Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hub-and-spoke stroke network in the Veneto region: a retrospective study investigating the effectiveness of the stroke pathway and trends over time

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After recognizing the pivotal role played by stroke unit (SU) admission in reducing mortality and dependency in stroke patients, the need to organize and monitor stroke networks has become an increasingly essential aspect of stroke care. We conducted a retrospective study of stroke patients admitted to hospitals in the Veneto region from 2007 to 2015 in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the stroke pathway and trends over time. Between 2007 and 2015, 61,062 stroke patients were discharged from Veneto hospitals: they were more frequently female, females were older than males, and had higher intrahospital mortality and a lower probability of undergoing systemic thrombolysis. Patients admitted to facilities with a level 2 SU were twice as likely to undergo thrombolytic treatment compared to those admitted to facilities with a level 1 and had a lower intrahospital mortality rate. During the collection period, thrombolytic treatments increased in both level 1 and 2 SUs, as did the number of patients admitted to neurology wards and to facilities with an SU. Our study confirmed that thrombolytic treatment and admission to a facility with an SU are important determinants in improving stroke patient outcome. The increase in the proportion of both SU admissions and thrombolytic treatments demonstrates the effectiveness of the regional hub-and-spoke organization model, suggesting that implementation of highly specialized facilities is an efficient strategy in improving stroke care. The role of the observed sex bias in stroke treatment and outcome needs to be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration (2002) Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000197

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM et al (2013) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 44:870–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paper C (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:457–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. (2016) ISO-SPREAD Ictus cerebrale: linee guida italiane di prevenzione e trattamento. VIII Edizione

  5. Roumie CL, Mitchel E, Gideon PS, Varas-Lorenzo C, Castellsangue J, Griffin MR (2008) Validation of ICD-9 codes with a high positive predictive value for incident strokes resulting in hospitalization using Medicaid health data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17(1):20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein LB (1998) Accuracy of ICD-9-CM coding for the identification of patients with acute ischemic stroke: effect of modifier codes. Stroke 29:1602–1604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iacoviello L, Costanzo S, Perichillo M, Sparano A, Bartolo M, Polizzi BM et al (2016) Hospital-based register of stroke in the Molise region: focus on main subtypes of stroke. Years 2009-2013. Neurol Sci 37:191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bushnell C, McCullough LD, Awad IA, Chireau MV, Fedder WN, Furie KL et al (2014) Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professional from the American Heart association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 45:1545–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paolucci S, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Fusco FR, Morelli D, Venturiero V, Pratesi L (2006) Is sex a prognostic factor in stroke rehabilitation? A matched comparison. Stroke 37:2989–2994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gall SL, Tran PL, Martin K, Blizzard L, Srikanth V (2012) Sex differences in log-term outcomes after stroke. Functional outcomes, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke 43:1982–1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW, Lynch G et al (2008) Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol 7(10):915–926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Toni D, Mangiafico S, Agostoni E, Bergui M, Cerrato P, Ciccone A et al (2015) Intravenous thrombolysis and intra-arterial interventions in acute ischemic stroke: Italian Stroke Organisation (ISO)-SPREAD guidelines. Int J Stroke 10:1119–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Nardetto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nardetto, L., Giometto, B., Moretto, G. et al. Hub-and-spoke stroke network in the Veneto region: a retrospective study investigating the effectiveness of the stroke pathway and trends over time. Neurol Sci 38, 2117–2121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3118-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3118-z

Keywords

Navigation