Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Life cycle assessment of membrane-based carbon capture and storage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many investigations have conducted life cycle assessments (LCA) of the most commonly discussed routes of carbon capture and storage (CCS): post-combustion with amine wash separation; oxyfuel using cryogenic air separation and pre-combustion by integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) using physical separation. A research alliance developed corresponding separation systems using different types of membranes to allow a more energy efficient separation process: polyactive polymeric membranes for post-combustion, ceramic membranes for oxyfuel and metallic membranes for IGCC separation. By conducting an LCA, the study examines the actual greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts of the new membrane separation technologies, together with concepts implementing the more common technologies. The reference systems represent today’s state-of-the-art supercritical coal fired power plant in Germany, together with a more advanced ultra-supercritical plant operating at 700 °C without CO2 capture. The results demonstrate that among the three reference power plants the IGCC is the superior concept due to the highest efficiency. Regarding climate change, the IGCC power plants with CO2 capture are still the best concepts. When other environmental impacts are considered, the capture technologies are inferior. The membrane concepts show the overall better results in comparison to the conventional capture technologies. The environmental impacts for membrane applications add a new range of findings to the field of CCS LCAs. Now the results for several different approaches can be compared directly for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anheden M, Burchhardt U, Ecke H, Faber R, Jidinger O, Giering R et al (2011) Overview of operational experience and results from test activities in Vattenfall’s 30 MWth oxyfuel pilot plant in Schwarze Pumpe. In: Energy Procedia, pp 941–950. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.140

  • ASPEN www.aspentech.com/products/engineering/aspen-plus/

  • Baumann S, Serra JM, Lobera MP, Escolástico S, Schulze-Küppers F, Meulenberg WA (2011) Ultrahigh oxygen permeation flux through supported Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ membranes. J Membr Sci 377:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berrill P, Arvesen A, Scholz Y, Gils HC, Hertwich EG (2016) Environmental impacts of high penetration renewable energy scenarios for Europe. Environ Res Lett 11:014012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann T, Pohlmann J, Bram M, Zhao L, Tota A, Escalona NJ et al (2015) Investigating the influence of the pressure distribution in a membrane module on the cascaded membrane system for post-combustion capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 39:194–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti A, Drioli E, Lee YM, Barbieri G (2014) Engineering evaluation of CO2 separation by membrane gas separation systems. J Membr Sci 454:305–315. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carbo MC, Jansen D, Haije WG, Verkooijen AHM (2006) Advanced membrane reactors for fuel decarbonisation in IGCC: H2 or CO2 separation? In: 5th Annual conference on carbon capture and sequestration, Alexandria, VA, p 9

  • Cassano A, Basile A (2013) Integrating different membrane operations and combining membranes with conventional separation techniques in industrial processes. Handb Membr React 2:296–343. doi:10.1533/9780857097347.1.296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo R (2011a) Thermodynamic analysis of a hard coal oxyfuel power plant with high temperature three-end membrane for air separation. Appl Energy 88(5):1480–1493. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo R (2011b) Thermodynamic evaluation of membrane based oxyfuel power plants with 700 °C technology. Energy Procedia 4:1026–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa P, Lozza GG, Kreutz TG (2007) CO2 sequestration from IGCC power plants by means of metallic membranes. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 129:123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa P, Manzolini G, Romano MC (2015) The use of membranes in oxygen and hydrogen separation in integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants. Membr React Energy Appl Basic Chem Prod. doi:10.1016/B978-1-78242-223-5.00013-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsten M, Ramírez A, Shen L, Koornneef J, Faaij A (2013) Environmental impact assessment of CCS chains: lessons learned and limitations from LCA literature. Int J Greenh Gas Control 13:59–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2015) Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: a critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J CO2 Util 9:82–102. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czyperek M, Zapp P, Bouwmeester HJM, Modigell M, Ebert K, Voigt I et al (2010) Gas separation membranes for zero-emission fossil power plants: MEM-BRAIN. J Membr Sci 359:149–159. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon DJ, Panesar RS, Wall RA, Allam RJ, White V, Gibbins J et al (2005) Oxy-combustion processes for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical PF and NGCC power plant. In: 7th International conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, London, Elsevier, pp 211–220

  • Doka G (2007) Critical review of diploma-Thesis No. 2077M505 “Life Cycle Assessment of Selected Technologies for CO2 Transport and Sequestration” (C. Wildbolz). www.doka.ch ecoinvent2 www.ecoinvent.org

  • Eiberger J, Wilkner K, Reetz C, Sebold D, Jordan N, de Graaff M et al (2015) Influence of coal power plant exhaust gas on the structure and performance of ceramic nanostructured gas separation membranes. Int J Greenh Gas Control 43:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engels S, Beggel F, Modigell M, Stadler H (2010) Simulation of a membrane unit for oxyfuel power plants under consideration of realistic BSCF membrane properties. J Membr Sci 359:93–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franz J, Maas P, Scherer V (2014) Economic evaluation of pre-combustion CO2-capture in IGCC power plants by porous ceramic membranes. Appl Energy 130:532–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldbach A, Bao F, Qi C, Bao C, Zhao L, Hao C et al (2015) Evaluation of Pd composite membrane for pre-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 33:69–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GaBi6.0 GaBi 6.0 (Ganzheitliche Bilanzierung) Software. www.thinkstep.com/software/gabi-lca

