) ACI concrete terminology: an ACI STANDARD. http://www.concrete.org/portals/0/files/pdf/ACI_Concrete_Terminology.pdf. Retrieved 19 July 2014
Aitken RJ, Chaudhry MQ, Boxall A, Hull M (2006) Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. Occup Med 56(5):300–306
AlbertaTechFutures (2015) AlbertaTechFutures. http://www.albertatechfuturesca/nanoalbertaaspx. Retrieved 22 April 2015
BCG (2013) The cement sector: a strategic contributor to Europe’s future. http://www.cembureau.eu/newsroom/european-cement-industry-strategic-contributor-europes-future-0. Retrieved 19 July 2014
Birgisson B, Mukhopadhyay AK, Geary G, Khan M, Sobolev K (2012) Nanotechnology in concrete materials: a synopsis (No. E-C170). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec170.pdf. Retrieved 19 July 2014
Cacciabue PC (2006) CTW special issue on human-centred design in automotive systems. Cogn Technol Work 8(3):159–160. doi:10.1007/s10111-006-0036-x
Cacciabue PC, Carsten O, Vanderhaegen F (2014) Is there still a need for CTW? Cogn Technol Work 16(3):311–317. doi:10.1007/s10111-014-0286-y
CEFIC (2016) Nanomaterials—safe and innovative. http://www.cefic.org/Policy-Centre/Environment–health/Nanomaterials/. Retrieved 20 September 2016
CEMBUREAU (2013) The role of cement in the 2050 low carbon economy. http://www.cembureau.be/role-cement-2050-low-carbon-economy. Retrieved 19 July 2014
CFI (n.d.) CFI Strategic Roadmap 2012–17. http://www.innovation.ca/en/AboutUs/Publicationsandreports/CFIStrategicRoadmap201217
Charitidis CA, Georgiou P, Koklioti MA, Trompeta A-F, Markakis V (2014) Manufacturing nanomaterials: from research to industry. Manuf Rev 1:11
Chowdhury A, Sanjog J, Reddy SM, Karmakar S (2012) Nanomaterials in the field of design ergonomics: present status. Ergonomics 55(12):1453–1462
CITC (2011) Nanotechnology subsector study. http://www.ictc-ctic.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ICTC_NanoTechExecSummary_EN_06-11.pdf
CPI (2016) Consumer product inventory. http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/. Retrieved 20 Sept 2016
Danks AE, Hall SR, Schnepp Z (2016) The evolution of “sol–gel” chemistry as a technique for materials synthesis. Mater Horiz 3(2):91–112
FHWA (2014) Federal highway administration research and technology: exploratory advanced research program. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/advancedresearch/research/focus.cfm. Retrieved 20 October 2014
Flach J (2015) Supporting productive thinking: the semiotic context for Cognitive Systems Engineering (CSE). Appl Ergon. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.001
Foladori G, Invernizzi N (2005) Nanotechnology in its socio-economic context. Sci Stud 18(2):67–73
Forty A (2013) Concrete and culture: a material history. Reaktion Books, London
Gould J (1995) Aiding intellectual work. In: Nickerson RS (ed) Emerging needs and opportunities for human factors research. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 291–321. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4940
Greaves-Holmes WL (2009) A guide for the safe handling of engineered and fabricated nanomaterials. J Technol Stud. doi:10.21061/jots.v35i1.a.5
Greaves-Holmes WL (2012) A retrospective analysis and field study of nanotechnology-related ergonomic risk in industries utilizing nanomaterials. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida. http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0004497/Greaves-Holmes_Wanda_L_201205_PhD.pdf
Hollnagel E (2012) Coping with complexity: past, present and future. Cogn Technol Work 14(3):199–205. doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0202-7
Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
IEA, WBCSD (2009a) Cement technology roadmap 2009-foldout. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Cement_Roadmap_Foldout_WEB.pdf. Retrieved 19 July 2014
IEA, WBCSD (2009b) Cement technology roadmap 2009: carbon emissions reductions up to 2050. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Cement.pdf. Retrieved 19 July 2014
Ingold T (2011) Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge, New York
Ingold T (2013) Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge, New York
Jenkins DP, Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker G (2009) Cognitive work analysis: coping with complexity. Ashgate, Burlington
Jiménez A, Brouwer D, Van Tongeren M (2014) Workplace inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology. doi:10.1201/b16562-8
Jones PH (2005) Information practices and cognitive artifacts in scientific research. Cogn Technol Work 7(2):88–100. doi:10.1007/s10111-005-0178-2
Kant V (2015) Extending cognitive work analysis and engaging nanotechnology: embodied, embedded and socially situated processes. University of Waterloo. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/9435. Retrieved 19 July 2015
