Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Italian normative data for the Battery for Visuospatial Abilities (TERADIC)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Battery for Visuospatial Abilities (BVA, known in Italy as TeRaDiC) has been developed to analyse putative basic skills involved in drawing and to plan and monitor outcomes after rehabilitation of visuoconstructional disorders. It encompasses eight tasks assessing both simple “perceptual” abilities, such as line length and line orientation judgments and complex “representational” abilities, such as mental rotation. The aim of present study was to provide normative values for BVA collected in a wide sample of healthy Italian subjects. Three hundred seventeen healthy Italian subjects (173 women and 144 men) of different age classes (age range, 40–95 years) and education level (from primary to university), with a normal score on Mini Mental State Examination, completed BVA/TeRaDiC. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age and education significantly influenced performance on most tests of the BVA/TeRaDiC; only line length judgment was not affected by educational level. Gender significantly affected line orientation judgment and mental rotation, with an advantage for males in both tests. From the derived linear equations, a correction grid for adjusting BVA/TeRaDiC raw scores was built. Using a non-parametric technique, inferential cut-off scores were determined and equivalent scores computed. The present study provided Italian normative data for the BVA/TeRaDiC useful for both clinical and research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trojano L, Conson M (2008) Visuospatial and visuoconstructive deficits. Handb Clin Neurol 88:373–391. doi:10.1016/S0072-9752(07)88019-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Renzi E (1982) Disorders of space exploration and cognition. Wiley, Chichster

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benton A, Hannay HJ, Varney NR (1975) Visual perception of line direction in patients with unilateral brain disease. Neurology 25:907–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benton AL, Varney NR, Hamsher KD (1978) Visuospatial judgment. A clinical test. Arch Neurol 35:364–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Treccani B, Torri T, Cubelli R (2005) Is judgement of line orientation selectively impaired in right brain damaged patients? Neuropsychologia 43:598–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Treccani B, Cubelli R (2011) The need for a revised version of the Benton judgment of line orientation test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33:249–256. doi:10.1080/13803395.2010.511150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warrington EK, James M (1991) VOSP, the visual object and space perception battery. Thames Valley Test Company, Suffolk

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW (1993) BORB Birmingham object recognition battery. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kerkhoff G (1998) Rehabilitation of visuospatial cognition and visual exploration in neglect: a Cross-over Study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 12:27–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serino A, Cecere R, Dundon N, Bertini C, Sanchez-Castaneda C, Làdavas E (2014) When apperceptive agnosia is explained by a deficit of primary visual processing. Cortex 52:12–27. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valtonen J, Dilks DD, McCloskey M (2008) Cognitive representation of orientation: a case study. Cortex 44:1171–1187. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossi D, Fragassi NA, Giani E, Trojano L (1998) The selective inability to draw horizontal lines: a peculiar constructional disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:795–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trojano L, Grossi D, Flash T (2009) Cognitive neuroscience of drawing: contributions of neuropsychological, experimental and neurofunctional studies. Cortex 45:269–277. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Angelini R, Grossi D (1993) La terapia razionale dei disordini costruttivi (Te.Ra.Di.C). Clinica S. Lucia, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trojano L, Fragassi NA, Chiacchio L, Izzo O, Izzo G, Di Cesare G, Cristinzio C, Grossi D (2004) Relationships between constructional and visuospatial abilities in normal subjects and in focal brain-damaged patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 26:1103–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Capitani E, Laiacona M (1997) Composite neuropsychological batteries and demographic correction: standardization based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. The Italian Group for the Neuropsychological Study of Ageing. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19:795–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Measso G, Cavarzeran F, Zappala G, Lebowitz BD, Crook TH, Pirozzolo FJ et al (1993) The mini-mental state examination: normative study of an Italian random sample. Developmental Neuropsychology 9:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilks SS (1941) Determination of samples size for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat 12:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cattelani R, Dal Sasso F, Corsini D, Posteraro L (2011) The modified five-point test: normative data for a sample of Italian healthy adults aged 16-60. Neurol Sci 32:595–601. doi:10.1007/s10072-011-0489-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ackermann H (1985) Mehrdimensionale nichtparamatrische Normbereiche. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 6:8–20

    Google Scholar 

  22. Papagno C (2002) Progressive impairment of constructional abilities: visuospatial sketchpad deficit? Neuropsychologia 40:1858–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trojano L, Grossi D (1998) ‘Pure’ constructional apraxia—a cognitive analysis of a single case. Behav Neurol 11:43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grossi D, Fragassi NA, Chiacchio L, Valoroso L, Tuccillo R, Perrotta C, Rapone P, Conchiglia G, Trojano L (2002) Do visuospatial and constructional disturbances differentiate frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease? an experimental study of a clinical belief. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 17:641–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bianchi A, Dai Prà M (2008) Twenty years after Spinnler and Tognoni: new instruments in the Italian neuropsychologist’s toolbox. Neurol Sci 29:209–217. doi:10.1007/s10072-008-0970-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A (2002) Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 22:443–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G (1996) The mental deterioration battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The Group for the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. Eur Neurol 36:378–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mittenberg W, Seidenberg M, O’Leary DS, DiGiulio DV (1989) Changes in cerebral functioning associated with normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 11:918–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoogendam YY, Hofman A, van der Geest JN, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA (2014) Patterns of cognitive function in aging: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol 29:133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Benton AL, Hamsher K, Varney NR et al (1983) Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: a clinical manual. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ardila A, Rosselli M, Rosas P (1989) Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: visuospatial and memory abilities. Brain Cogn 11:147–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ostrosky-Solís F, Ardila A, Rosselli M (1999) NEUROPSI: a brief neuropsychological test battery in Spanish with norms by age and educational level. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 5:413–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosselli M, Ardila A, Rosas P (1990) Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates. II Language and praxic abilities. Brain Cogn 12:281–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosselli M, Ardila A (2003) The impact of culture and education on non verbal neuropsychological measurements: a critical review. Brain Cogn 52:326–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salatino A, Poncini M, George MS, Ricci R (2014) Hunting for right and left parietal hot spots using single-pulse TMS: modulation of visuospatial perception during line bisection judgment in the healthy brain. Front Psychol 5:1238. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01238

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goyette SR, McCoy JG, Kennedy A, Sullivan M (2012) Sex differences on the judgment of line orientation task: a function of landmark presence and hormonal status. Physiol Behav 105:1045–1051. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Burton LA, Henninger D, Hafetz J (2005) Gender differences in relations of mental rotation, verbal fluency, and SAT scores to finger length ratios as hormonal indexes. Dev Neuropsychol 28:493–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ganley CM, Vasilyeva M, Dulaney A (2014) Spatial ability mediates the gender difference in middle school students’ science performance. Child Dev 85:1419–1432. doi:10.1111/cdev.12230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jansen P, Kaltner S (2014) Object-based and egocentric mental rotation performance in older adults: the importance of gender differences and motor ability. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 21:296–316. doi:10.1080/13825585.2013.805725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pellkofer J, Jansen P, Heil M (2014) Sex-specific lateralization of event-related potential effects during mental rotation of polygons. Neuroreport [Epub 6]

  41. Semrud-Clikeman M, Fine JG, Bledsoe J, Zhu DC (2012) Gender differences in brain activation on a mental rotation task. Int J Neurosci 122:590–597. doi:10.3109/00207454.2012.693999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D (2012) Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  43. Grossi D, Calise G, Correra C, Trojano L (1996) Selective drawing disorders after right subcortical stroke: a neuropsychological premorbid and follow-up case study. Ital J Neurol Sci 17:241–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Trojano.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10072_2015_2114_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Figure 1. Examples of the tasks enclosed in the BVA/TeRaDiC. A: Line length judgment. B: Line orientation judgment. C: Angle width judgment. D: Point position identification. E: Mental rotation task. F: Complex figure identification. G: Hidden figure identification. H: Mental construction task (TIFF 235 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trojano, L., Siciliano, M., Pedone, R. et al. Italian normative data for the Battery for Visuospatial Abilities (TERADIC). Neurol Sci 36, 1353–1361 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2114-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2114-4

Keywords

Navigation