Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in acromegalic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Joint involvement is one of the most frequent clinical complications of acromegaly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the femoral cartilage thicknesses of acromegalic patients using ultrasound (US). Sixty-two patients diagnosed with acromegaly (30 F, 32 M) were included. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. The thickness of the femoral articular cartilage was measured using a 6- to 18-MHz linear probe. Measurements were performed bilaterally from three points (medial condyle, intercondylar area, and lateral condyle). Of the patients, 14 (22.5 %) reported pain in the knee joints. A significantly higher femoral articular cartilage thickness was determined in the patients compared with the controls (all parameters, p < 0.001). US measurements results from all points were consistent, but these values were not correlated with levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Analysis of acromegaly patients as active (n = 37) or inactive (n = 25) revealed no significance with respect to femoral cartilage thickness. Acromegalic patients seem to have thicker femoral articular cartilages irrespective of disease activity state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauman G (2002) Growth hormone and its disorders. In: Becker KL, Kahn RC, Rebar RW (eds) Principles and practices of endocrinology and metabolism. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 129–45

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dons RF, Rosselet P, Pastakia B, Doppman J, Gorden P (1998) Arthropathy in acromegalic patients before and after treatment: a long term follow up study. Clin Endocrinol 28:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Layton MW, Fudman EJ, Barkan A, Braunstein EM, Fox IH (1988) Acromegalic arthropathy: characteristics and response to therapy. Arthritis Rheum 31:1022–1027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Podgorski M, Robinson B, Weissberger A, Steil J, Wang S, Brooks PM (1998) Articular manifestations of acromegaly. Aust NZ J Med 18:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacks S, Jacobs RP (1986) Acromegalic arthropathy: a reversible rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol 13:634–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roelfsema F, van Dulken H, Frolich M (1985) Long-term results of transsphenoidal pituitary microsurgery in 60 acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol 23:555–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eryılmaz OG, Kara M, Tiftik T, Aksakal FN, Uzunlar Ö, Su FA et al (2012) Ultrasonographic measurement of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Sterility J 97(1):235–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kara M, Tiftik T, Öken Ö, Akkaya M, Tunc H, Özcakar L (2013) Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 45(2):145–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaya A, Kara M, Tiftik T, Ozel S, Ersöz M, Göker M et al (2013) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the muscle architecture in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Rheumatol 32(8):1155–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saarakkala S, Waris P, Waris V, Tarkiainen I, Karvanen E, Aarnio J, Koski JM (2012) Diagnostic performance of knee ultrasonography for detecting degenerative changes of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20(5):376–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naredo E, Acebes C, Möller I, Canillas F, de Agustin JJ, de Miguel E et al (2009) Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1322–1327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colao A, Marzullo P, Vallone G, Marino V, Annecchino M, Ferone D et al (1998) Reversibility of joint thickening in acromegalic patients: an ultrasonography study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2121–2125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Colao A, Marzullo P, Vallone G, Giaccio A, Ferone D, Rossi E (1999) Ultrasonographic evidence of joint thickening reversibility in acromegalic patients treated with lanreotide for 12 months. Clin Endocrinol 51:611–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Möller I, Bong D, Naredo E, Filippuci E, Carrasco I, Moragues C (2008) Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Frohman L, Ho K (2000) Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:526–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD, Klibanski A, Lamberts S, Casanueva FF et al (2010) Acromegaly Consensus Group: a consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:3141–3148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elmlinger MW, Kühnel W, Weber MM, Ranke MB (2004) Reference ranges for two automated chemiluminescent assays for serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3). Clin Chem Lab Med J 42(6):654–664

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G (2004) Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev 25:102–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Melmed S, Casanueva F, Cavagnini F, Chanson P, Frohman LA, Gaillard R (2005) Consensus statement: medical management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 153:737–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lieberman SA, Bjorkengren AG, Hoffman AR (1992) Rheumatologic and skeletal changes in acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 21:615–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee CL, Huang MH, Chai CY, Chen CH, Su JY, Tien YC (2008) The validity of in vivo ultrasonographic grading of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage: a comparison with in vitro ultrasonographic and histologic gradings. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:352–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare. None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Karkucak.

Additional information

Karkucak M. and Batmaz I. equally contributed to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karkucak, M., Batmaz, İ., Civan, N. et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in acromegalic patients. Clin Rheumatol 34, 157–161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2543-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2543-0

Keywords

Navigation