Kant V (2016) Extending Cognitive Work Analysis for embodiment: ecological psychology, activity theory and Worker Competency Analysis. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2016.1243740
Kant V, Burns CM (2016) Engaging nanotechnology: ethnography of lab-on-a-chip technology in small-scale fluidics research. Cogn Technol Work 18(1):33–52. doi:10.1007/s10111-015-0344-0
Karwowski W (2006) From past to future: building a collective vision for HFES 2020. HFES Bull 49(11):1–3
Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S (2013) Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 15(6):1–17. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4
Kuempel ED, Geraci CL, Schulte PA (2012) Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice. Ann Occup Hyg 56(5):491–505
Latour B, Woolgar S (1979) Laboratory life: the social construction ofscientific facts. Sage, Beverly Hills
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lintern G (2012) Work-focused analysis and design. Cogn Technol Work 14(1):71–81. doi:10.1007/s10111-010-0167-y
Lundstrom M, Wong HSP (2013) Convergence platforms: foundational science and technology tools. In: Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (eds) Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–52. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02204-8_1
Lynch M (1985) Art and artifact in laboratory lcience: a study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. Routledge and Keagen Paul, London
MacPhail RC, Grulke EA, Yokel RA (2013) Assessing nanoparticle risk poses prodigious challenges. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomedicine Nanobiotechnology 5(4):374–387. doi:10.1002/wnan.1216
Maynard A (2014) A decade of uncertainty in nanoscale science and engineering. Nat Nanotechnol 9:159–160
Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G et al (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444(7117):267–269. doi:10.1038/444267a
Miyazaki K, Islam N (2007) Nanotechnology systems of innovation—an analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation 27(11):661–675
nanoAlberta (2007) Alberta nanotechnology strategy. http://www.albertatechfutures.ca/Portals/0/Business%20and%20Industry%20Support/nanotechnology_strategy_complete2.pdf
NanotechnologyAssetMap (2009) Creating opportunity Alberta’s nanotechnology asset map 2009. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures. http://www.albertatechfutures.ca/Portals/0/documents/newsroom/publications/2010/Alberta_Nanotechnology_Asset_Map_2009.pdf
NIOSH (2012) General safe practices for working with engineered nanomaterials in research laboratories (No. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2012–147). NIOSH. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2012-147/pdfs/2012-147.pdf
NIOSH (2013a) Protecting the nanotechnology workforce: NIOSH nanotechnology research and guidance strategic plan, 2013–2016. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati, OH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 2014–106. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2014-106/pdfs/2014-106.pdf
NIOSH (2013b) Nanotechnology at NIOSH. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/nanotechnology-research-center.html. Retrieved 20 September 2016
NNCI (2016) National nanotechnlogy coordinated infrastructure. http://www.nnci.net/about-nnci/. Retrieved 1 October 2016
NSTC (2014) National nanotechnology initiative strategic plan. http://www.nano.gov/node/1113
NTI (2012) 2012 Annual report nanotechnology institute. http://nanotechinstitute.org/wp-content/NTI-2012-Annual-Report-Final.pdf
OSHA (2011) Laboratory safety guidance (No. OSHA 3404-11R). US department of Labor. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/laboratory/OSHA3404laboratory-safety-guidance.pdf
Palmberg C, Dernis H, Miguet C (2009) Nanotechnology: an overview based on indicators and statistics (No. DSTI/DOC(2009)7). OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/43179651.pdf
Peng H-S, Chiu DT (2015) Soft fluorescent nanomaterials for biological and biomedical imaging. Chem Soc Rev 44(14):4699–4722. doi:10.1039/c4cs00294f
Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2012) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res 14(9):1–11. doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1109-9
Pye D (1968) The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raj S, Jose S, Sumod US, Sabitha M (2012) Nanotechnology in cosmetics: opportunities and challenges. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 4(3):186–193
Ray PC, Yu H, Fu PP (2009) Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: challenges and future needs. J Environ Sci Health Part C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27(1):1–35
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2013) The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. J Nanopart Res 15(9):1–17
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (eds) (2013). Convergence of knowledge, technology and society. World Technology Evaluation Center. http://www.wtec.org/NBIC2/Docs/FinalReport/Pdf-secured/NBIC2-FinalReport-WTECversion–web.pdf