  • IEA (2010) Energy technology perspectives: scenarios and strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the 5th assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland

  • ISO 14040/14044 (2006) Environmental management: life cycle assessment—principles and framework (14040)/requirements and guidelines (14044) vol 14040/14044. International Organization for Standardization, Genf (Schweiz)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen D, Gazzani M, Manzolini G, Ev D, Carbo M (2015) Pre-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 40:167–187. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalilpour R, Mumford K, Zhai H, Abbas A, Stevens G, Rubin ES (2015) Membrane-based carbon capture from flue gas: a review. J Clean Prod 103:286–300. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsonikolas DE, Kaldis SP, Pantoleontos GT, Zaspalis VT, Sakellaropoulos GP (2013) Techno-economic assessment of polymeric, ceramic and metallic membranes integration in an advanced IGCC process for H2 production and CO2 capture vol 35. doi:10.3303/CET1335119

  • Markewitz P, Kuckshinrichs W, Leitner W, Linssen J, Zapp P, Bongartz R et al (2012) Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy Environ Sci 5:7281–7305. doi:10.1039/C2EE03403D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mass P, Nauels N, Zhao L, Markewitz P, Scherer V, Modigell M et al (2016) Energetic and economic evaluation of membrane based carbon capture routes for power plant processes. Int J Greenh Gas Control 44:124–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser P, Schmidt S, Sieder G, Garcia H, Stoffregen T (2011) Performance of MEA in a long-term test at the post-combustion capture pilot plant in Niederaussem. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:620–627. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nauels N, Beggel F, Engels S, Modigell M (2010) MIEC membranes in an oxyfuel power plant process. In: 20th Annual meeting of the North American membrane society and 11th international conference on inorganic membranes 2010, NAMS/ICIM 2010, pp 586–588

  • Park HJ, Kim PJ, Son HS (2009) Oxygen permeation and stability of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ membrane according to trace elements and oxygen partial pressure in synthetic air. Energy Procedia 1:369–374. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin ES, Davison JE, Herzog HJ (2015) The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int J Greenh Gas Control 40:378–400. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebahn S (2014) Optimized CO2 capture in IGCC power plants by water gas shift membrane reactors. (in German) Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Energy Environ 213:203

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebahn S, Zhao I, Grünewald M (2011) Physical absorption materials for CO2 capture. In: Stolten D, Scherer V (eds) Process engineering for CCS power plants: efficient carbon capture for coal power plants. Wiley, New York, pp 175–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber A, Zapp P, Marx J (2012) Meta-analysis of life cycle assessment studies on electricity generation with carbon capture and storage. J Ind Ecol 16:S155–S168. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00435.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber A, Marx J, Zapp P (2013) Environmental assessment of a membrane-based air separation for a coal-fired oxyfuel power plant. J Membr Sci 440:122–133. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Küppers F, Baumann S, Meulenberg WA, Stöver D, Buchkremer HP (2013) Manufacturing and performance of advanced supported Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ (BSCF) oxygen transport membranes. J Membr Sci 433:121–125. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Strømman AH, Hertwich EG (2011) Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:911–921. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler H, Beggel F, Habermehl M, Persigehl B, Kneer R, Modigell M et al (2011) Oxyfuel coal combustion by efficient integration of oxygen transport membranes. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troy S (2012) CO2 free coal enegy by using carbon capture and storage andbiomass co-incineration (in German). Doctor Thesis, Ruhr-University Bochum

  • Vente JF, Haije WG, Ijpelaan R, Rusting FT (2006) On the full-scale module design of an air separation unit using mixed ionic electronic conducting membranes. J Membr Sci 278:66–71. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • VGB PowerTech e.V (2004) Concept study reference power plant North Rhine-Westphalia (RKW NRW) (in German). VGB PowerTech Service GmbH, Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • VGB PowerTech e.V (2010) Pre-engineering study NRW power plant 700 °C’ NRWPP700. VGB PowerTech e.V, Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Viebahn P, Nitsch J, Fischedick M, Esken A, Schüwer D, Supersberger N et al (2007) Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany. Int J Greenh Gas Control 1:121–133. doi:10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00024-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viebahn P, Daniel V, Samuel H (2012) Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies. Appl Energy 97:238–248. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkart K, Bauer C, Boulet C (2013) Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in power generation and industry in Europe. Int J Greenh Gas Control 16:91–106. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.03.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wildbolz C (2007) Life cycle assessment of selected technologies for CO2 transport and sequestration. Diploma-Thesis No. 2077M505, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich, Institute of Environmental Engineering (IfU), ETH Zürich

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Energy and Climate Research - Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany

    Stefanie Troy, Andrea Schreiber & Petra Zapp

Authors
  1. Stefanie Troy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Schreiber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petra Zapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Troy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troy, S., Schreiber, A. & Zapp, P. Life cycle assessment of membrane-based carbon capture and storage. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18, 1641–1654 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1208-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1208-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation