Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) vs. titanium tacks: a randomised controlled experimental study in pigs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The main reason for hospital stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is probably pain, which also causes a lengthening of the patient’s time to assume normal daily activities and work. It is likely that titanium tacks may be the main contributing factor to early (and maybe chronic) pain after LVHR. Therefore, non-invasive and patient-friendly mesh fixation methods must be considered. The present study was designed to investigate the technical applicability, safety and effect of Tisseel® for intraperitoneal mesh fixation.

Methods

Nine 40-kg Danish Landrace female pigs had two pieces of MotifMESH® and two pieces of Proceed® mesh fixed in the intraperitoneal position by a laparoscopic technique. The two pieces of the same mesh were fixed with fibrin glue (Tisseel) and titanium tacks, respectively. All pigs were euthanised on the 30th postoperative day and the mesh–tissue samples were tested for strength of ingrowth (peel test), adhesion formation, mesh shrinkage and examined for histological alterations.

Results

No meshes were displaced from their initial position at autopsy, but we observed two cases of mesh folding that could have resulted in hernia recurrence in real patients. There were no significant differences in the strength of ingrowth between different mesh types or fixation methods, measured as peel work per area of mesh (J/m2) and peak force per width of mesh (Nmax/cm). The Proceed mesh shrank by 11% compared to 4% for the MotifMESH mesh (p =  0.002). There was no difference in the grade of adhesions (%) between fixation methods (p = 0.794) or different mesh types (p = 0.296). In the same fashion, there was no difference in the strength of adhesions (grades 0–4) between the two fixation methods or different mesh types (p>0.5, χ2 test). There was no significant difference in the formation of fibrosis or inflammation between the different meshes or fixation methods. All samples showed significant foreign-body reaction with giant cells.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the laparoscopic fixation of an intraperitoneal mesh with Tisseel is safe and technically feasible in a pig model. There is still no evidence that fibrin-sealing alone is appropriate for intraperitoneal mesh fixation in hernia repair, but the technique might become an alternative or supplement to mechanical mesh fixation. Until then, further experimental research in animal hernia models with larger meshes is needed, especially with a focus on mesh folding and displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6a, b
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canonico S, Santoriello A, Campitiello F, Fattopace A, Corte AD, Sordelli I, Benevento R (2005) Mesh fixation with human fibrin glue (Tissucol) in open tension-free inguinal hernia repair: a preliminary report. Hernia 9:330–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, Faillace G, Longoni M (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245:222–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olmi S, Erba L, Bertolini A, Scaini A, Croce E (2006) Fibrin glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: indications, technique, and outcomes. Surg Endosc 20:1846–1850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Bertolini A, Croce E (2007) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using an intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique and a Parietex composite mesh fixed with fibrin glue (Tissucol). Personal technique and preliminary results. Surg Endosc 21:1961–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 21:409–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carbajo MA, Martín del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, de la Cuesta C, Toledano M, Martin F, Vaguero C, Inglada L (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13:250–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kulkarni MP, Pawar DK (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 20:1839–1845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R, Erbil Y, Dinccag A, Deveci U, Ozarmagan S, Mercan S (2007) The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Olmi S, Scaini A, Cesana GC, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 21:555–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Voskerician G, Gingras PH, Anderson JM (2006) Macroporous condensed poly(tetrafluoroethylene). I. In vivo inflammatory response and healing characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res A 76:234–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Voskerician G, Rodriguez A, Gingras PH (2007) Macroporous condensed poly(tetra fluoro-ethylene). II. In vivo effect on adhesion formation and tissue integration. J Biomed Mater Res A 82:426–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanzafame RJ, Stadler I, Brondon P, Soltz BA, Devore DP (2005) Preliminary assessment of postoperative adhesion formation after laser-assisted mesh fixation to the peritoneal surface. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, Mason RJ, Kiyabu M, Grant SW, Achanta K, Kirkman EL, Narayanan K, Essani R (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulze S, Kristiansen VB, Hansen BF, Rosenberg J (2005) Biological tissue adhesive for mesh-application in pigs: an experimental study. Surg Endosc 19:342–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Walder N, Mittermayr R, Ohlinger W, Heinze A, Redl H (2007) Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair. Surg Endosc 21:1781–1785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny R, Mittermayr R, Ohlinger W, Redl H (2005) Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat. Hernia 9:322–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McGinty JJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Fowler DL (2005) A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 19:786–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Majercik S, Tsikitis V, Iannitti DA (2006) Strength of tissue attachment to mesh after ventral hernia repair with synthetic composite mesh in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 20:1671–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksen JR, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2007) Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 11:481–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Toosie K, Gallego K, Stabile BE, Schaber B, French S, de Virgilio C (2000) Fibrin glue reduces intra-abdominal adhesions to synthetic mesh in a rat ventral hernia model. Am Surg 66:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. de Virgilio C, Elbassir M, Hidalgo A, Schaber B, French S, Amin S, Stabile BE (1999) Fibrin glue reduces the severity of intra-abdominal adhesions in a rat model. Am J Surg 178:577–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by grants from the A.P. Moeller Foundation, Denmark. Surgical products were sponsored by Baxter A/S, Denmark (Tisseel®) and Proxy Biomedical Ltd., Ireland (MotifMESH). We thank Karl Storz, Denmark, the veterinary workers at the Royal Veterinarian University, Copenhagen, Denmark, and the technicians at the Materials Research Department, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark for their help during the study.

Conflicts of interest

J. Rosenberg has, for other studies, received research grants from Ethicon Endosurgery and Karl Storz.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Eriksen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eriksen, J.R., Bech, J.I., Linnemann, D. et al. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (Tisseel®) vs. titanium tacks: a randomised controlled experimental study in pigs. Hernia 12, 483–491 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0375-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0375-z

Keywords

Navigation