RTNN (2016) Research Triangle Nanotechnology Network. http://www.mse.ncsu.edu/rtnn/about. Retrieved 1 October 2016
Safiuddin M, Gonzalez M, Cao J, Tighe SL (2014) State-of-the-art report on use of nano-materials in concrete. Int J Pavement Eng 15(10):940–949. doi:10.1080/10298436.2014.893327
Salata OV (2004) Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnology 2:3
Salmon P, Jenkins D, Stanton N, Walker G (2010) Hierarchical task analysis vs. cognitive work analysis: comparison of theory, methodology and contribution to system design. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 11(6):504–531. doi:10.1080/14639220903165169
Sanchez F, Sobolev K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete—a review. Constr Build Mater 24(11):2060–2071
Statnano (2016) Nanotechnology products database. http://product.statnano.com/. Retrieved 20 September 2016
STIC (2013) State of the nation 2012 Canada’s science, technology and innovation system: aspiring to global leadership. http://www.stic-csti.ca/eic/site/stic-csti.nsf/vwapj/StateOfTheNation2012-may16-eng.pdf/$file/StateOfTheNation2012-may16-eng.pdf
Suchman LA (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Szewczyk P (2014) Technical, ecological, and social aspects of nanotechnologies. In: Marek T, Karwowski W, Frankowicz M, Kantola J, Zgaga P (eds) Human factors of a global society: a system of systems perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 107–114
Thursby J, Thursby M (2011) University–industry linkages in nanotechnology and biotechnology: evidence on collaborative patterns for new methods of inventing. J Technol Transf 36(6):605–623
TRB (2016) TRB committees related to safety and human factors. http://www.trb.org/SafetyHumanFactors/TRBCommittees.aspx. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
Upton C, Doherty G, Gleeson F, Sheridan C (2010) Designing decision support in an evolving sociotechnical enterprise. Cogn Technol Work 12(1):13–30. doi:10.1007/s10111-008-0124-1
Vance ME, Kuiken T, Vejerano EP, McGinnis SP, Hochella MF Jr, Rejeski D, Hull MS (2015) Nanotechnology in the real world: redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6(1):1769–1780
Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Vyas D (2013) Ethnographic notes on visualization practices in tissue engineering research. Cogn Technol Work 15(4):373–388. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0238-3
Waser R (2012) Nanoelectronics and information technology, 3rd edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
WBCSD (2009) The cement sustainability initiative: recycling concrete. http://www.wbcsdcement.org/pdf/CSI-RecyclingConcrete-FullReport.pdf. Retrieved 19 July 2014
WHO (2013) Nanotechnology and human health: scientific evidence and risk governance. Copenhagen. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/233154/e96927.pdf?ua=1
Wiener N (1994) Invention: the care and feeding of ideas. MIT Press, Cambridge
Yadav TP, Yadav RM, Singh DP (2012) Mechanical milling: a top down approach for the synthesis of nanomaterials and nanocomposites. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2(3):22–48
Yang QZ, Miao CY (2010) Integrating human factors into nanotech sustainability assessment and communication. Presented at the The 5th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA), 2010, IEEE, pp 1–5
Yao J, Yang M, Duan Y (2014) Chemistry, biology, and medicine of fluorescent nanomaterials and related systems: new insights into biosensing, bioimaging, genomics, diagnostics, and therapy. Chem Rev 114(12):6130–6178. doi:10.1021/cr200359p
Yokel RA, MacPhail RC (2011) Engineered nanomaterials: exposures, hazards, and risk prevention. J Occup Med Toxicol 6(1):7–27. doi:10.1186/1745-6673-6-7
Zumwalde RD, Kuempel ED, Holdsworth G (2015) NIOSH [2015]. External review draft—current intelligence bulletin: health effects of occupational exposure to silver nanomaterials. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/review/docket260a/pdfs/draft–niosh-cib-on-silver-nanomaterials-1_8_16.pdf
Acknowledgements
This study would not have been possible without MGH introducing me to the inner world of concrete pavement engineering. Also, many thanks to the Director of the laboratory in which this research was conducted. All the researchers in the laboratory were extremely helpful and supportive throughout the duration of fieldwork. Thanks to all the researchers and the laboratory director. Due to reasons of ensuring anonymity to research participants, their names are not divulged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kant, V. Revisiting the technologies of the old: a case study of cognitive work analysis and nanomaterials. Cogn Tech Work 19, 47–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0397-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0397-8