Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-Italian version: regression based norms and equivalent scores

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief cognitive screening instrument developed by Nasreddine et al. to detect mild cognitive impairment, a high-risk condition for Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia. In this study we report normative data on the MoCA-Italian version, collected on a sample of 225 Italian healthy subjects ranged in age between 60 and 80 years, and in formal education from 5 to 23 years. The global normal cognition was established in accordance with the Mini–Mental State Examination score and with the Prose Memory Test score (Spinnler and Tognoni, Ital J Neurol Sci 6:25–27, 1987). None of the participants had a history of psychiatric, neurological, cerebrovascular disorders or brain injury or took drugs affecting cognition. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the potential effect of age, education and sex on the MoCA total performance score. We provide correction grids to adjust raw scores and equivalent scores with cut-off value to allow comparison between MoCA performance and others neuropsychological test scores that can be administered on the same subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rabins PV, Ritchie K, Rossor M, Thal L, Winblad B (2001) Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 58:1985–1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Storandt M, Grant EA, Miller JP, Morris JC (2006) Longitudinal course and neuropathologic outcomes in original vs. revised MCI and in pre-MCI. Neurology 67:467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pirani A, Tulipani C, Neri M (2006) italian translation of MoCA test and of its instructions. http://www.mocatest.org

  5. Micieli G, Bottini G, Cerri C et al (2012) Complicanze psicocognitive dell'ictus. In: SPREAD stroke prevention and educational awareness diffusion. Ictus cerebrale: linee guida italiane di prevenzione e trattamento, 7th edn. Pierrel Research Italy Spa, Milano, p 110

  6. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Measso G, Cavarzeran F, Zappalà G, Lebowittz BD, Crook TH, Pirazzolo FJ, Amaducci LA, Massari D, Grigoletto F (1993) The Mini-Mental State Examination: normative study of an Italian random sample. Dev Neuropsychol 9:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e Taratura Italiana di Test Neuropsicolgici. Ital J Neurol Sci 6:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  9. Capitani E (1997) Normative data and neuropsychological assessment. Common problems in clinical practice and research. Neuropsychol Rehabil 7:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salthouse TA (1991) Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, p 438

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lenehan ME, Klekociuk SZ, Summers MJ (2012) Absence of a relationship between subjective memory complaint and objective memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment (MCI): is it time to abandon subjective memory complaint as an MCI diagnostic criterion? Int Psychogeriatr 24:1505–1514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Purser JL, Fillenbaum GG, Wallace RB (2006) Memory complaint is not necessary for diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and does not predict 10-year trajectories of functional disability, word recall, or short portable mental status questionnaire limitations. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:335–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts JL, Clare L, Woods RT (2009) Subjective memory complaints and awareness of memory functioning in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 28:95–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G (1996) The Mental Deterioration Battery: normative data diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The group of the standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. Eur Neurol 36:378–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baek MJ, Kim HJ, Kim S (2012) Comparison between the story recall test and the word-list learning test in Korean patients with mild cognitive impairment and early stage of Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 34:396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabin LA, Paré N, Saykin AJ, Brown MJ, Wishart HA, Flashman LA, Santulli RB (2009) Differential memory test sensitivity for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment and predicting conversion to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 16:357–376

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tremont G, Miele A, Smith MM, Westervelt HJ (2010) Comparison of verbal memory impairment rates in mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 32:630–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Christensen H, Hardzi-Parlovic D, Jacomb P (1997) The psychometric differentiation of dementia from normal aging: a meta-analysis. Psychol Assess 3:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilks KK (1941) Determination of sample size for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat 12:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Capitani E, Laiacona M (2000) Classification and modelling in neuropsychology: from groups to single cases. In: Boller F, Grafman J, Rizzolatti G (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, 2nd edn, vol 1, pp 53–76

  21. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips N, Chertkow H (2012) Comment on: Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Author replay. Neurology 78:765–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Narazaki K, Nofuji Y, Honda T, Matsuo E, Yonemoto K, Kumagai S (2013) Normative data for the Montreal cognitive assessment in a Japanese community-dwelling older population. Neuroepidemiology 40:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Freitas S, Simões MR, Alves L, Santana I (2011) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): normative study for the Portuguese population. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33:989–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frasson P, Ghiretti R, Catricalà E, Pomati S, Marcone A, Parisi L, Rossini PM, Cappa SF, Mariani C, Vanacore N, Clerici F (2011) Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test: an Italian normative study. Neurol Sci 32:1057–1062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Apollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, Piamarta F, Consoli T, Villa ML, Forapani E, Russo A, Nichelli P (2005) The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 26:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Erminio Capitani for his comments on a preliminary draft of this study.

Daniella Mancini revised the English text. Thanks to Maria Leggieri for logistic help.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Conti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conti, S., Bonazzi, S., Laiacona, M. et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-Italian version: regression based norms and equivalent scores. Neurol Sci 36, 209–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1921-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1921-3

Keywords

Navigation